You lost me at “everyone is” a clear generalization and not a factual statement or a valid argument.

If you had read the article I mentioned, The Externalities of Nuclear Power: First, Assume
We Have a Can Opener . . . , you would have noticed the author’s thesis stated so formulaically and predictably in the intro:

Although even industry proponents
acknowledge that the problem of disposing of spent nuclear fuel remains
unsolved, the industry routinely assumes this problem will be solved in
the future. Unfortunately, this is the same assumption made by nuclear
energy proponents at the beginning of the nuclear industry fifty years
ago. We haven’t solved the nuclear waste problem in the past half
century, and there is no reason to think we will be more likely to do so in
the next one. Like the shipwrecked economist in the old joke, the
nuclear industry continues to postulate that we should “assume we have a
can opener” for the nuclear waste problem.

There is already a far cheaper and safer source of energy. It’s called natural gas and North America has enough to last for centuries.

RIP Neil Armstrong….

NASA packed my bags last night, pre flight, zero hour, 9 am. And I’m gonna be high as Saturn V will take me then. And I think it’s gonna be a long, long time, till splashdown brings me back again to find, I’m not the man they think I am at home, oh no my bones. I’m a lunar man………………………………Lunar Man, burning hydrazine out there.