Last week, the Antiplanner engaged in a cordial debate with Chuck Kooshian of the Center for Clean Air Policy about whether smart growth — compact development combined with transit improvements — is a cost-effective way of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. You can watch the video below and download the slideshows used by Mr. Kooshian and the Antiplanner.
Mr. Kooshian made a good point in his rebuttal. The Antiplanner critiqued a study called Growing Cooler, which assumed that new cars built after 2020 would always average just 35 mpg, when much higher averages were possible and even likely. Mr. Kooshian pointed out that his own study assumed that new cars in 2030 would get 55 mph.
There http://pharma-bi.com/2009/02/another-work-weekend/ sildenafil from canada was no solution to tackle this problem in men, the popular therapy followed is a massage. Buy kamagra online has become convenient, thus, most of cheap viagra tablets the ED patients avail this mode of purchasing. It often points to generic cialis professional a serious issue with trusts, respect and other aspects of relationship. Poor erections are caused by an improper flow of blood to their penis were more http://pharma-bi.com/2011/03/dual-axis-graphs-are-they-useful/ cialis 5 mg likely to face this issue in their life.
Still, the Antiplanner pointed out, Mr. Kooshian’s study did not compare the cost-effectiveness of smart growth vs. even more fuel-efficient cars, and one MIT study estimated that building new cars average 69 would be cost-effective by 2030. Beyond this, I’ll let the video and presentations speak for themselves.
