<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flash! Amtrak Food Services Loses Money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ti.org/antiplanner/?feed=rss2&#038;p=6822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6822</link>
	<description>Dedicated to the sunset of government planning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 03:13:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: the highwayman</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6822&#038;cpage=1#comment-336694</link>
		<dc:creator>the highwayman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 06:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6822#comment-336694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frank if you drove or took the bus to Missoula would that have been  nostalgic too?

If Amtrak doesn&#039;t serve Missoula, then it doesn&#039;t serve Missoula.

Hey I don&#039;t expect you to drive or go by bus from Seattle to Honolulu either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank if you drove or took the bus to Missoula would that have been  nostalgic too?</p>
<p>If Amtrak doesn&#8217;t serve Missoula, then it doesn&#8217;t serve Missoula.</p>
<p>Hey I don&#8217;t expect you to drive or go by bus from Seattle to Honolulu either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the highwayman</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6822&#038;cpage=1#comment-336692</link>
		<dc:creator>the highwayman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 05:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6822#comment-336692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Toilet paper costs money.

So would you testify against toilet paper too?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toilet paper costs money.</p>
<p>So would you testify against toilet paper too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6822&#038;cpage=1#comment-307619</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6822#comment-307619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re new here, and to see what the problem is with HSR, try reading &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.google.com/search?q=high-speed+rail+site%3A%2F%2Fti.org%2Fantiplanner&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;some previous posts&lt;/a&gt;. 

I take an airplane any day compared to Amtrak. In a recent comment, I mentioned how I had to get to Montana yesterday. My choices were the Greyhound (sketch central with a late-night layover in Spokane--no thanks; too bad Bolt Bus only goes from Portland/Seattle/Vancouver) or flying. I could have taken the train to Whitefish and tried to get a ride, if I wanted to spend nearly 21 hours getting to my destination instead of the hour and 15 minutes it took on the plane. 

The flight was full and the model of aircraft has lower GHG emissions per passenger than driving. And it doesn&#039;t have to slow down when the rails get hot. And it goes more places.

Why anyone would choose Amtrak instead makes no sense, unless it&#039;s for nostalgic purposes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re new here, and to see what the problem is with HSR, try reading <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=high-speed+rail+site%3A%2F%2Fti.org%2Fantiplanner" rel="nofollow">some previous posts</a>. </p>
<p>I take an airplane any day compared to Amtrak. In a recent comment, I mentioned how I had to get to Montana yesterday. My choices were the Greyhound (sketch central with a late-night layover in Spokane&#8211;no thanks; too bad Bolt Bus only goes from Portland/Seattle/Vancouver) or flying. I could have taken the train to Whitefish and tried to get a ride, if I wanted to spend nearly 21 hours getting to my destination instead of the hour and 15 minutes it took on the plane. </p>
<p>The flight was full and the model of aircraft has lower GHG emissions per passenger than driving. And it doesn&#8217;t have to slow down when the rails get hot. And it goes more places.</p>
<p>Why anyone would choose Amtrak instead makes no sense, unless it&#8217;s for nostalgic purposes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buckner</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6822&#038;cpage=1#comment-307567</link>
		<dc:creator>Buckner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6822#comment-307567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really don&#039;t know what the problem is as I love to ride Amtrak and love the food service. I really don&#039;t understand why they say they lose money but then again anything the government seems to try and run never works out. I know it certainly cost a lot of money to go from DC to LA with a sleeper but it sure is stress free and I love it. Maybe some daily auditing may work but then again price things so that money will be made. What I don&#039;t understand if the freight trains can run tons of freight for pennies on the mile, why can&#039;t Amtrak. I think somebody is feeding the public a load of bull crap. Every Amtrak I have ever ridden have always been full, the dinning cars have always been full and I am also willing to bet that they could add more sleeper cars and make money but it seems as if there are only a certain amount of sleeper cars to go around and there are no spares, so that is a problem. I like Amtrak and if need be, let the tax payer pay for the high speed lines and let&#039;s get it done. Every country in the world has high speed rail except for the USA, what is the problem. It seems back in the day the RR Barons certainly got rich running railroads and buying land. I think something is terribly wrong with the system in the United States. I will take the train any day compared to the airlines]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t know what the problem is as I love to ride Amtrak and love the food service. I really don&#8217;t understand why they say they lose money but then again anything the government seems to try and run never works out. I know it certainly cost a lot of money to go from DC to LA with a sleeper but it sure is stress free and I love it. Maybe some daily auditing may work but then again price things so that money will be made. What I don&#8217;t understand if the freight trains can run tons of freight for pennies on the mile, why can&#8217;t Amtrak. I think somebody is feeding the public a load of bull crap. Every Amtrak I have ever ridden have always been full, the dinning cars have always been full and I am also willing to bet that they could add more sleeper cars and make money but it seems as if there are only a certain amount of sleeper cars to go around and there are no spares, so that is a problem. I like Amtrak and if need be, let the tax payer pay for the high speed lines and let&#8217;s get it done. Every country in the world has high speed rail except for the USA, what is the problem. It seems back in the day the RR Barons certainly got rich running railroads and buying land. I think something is terribly wrong with the system in the United States. I will take the train any day compared to the airlines</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6822&#038;cpage=1#comment-306790</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 14:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6822#comment-306790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to get to Missoula, MT in the next week. I &lt;i&gt;could&lt;/i&gt; ride Amtrak to Whitefish and try to get a ride to Missoula. But even if I did that, in addition to the 14-hour, overnight trip, the Amtrak site warns me to expect five-hour delays because of the heat. So it&#039;s at least 19 hours plus a drive.

Or...if I fly, it&#039;s 90 minutes, and it gets me two blocks from my destination. 

Guess which one I&#039;m taking.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to get to Missoula, MT in the next week. I <i>could</i> ride Amtrak to Whitefish and try to get a ride to Missoula. But even if I did that, in addition to the 14-hour, overnight trip, the Amtrak site warns me to expect five-hour delays because of the heat. So it&#8217;s at least 19 hours plus a drive.</p>
<p>Or&#8230;if I fly, it&#8217;s 90 minutes, and it gets me two blocks from my destination. </p>
<p>Guess which one I&#8217;m taking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard B</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6822&#038;cpage=1#comment-306690</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 05:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6822#comment-306690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The got to be kidding. Perhaps  the reason for the revenue lost is  we the customers are starting  to bring our own food instead of paying  the astronomical prices for vending machine food. on Amtrak trains. I have to take the Amtrak Cascades trim from Portland to Tacoma.  My truck will not even make half way. the train looks will worn  and badly in need of updating. I wounder it with just pay extra and flying to Seatac then taking the bus back to  Lakewood WA.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The got to be kidding. Perhaps  the reason for the revenue lost is  we the customers are starting  to bring our own food instead of paying  the astronomical prices for vending machine food. on Amtrak trains. I have to take the Amtrak Cascades trim from Portland to Tacoma.  My truck will not even make half way. the train looks will worn  and badly in need of updating. I wounder it with just pay extra and flying to Seatac then taking the bus back to  Lakewood WA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the highwayman</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6822&#038;cpage=1#comment-305623</link>
		<dc:creator>the highwayman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 03:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6822#comment-305623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mica is a jack ass, roads don&#039;t make money though he isn&#039;t trying to get rid of them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mica is a jack ass, roads don&#8217;t make money though he isn&#8217;t trying to get rid of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andarm16</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6822&#038;cpage=1#comment-305550</link>
		<dc:creator>andarm16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2012 20:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6822#comment-305550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The underlying and most important issue here is that Amtrak has no idea what it wants to be when it grows up, despite being over fourty. The core of this identity crisis is based off of Amtrak&#039;s need to sell itself based on the changes in the political winds. This means that Amtrak has to be everything to everyone. 

The problem with this is that when you try to be everything, you fall short and end up being good at nothing. IE Amtrak is running slower trains with much poorer quality food service, all while losing more money every year. Focusing on the food service losses is just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The underlying and most important issue here is that Amtrak has no idea what it wants to be when it grows up, despite being over fourty. The core of this identity crisis is based off of Amtrak&#8217;s need to sell itself based on the changes in the political winds. This means that Amtrak has to be everything to everyone. </p>
<p>The problem with this is that when you try to be everything, you fall short and end up being good at nothing. IE Amtrak is running slower trains with much poorer quality food service, all while losing more money every year. Focusing on the food service losses is just rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6822&#038;cpage=1#comment-305093</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2012 02:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6822#comment-305093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CPZ:

Airlines don&#039;t make any money either.  They&#039;ve lost tens of billions since deregulation.  Why not get rid of flight attendants and bring in minimum wage contractors?

Maybe Amtrak on board staff should stay Amtrak for the same reason flight attendants need to be airline employees.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CPZ:</p>
<p>Airlines don&#8217;t make any money either.  They&#8217;ve lost tens of billions since deregulation.  Why not get rid of flight attendants and bring in minimum wage contractors?</p>
<p>Maybe Amtrak on board staff should stay Amtrak for the same reason flight attendants need to be airline employees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the highwayman</title>
		<link>http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6822&#038;cpage=1#comment-305066</link>
		<dc:creator>the highwayman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 23:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ti.org/antiplanner/?p=6822#comment-305066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps Mica should only be paid $7.25 an hour with no benefits?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Mica should only be paid $7.25 an hour with no benefits?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
