<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Antiplanner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ti.org/antiplanner/?feed=rss2&#038;p=7063" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner</link>
	<description>Dedicated to the sunset of government planning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:00:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>More Support for Abolishing New Starts</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=8012</link>
		<comments>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=8012#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Antiplanner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rail transit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=8012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today, the Cato Institute releases my policy paper on the Federal Transit Administration&#8217;s &#8220;New Starts&#8221; program that gives about $2 billion a year in grants to cities to build new streetcar, low-capacity rail, and other rail transit lines. My basic argument is that nearly all of the billions spent on this program since 1992 have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?feed=rss2&#038;p=8012</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recreation Fee Testimony</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=8008</link>
		<comments>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=8008#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 07:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Antiplanner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Public lands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=8008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Antiplanner is testifying this morning before the House Public Lands Subcommittee in favor of allowing federal land agencies to charge dispersed recreation fees (agencies today can charge for developed recreation, but not dispersed). My testimony is only two pages long, as it is supplemented by a just-released Cato Institute report on the same subject. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?feed=rss2&#038;p=8008</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Back in the Air Again</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=8002</link>
		<comments>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=8002#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 07:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Antiplanner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Housekeeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public lands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=8002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Antiplanner is traveling to Washington DC today where I&#8217;ll testify tomorrow before the House Public Lands Subcommittee on federal land recreation fees. By an extraordinary coincidence, tomorrow the Cato Institute will release my policy paper recommending that Congress allow the Forest Service, Park Service, and other public land agencies to charge recreationists fair market [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?feed=rss2&#038;p=8002</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>They&#8217;ll Do It Every Time</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=7998</link>
		<comments>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=7998#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 07:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Antiplanner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[City planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=7998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A middle-class urban planner sees a working-class neighborhood and says, &#8220;I wouldn&#8217;t want to live there. That neighborhood must be blighted.&#8221; So the planner convinces the city to spend hundreds of millions of dollars revitalizing the neighborhood: clearing older buildings and replacing them with new high-density, mixed-use developments that the middle-class urban planner wouldn&#8217;t want [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?feed=rss2&#038;p=7998</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Great Society Subway Slowly Grinds to a Halt</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=7992</link>
		<comments>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=7992#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 07:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Antiplanner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rail transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington DC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=7992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some called it the Great Society Subway, and like a metaphor for the failure of Lyndon Johnson&#8217;s grandiose plans, the Washington Metro Rail system is slowly breaking down. No less than the Washington Post calls it &#8220;a slow-rolling embarrassment whose creeping obsolescence is so pervasive, and so corrosive, that Washingtonians are increasingly abandoning it.&#8221; System [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?feed=rss2&#038;p=7992</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Killing Our Economy</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=7986</link>
		<comments>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=7986#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 04:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Antiplanner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News commentary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=7986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those who believe in human-caused climate change often point out that skeptics are most likely to be economic conservatives who don&#8217;t like the idea of problems that can&#8217;t be solved by the free market. But the accusation goes the other way as well: believers are most likely to be self-described progressives who love big government [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?feed=rss2&#038;p=7986</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trend or Coercion?</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=7982</link>
		<comments>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=7982#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 07:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Antiplanner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=7982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal reports that the &#8220;latest urban trend&#8221; is &#8220;less elbow room&#8221; as measured by an increase in accessory units and additional homes built on the lots once occupied by only one home. To illustrate this &#8220;trend,&#8221; the Journal had to travel to Vancouver, BC, which Wendell Cox ranks as second only to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?feed=rss2&#038;p=7982</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the Feds Sideline Driverless Cars?</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=7978</link>
		<comments>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=7978#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 07:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Antiplanner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driverless cars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=7978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Feds ask states to sideline driverless cars,&#8221; warns Forbes magazine. That&#8217;s actually a bit of a stretch. What the 14-page report from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) &#8220;recommends&#8221; is that states authorize self-driving cars for testing only, and that states that want to permit &#8220;non-testing operation of self-driving vehicles&#8221; should at least require [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?feed=rss2&#038;p=7978</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smugness Alert</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=7971</link>
		<comments>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=7971#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 07:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Antiplanner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News commentary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=7971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Young people have been told so often that they are especially virtuous for living in inner cities and riding transit instead of driving that they have developed a serious epidemic of smugness. For example, one writes that &#8220;my generation is car-sharing, using transit, walking, biking and generally using any number of forms of transportation that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?feed=rss2&#038;p=7971</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High-Speed Rail in Court</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=7965</link>
		<comments>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=7965#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 07:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Antiplanner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-speed rail]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=7965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Friday, opponents of California&#8217;s high-speed rail line told a California state judge that the California High-Speed Rail Authority has not met all the requirements to start building the first stage of the state&#8217;s high-speed rail line. As approved by voters in 2008, the law requires, among other things, that the authority identify the &#8220;sources [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?feed=rss2&#038;p=7965</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
