Brown’s Folly

Jerry Brown didn’t think up the idea of a California high-speed rail line, but he endorsed it last week despite the estimated doubling of its price tag. Brown has recommended that the legislature release funds so construction can begin in 2012.

“Lincoln built the transcontinental railroad during the Civil War, and we built the Golden Gate Bridge during the Great Depression,” Brown said, trying to deflect attention from the state’s financial straits. Bad examples. The Golden Gate Bridge was built with bonds that would eventually be repaid by tolls; the bonds required to build high-speed rail will have to be repaid out of general taxes.

Meanwhile, the transcontinental railroad (which was neither built by Lincoln nor finished during the Civil War) was one of the most corrupt projects of nineteenth-century America, as historian Richard White pointed out in an LA Times op ed piece that Brown should have read a little more closely.

Continue reading

Everybody Wants a Streetcar

The streetcar craze is just insane. Los Angeles wants one; so does San Antonio. It was bad enough when cities all over the country were building light rail, an expensive, obsolete form of transportation that at least has the virtue of providing slightly better service than the local buses it usually replaced. But streetcars have no redeeming transportation value at all; they are hardly faster than walking, they are far more expensive than buses; and (because, for safety reasons, they cannot operate as close together) their capacity is much lower than a bus line.

Yet at the rate things are going, in a few years more cities will have streetcars than light rail. Cincinnati is further along than most other cities; Sacramento is talking about one; Tucson is building one; and Atlanta apparently hasn’t wasted enough money on its flop of a heavy-rail line, so it is talking about streetcars. Even normally sensible Kansas City is talking about streetcars.

Continue reading

Meeting with a Regional Planner

An Aussie who calls himself the Unconventional Economist, also known as Leith van Onselen, created and posted this little cartoon about dealing with regional planners. He based much of it on a script by another blogger named Ross Elliot.

It has been alleged as a splendid quality of anti-impotence pills, which aids ease down unica-web.com levitra on line sale the issue of male impotence. Most of these entities have made email marketing viagra online in india work for them in a truly unique way. Benign Prostate Hyperplasia: What is it? Benign Prostate Hyperplasia, complications of prostate cancer therapy, Pediatric urologic conditions like disorders of the genitalia, neurogenic bladder, enuresis, genitourinary tumors and Male fertility and sexual health conditions such as erectile dysfunction, Peyronie’s disease, retrograde ejaculation, varicocele, hormone imbalance. ordering levitra online The known ranges have historically read as: Normal: Less than 120 over 80 Prehypertension: 120 to 139 over 80 to 89 Stage 1 levitra for sale online high BP: 140 to 159 over 90 to 99 Stage 2 high BP: 160 and above over 100 and above High blood pressure in people who are suffering from high blood pressure. Admittedly, some of the statements made by the planner in the animation are a bit far fetched–real planners would never admit to such things. But it brings home a fundamental question: why should government agencies have the power to make some people rich and impoverish others?

The Unconventional Economist, by the way, has written an impressive series of articles on housing bubbles and policies in various countries, including Canada, China, Germany (one country that didn’t have a bubble), the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. He has also written about U.S. housing markets, including California, Phoenix, and Texas, and of course plenty of posts about Australia. The Antiplanner agrees with almost everything he says, which means many readers of this blog will not.

Max Crashes

Vancouver voters apparently bought claims that C-Tran needed a tax increase to maintain bus service. Meanwhile, TriMet is so eager to reach Vancouver that it crashed a light-rail train into the buffers at the end of the line that could eventually cross the Columbia.

Few knew about the accident until someone sent the security camera video to a bus driver who posted it on his blog. When the Oregonian asked TriMet about it, “the agency said the video didn’t exist and denied knowing about the incident,” then suspended the driver for “invading privacy laws.” Isn’t security camera footage taken by a public agency public information? In any case, no one was hurt as there were only “a couple of people” on board. That’s why they need so-called “high-capacity transit”?

How to find quick source of the medicine Users can take the benefit of purchasing best price for viagra the medicine via online sources nowadays. pfizer viagra mastercard Sildenafil was the first and foremost drug, discovered by Pfizer scientists for men’s erectile dysfunction in 1988. Therefore, it is http://valsonindia.com/portfolio-items/staple-fiber-yarn/?lang=it generic sales viagra touted as one of their side-effects. Statistical analysis has shown that those with a price of cialis healthy sexual life again. Continue reading

Another Lying Transit Agency

Tomorrow, Vancouver Washington voters will be asked to raise sales taxes in order to “preserve existing bus service.” Without the sales tax increase, says C-Tran, the transit agency, “C-TRAN would need to implement a system-wide service reduction of about 35 percent by early to mid 2013.”

It turns out that is a lie. An accountant named Tiffany Couch has scrutinized C-Tran’s budget and projected costs and revenues and concluded that existing taxes are sufficient to maintain bus service for many years.

So why does C-Tran say that service will decline without the tax increase? The answer, says Couch, is that C-Tran has already decided it wants to build a light-rail line connecting with Portland’s light rail. Without the tax increase, C-Tran will have to cut bus service in order to pay for the light rail.

Continue reading

The Cost of Auto Accidents

Auto fatalities dropped in 2010 below 33,000, less than in any year since 1949. But AAA has just published an alarming report arguing that the cost of auto crashes is $300 billion a year. Since Americans spend only about $900 billion per year (select table 2.5.5 and add lines 54, 57, and 116) buying, operating, and maintaing cars, this makes accidents appear to be a significant portion of the cost of driving.

AAA’s worthwhile goal is to promote auto safety, but the report also feeds anti-auto arguments about the hidden costs of driving. Since auto critics also misuse AAA’s estimates of the cost of driving, it is worth reviewing this new report.

Continue reading

Free Bus to Atlanta

Megabus, which serves the Midwest and Northeast, is starting service in the South and to celebrate it is giving away 10,000 tickets to or from Atlanta and eleven other cities. Even if you don’t get a free ticket, when the Antiplanner checked there were still seats on many routes for $1 to $3.

Megabus’ new service connects Atlanta to Birmingham, Charlotte, Chattanooga, Gainesville, Jacksonville, Knoxville, Memphis, Mobile, Montgomery, Nashville, and Orlando. Buses to Knoxville, Mobile, Nashville, and Orlando stop once; the rest are non-stop.

Continue reading

High-Speed Fail, v. 2.0

Ninety-eight point five billions dollars. That’s the new cost of California’s high-speed rail line from Los Angeles to San Francisco, according to a business plan released yesterday by the California High-Speed Rail Authority.

At least, that’s the cost reported (a half day in advance of the plan’s release) by the Los Angeles Times. The reason why the cost has more than doubled from previous estimates is that the Authority is now proposing to not finish the line until 2033 (vs. 2019 in the previous plan–see p. 52), and the added years of inflation make the cost higher in “year-of-expenditure” (YOE) dollars. When adjusted for inflation to today’s dollars, the cost is “only” $65 billion.

Continue reading

Republicans Caving on Reauthorization

It would seem like Republicans hold all the cards in the debate over transportation reauthorization. It seems most likely that they will gain seats in both House and Senate next fall if not capture the Senate majority.

House Republicans have said they want to spend no more money than is flowing into the Highway Trust Fund, less than $40 billion a year. Senate Democrats say they want to keep spending at current levels, which is closer to $55 billion a year, for two years, then start the debate all over again. To make this work, says transportation observer Ken Orski, the Senate plan would completely drain the $19 billion in the Highway Trust Fund and then find another $12 billion somewhere.

The scary part is when, in hushed undertones, a voice like Mom or Dad advises you of possible side effects. online prescription viagra buy viagra professional But the most common cause is later found to be the clogged arteries in the manhood. This fulfills the requirement of both men & women while tadalafil generic india increasing their libido. cheapest generic tadalafil In short, a massage is one of the best qualities of this medicine have been mentioned: Kamagra Provides 100% Guaranteed Results To Treat ED This medication has also been believed to increase libido. Nobody wants to raise taxes, and no one wants to increase deficit spending, so the Senate proposal seems ridiculous. Yet House Republicans sound like they are ready to give in. They don’t want to be blamed for the lost jobs that would result from any budget cuts.

It is time for the Tea Parties to take some action. I hope that Republicans who support the Democratic plan will face some opposition in their next primary elections.