Back in the Air Again

The Antiplanner is spending this week in Washington, DC. I’ll be giving a presentation on high-speed rail at the Heritage Foundation on Wednesday (I’ll post the presentation tomorrow). If you really wish levitra 20 mg to have the best erections when you are sexually aroused and make love for longer duration. These folks believe that if they are feeling incapability for gaining or holding enough erection, they can get longer cialis tadalafil 20mg lasting erection as well. It improves testosterone and strengthens the online viagra pills reproductive organs. Usually the impotency in men is of many kinds, but in the passage, viagra side effects natural treatment is the theme we offer to interstitial cystitis patient. Unfortunately, seating is limited and it is booked up. But if you are in the DC area, contact me and maybe we can get together some other time.

NY Times on High-Speed Rail

The New York Times Sunday Magazine focused on infrastructure this week and included an article on California high-speed rail. The article included a chart comparing the fares or costs for driving, flying, or taking the high-speed train from Los Angeles to Sacramento.

According to the chart, the airfare is $100, driving is $50, and the train will be $55. That is exceedingly optimistic: the current Amtrak fare is $55, and most other high-speed rail lines cost more than the conventional trains.

But the chart leaves out a big cost: the subsidies. Subsidies to driving and flying are about a penny a mile, or about $4 for the trip from L.A. to Sacramento. But when the construction cost of the California high-speed rail system is amortized over 30 years and then divided by the projected annual passenger miles, you get a construction subsidy of 32 cents per passenger mile, or more than $120.

Continue reading