<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brookings Discovers Driverless Cars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ti.org/antiplanner/?feed=rss2&#038;p=6761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6761</link>
	<description>Dedicated to the sunset of government planning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 23:52:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6761&#038;cpage=1#comment-302591</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6761#comment-302591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me break this one down for you as I know it requires higher-level thinking skills you don&#039;t have.

Saying that autonomous cars cannot co-exist with conventional cars is like saying that horses and cars could not co-exist on the road just after the invention of cars. 

Within a few years, there were no more horses on the road. 

This is &quot;dinosaur thinking&quot; (or an outmoded way of thinking) that doesn&#039;t consider that transition periods  between differing technologies are fast and generally not the slippery slope into chaos that some commenters here would like you to believe.

Get it now?

And it&#039;s &lt;i&gt;too&lt;/i&gt; not &lt;i&gt;to&lt;/i&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me break this one down for you as I know it requires higher-level thinking skills you don&#8217;t have.</p>
<p>Saying that autonomous cars cannot co-exist with conventional cars is like saying that horses and cars could not co-exist on the road just after the invention of cars. </p>
<p>Within a few years, there were no more horses on the road. </p>
<p>This is &#8220;dinosaur thinking&#8221; (or an outmoded way of thinking) that doesn&#8217;t consider that transition periods  between differing technologies are fast and generally not the slippery slope into chaos that some commenters here would like you to believe.</p>
<p>Get it now?</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s <i>too</i> not <i>to</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the highwayman</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6761&#038;cpage=1#comment-302456</link>
		<dc:creator>the highwayman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6761#comment-302456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see horses on streets to often, though they can co-exist with other street users.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see horses on streets to often, though they can co-exist with other street users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6761&#038;cpage=1#comment-301227</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 00:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6761#comment-301227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes. &lt;a href=&quot;http://i1191.photobucket.com/albums/z479/sequoiatreehugger/philosoraptor-dinosaur-thinking.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dinosaur thinking&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. <a href="http://i1191.photobucket.com/albums/z479/sequoiatreehugger/philosoraptor-dinosaur-thinking.jpg" rel="nofollow">Dinosaur thinking</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6761&#038;cpage=1#comment-301214</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6761#comment-301214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And I&#039;ll reply to my own posts without qualms.

Speaking of subsides to energy: &lt;a href=&quot;http://washingtonexaminer.com/report-energy-department-scrambled-to-justify-letting-solyndras-private-backers-recoup-losses-before-taxpayers/article/2503153&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Report: Energy Department scrambled to justify letting Solyndraâ€™s private backers recoup losses before taxpayers&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I&#8217;ll reply to my own posts without qualms.</p>
<p>Speaking of subsides to energy: <a href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/report-energy-department-scrambled-to-justify-letting-solyndras-private-backers-recoup-losses-before-taxpayers/article/2503153" rel="nofollow">Report: Energy Department scrambled to justify letting Solyndraâ€™s private backers recoup losses before taxpayers</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6761&#038;cpage=1#comment-301212</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6761#comment-301212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;If you need to feel better pretending that oil companies donâ€™t get subsidies, well hey whatever floats your boat!!!1one!&quot;

They get subsidies, as I discussed above. I have no affinity for oil companies, but let&#039;s be accurate and stop spreading the misinformation that they get direct payments from the government as you asserted. That&#039;s a blatant falsehood. Unless you can show that they get direct payments (other than for goods/services rendered) from government, which you so far have been unable to do.

And what floats my boat is walkable neighborhoods. I &lt;3 walking to restaurants and breweries (that aren&#039;t chains) and to parks, and I&#039;ve been living in high density neighborhoods for 11 years (before that rural or national park land). What floats your boat, Dan? Living in a suburb where you have to drive a mile to Wendy&#039;s?

I could work the number myself, but I don&#039;t really care as I have a strong feeling it&#039;s far less than subsides for other modes except for maybe aircraft. I&#039;m pretty sure the Antiplanner showed subsides to automobiles to be about 1 cent ppm. Maybe he can comment on the parking and other stuff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you need to feel better pretending that oil companies donâ€™t get subsidies, well hey whatever floats your boat!!!1one!&#8221;</p>
<p>They get subsidies, as I discussed above. I have no affinity for oil companies, but let&#8217;s be accurate and stop spreading the misinformation that they get direct payments from the government as you asserted. That&#8217;s a blatant falsehood. Unless you can show that they get direct payments (other than for goods/services rendered) from government, which you so far have been unable to do.</p>
<p>And what floats my boat is walkable neighborhoods. I &lt;3 walking to restaurants and breweries (that aren&#039;t chains) and to parks, and I&#039;ve been living in high density neighborhoods for 11 years (before that rural or national park land). What floats your boat, Dan? Living in a suburb where you have to drive a mile to Wendy&#039;s?</p>
<p>I could work the number myself, but I don&#039;t really care as I have a strong feeling it&#039;s far less than subsides for other modes except for maybe aircraft. I&#039;m pretty sure the Antiplanner showed subsides to automobiles to be about 1 cent ppm. Maybe he can comment on the parking and other stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6761&#038;cpage=1#comment-301184</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 21:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6761#comment-301184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Minor problems that will be overcome with time and technology, as were previous problems with automobiles, such as tires that easily got flats, radiators that would freeze in the winter, traffic signals and rules, and so on.

As far as jaywalkers, just try that maneuver in NYC and see what happens; in Portland, I&#039;m sure everyone would be &lt;a href=&quot;http://youtu.be/W-baV-xULLk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;uber accommodating&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minor problems that will be overcome with time and technology, as were previous problems with automobiles, such as tires that easily got flats, radiators that would freeze in the winter, traffic signals and rules, and so on.</p>
<p>As far as jaywalkers, just try that maneuver in NYC and see what happens; in Portland, I&#8217;m sure everyone would be <a href="http://youtu.be/W-baV-xULLk" rel="nofollow">uber accommodating</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6761&#038;cpage=1#comment-301179</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 21:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6761#comment-301179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you need to feel better pretending that oil companies don&#039;t get subsidies, well hey whatever floats your boat!!!1one!

Nevertheless,

&lt;i&gt;But it makes it difficult/impossible to compare the degree of subsidy between different modes of transportation.&lt;/i&gt;

You could learn the number yourself - since you are curious - if you have the time and report back to us. Surely someone has done this work. Maybe Setty knows. Let us know what the answer to your question reveals. 

DS]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you need to feel better pretending that oil companies don&#8217;t get subsidies, well hey whatever floats your boat!!!1one!</p>
<p>Nevertheless,</p>
<p><i>But it makes it difficult/impossible to compare the degree of subsidy between different modes of transportation.</i></p>
<p>You could learn the number yourself &#8211; since you are curious &#8211; if you have the time and report back to us. Surely someone has done this work. Maybe Setty knows. Let us know what the answer to your question reveals. </p>
<p>DS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6761&#038;cpage=1#comment-301177</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 21:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6761#comment-301177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;US$Bns/year subsidies paid to the fossil fuel corporations&quot;

So government doesn&#039;t really pay subsidies to oil companies. No direct payments. I can see how it is easy to go with that rhetoric, though.

&quot;How much does this add up to per passenger mile?
I donâ€™t know. My not knowing the number off the top of my head does not invalidate the assertion of these types of subsidy.&quot;

But it makes it difficult/impossible to compare the degree of subsidy between different modes of transportation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;US$Bns/year subsidies paid to the fossil fuel corporations&#8221;</p>
<p>So government doesn&#8217;t really pay subsidies to oil companies. No direct payments. I can see how it is easy to go with that rhetoric, though.</p>
<p>&#8220;How much does this add up to per passenger mile?<br />
I donâ€™t know. My not knowing the number off the top of my head does not invalidate the assertion of these types of subsidy.&#8221;</p>
<p>But it makes it difficult/impossible to compare the degree of subsidy between different modes of transportation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6761&#038;cpage=1#comment-301167</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 20:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6761#comment-301167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;can you please provide me with evidence that the government directly pays oil companies&lt;/i&gt;

A subsidy need not be so narrowly defined. A direct payment, a tax break, a purposeful allowing to not pay for externalities, other support. Nevertheless, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/55/22/48786795.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; is the latest OECD report.

&lt;i&gt;How much does this add up to per passenger mile?&lt;/i&gt;

I don&#039;t know. My not knowing the number off the top of my head does not invalidate the assertion of these types of subsidy.

DS]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>can you please provide me with evidence that the government directly pays oil companies</i></p>
<p>A subsidy need not be so narrowly defined. A direct payment, a tax break, a purposeful allowing to not pay for externalities, other support. Nevertheless, <a href="http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/55/22/48786795.pdf" rel="nofollow">here</a> is the latest OECD report.</p>
<p><i>How much does this add up to per passenger mile?</i></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know. My not knowing the number off the top of my head does not invalidate the assertion of these types of subsidy.</p>
<p>DS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msetty</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6761&#038;cpage=1#comment-301158</link>
		<dc:creator>msetty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 19:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6761#comment-301158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t regularly reply to myself, but I now know THE strategy for monkey-wrenching to prevent a robocar revolution. &quot;Occupiers&quot; of the urban street world unite!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t regularly reply to myself, but I now know THE strategy for monkey-wrenching to prevent a robocar revolution. &#8220;Occupiers&#8221; of the urban street world unite!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
