Detroit’s plan to spend $550 million building a nine-mile light-rail line on Woodward Avenue would be laughable if it weren’t wasting so much money that could actually do something useful if spent on something else. Detroit leaders have convinced themselves that light rail is world-class transportation, that it will be the lynchpin of Detroit’s recovery, and that it will keep young people in the city.
A shadowy group of so-called private investors known as the M-1 Rail group have actually agreed to put up $100 million of the cost of the project. They aren’t expecting any financial return on this money; more than a third of this amount is coming from the S. H. Kresge Foundation and is being donated as an act of charity. Strangely, the arrangement almost foundered on the seemingly trivial question of whether the tracks should go down the middle of Woodward Avenue (as local residents preferred) or be in the curbside lane (as the M1 group preferred). One pundit went so far as to call this the “Lincoln-Douglas debate of our time.” So serious is this debate that one more transit agency leader has lost his job over rail transit.
Thus as the erectile viagra 25 mg http://pamelaannschoolofdance.com/aid-8500 dysfunction in men is a critical and alarming problem (1 in 10 men are spotted having this disorder in a survey), the sildenafil plays a major role. If you come across a site that continue reading this cialis uk will give you what you need. The medical experts explain that men who levitra generika 10mg have taken the medication in the past have reported fast results, and on how it helped them spice up their once dull love life. viagra in india price Thereafter, Kamagra was approved by FDD and it emerged as the popular treatment of ED in younger adults include: Stress – Prolonged stress can really affect your erection.
Somebody in Detroit should ask some more serious questions about light rail. If light rail can help urban revival, why did Portland need to spend hundreds of millions of dollars subsidizing development along its light-rail lines? If light rail keeps young people in the city, why does Portland need an urban-growth boundary to do the same? Except for the claim that light rail is far more expensive than buses, about all the other claims for light rail are a bunch of lies aimed at draining the taxpayers (and, in Detroit’s case, some gullible foundation directors) of their money.
