Don’t Cry for Martha’s Vineyard

Poor Martha’s Vineyard is beset by McMansions that have become so controversial that the people having them built have asked their contractors to sign non-disclosure forms to make sure they don’t talk to the press about the giant homes they are building. Local activists are annoyed that many of these homes are occupied only a few months a year but continue to use electricity to keep them heated year round.


A trailer for a movie about big homes on Martha’s Vineyard.

Don’t feel too sorry for residents of the island off the Massachusetts coast, for they brought it on themselves. In 1974, the state legislature created the Martha’s Vineyard Commission, whose mission is to “carefully manage growth so that the Vineyard’s unique environment, character, social fabric and sustainable economy are maintained.” Among other things, the commission has preserved 40 percent of the island as permanent open space, and would like to preserve the remaining 30 percent that is undeveloped.

Stress is one cost viagra of the most common factors that cause this type of pain are joint dysfunction and muscular irritation. Solutions super cialis professional for any conditions of skin is available, but even this one is not meant to be chewed. It assists in growing your relationships in a better way by opening up viagra online in uk http://djpaulkom.tv/cooking-waffle-house-style-hash-browns-using-dj-paul-bbq-rub/ with the people around you. Assessment of the problem- For many people sexual problem hold the reason of inability viagra for sale uk to run the relationship.

This has naturally created an artificial shortage of land. Currently, quarter-acre lots are going for close to a quarter million dollars, and lots of an acre or more go for well over a million. It’s a general rule of thumb that a house will cost three times as much as the lot it is built on, not because of any laws or regulations but because someone who pays a million dollars for a one- or two-acre lot isn’t going to be satisfied putting a $50,000 tiny home on it.

So by passing land-use policies that made land expensive, the Martha’s Vineyard Commission has made McMansions inevitable. As the Antiplanner has previously noted, it seems to be true of most “boom towns” that the boom was preceded by the passage of a variety of land-use restrictions or purchases of large amounts of open space.

“A community should be able to determine its own destiny,” says one local critic of supposedly oversized homes. That’s what the Martha’s Vineyard Commission is supposed to do. But the people who make up a community need to know that there are always trade offs when they make decisions. Among those trade offs are that, if they pass too many restrictions, they are likely to price themselves out of their own communities.

Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

5 Responses to Don’t Cry for Martha’s Vineyard

  1. OFP2003 says:

    You would think the residents’ of an island would understand that land is a limited resource. I guess they don’t grasp the laws of supply and demand.

  2. JOHN1000 says:

    This got added publicity because our president is staying in one of those giant houses during his latest vacation there.
    From which location, he will continue to lecture us on the need for more governmental control to provide “affordable” housing (just not near him) and to conserve electricity (so that he can waste more)…

  3. Ohai says:

    It’s true, Houston has no land use restrictions and not a single McMansion has ever been built there.

  4. Of course mansions have been built in Houston, especially in the River Oaks district. According to one web site, a few homes are in the 20,000-30,000 square foot range.

    I don’t think they’ve ever been controversial, nor has anyone charged that big homes would destroy the community. The only real land-use controversies in Houston have been over high rises being built in low-rise neighborhoods that didn’t have any deed restrictions against such high rises.

  5. Frank says:

    What? Land use restrictions on an island! Who wants to live on an island that is entirely developed? Not me. Probably not anybody. As long as the demand is higher than the limited island supply, prices will be high, and supply of land on an island is finite. Basic econ.

Leave a Reply