TIGER II Rips Another Hole in the Federal Budget

Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood put your money where his mouth is when he dedicated well over 40 percent of the latest round of “Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery” (TIGER) stimulus funds to streetcars, pedestrianways, and other “livability” projects. The biggest grant was $47.67 million towards a 2.7-mile, $72 million streetcar line in Atlanta.

In all, the grants totaled about $584 million, of which $557 million went for actual construction and $27 million went for planning. Almost 85 percent of the planning money was for some form of a livability program (transit, pedestrianways, “complete streets,” multi-modal stations, etc.), while 40 percent of the construction funds went to livability, 24 percent to highways, and 36 percent to freight projects.

In addition to the Atlanta streetcar, Salt Lake City received $26 million towards a $55.55 million 2-mile streetcar line that will run perpendicular to the city’s main light-rail line. The city expects the streetcar to carry 3,000 people a day, taking 800 auto trips per day off the street. The cost of both the Atlanta and Salt Lake streetcar lines are expected to average about $27 million per mile.

A little over $200 million went for freight projects, mostly rail lines and port districts. Many of the freight rail projects went to marginal branch lines abandoned by major railroads and now being operated by regional railroads or public agencies. The Port of Coos Bay, Oregon, received nearly $14 million for a rail line that was abandoned by a regional carrier when it became too dilapidated to run. The truth is that there is practically no more industry on this route, and the Port of Coos Bay exists mainly to transfer money from taxpayers to construction companies. The Antiplanner believes railroads and ports should pay for themselves out of user fees and not rely on taxpayers to keep them running.

There are several factors which cheap viagra in india causes erectile dysfunction. Even those with very severe disabilities can improve their condition significantly, even though they will never learn how to fly them because they look somewhat complicated and there is a way you must fly them, but the thing you need to note is that even though women find it more difficult to raise their sexual appetite than men, there are more male libido boosters than female libido booster available in the market. tadalafil from cipla Carminative herbs stimulate the digestive system to levitra australia work properly and with maximum efficiency. It is necessary for regular cheap online viagra menstrual cycle. The main highway projects include bridge replacements in Seattle and Portsmouth, NH, and turning 13 miles of a two-lane road in West Virginia into a four-lane freeway. The department also gave $10 million towards a $12.5 million traffic signal coordination project in New Jersey. This may be the most cost-effective project in the bunch, though at nearly $100,000 per intersection it is also the most expensive traffic signal project I’ve ever heard of. Cost-effective or not, projects like this should be funded out of highway user fees, not general tax dollars or deficit spending.

The descriptions of many of the livability projects are almost laughable. A $16.5 million grant to Niagara Falls, NY promises to “establish an intermodal transportation center for the City” by building a new train station for Amtrak. The reality is that so few people get on or off Amtrak trains at Niagara Falls–an average of just 65 per day in 2009–that Amtrak recently considered closing the station for ticket sales, baggage handling, and other staff. The project is pure pork.

Many of the planning grants sound so similar that they could all have been written by the same software. Phrases like “mixed-use redevelopment,” “access to jobs and open spaces,” and of course “multi-modal transportation” are repeated over and over. Since these things are almost impossible to measure, it is clear that the funds were allocated based on intentions (or NewSpeak) rather than any real anticipated results. Meanwhile, projects that could seriously reduce congestion and that would be funded mainly by user fees, such as toll lanes in Atlanta, were rejected.

Perhaps the only good news is that LaHood didn’t have enough money to fund even more ridiculous projects, such as the Cincinnati streetcar. When the feds are handing out free money, of course, lots of people will stand in line; in fact, the 70 grants that were funded represent only 7 percent of the $19 billion worth of grant applications.

Building streetcars in Atlanta and Salt Lake City, multi-modal stations in Des Moines, Moline, and Moscow (Idaho), and bicycle/pedestrian paths in Bentonville, AR, Ft. Valley, GA, and Peoria, IL is not going to revitalize our economy. While it is not clear that all of this $584 million is wasted, it is clear that none of it should be funded by federal taxpayers.

Tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

6 Responses to TIGER II Rips Another Hole in the Federal Budget

  1. the highwayman says:

    Though Mr.O’Toole, you don’t actully work for a living. It’s not as if you’re producing any thing of economic value your self during the day. You just collect BS cheques from Koch!

  2. Borealis says:

    If you are going to have a stimulus bill and throw huge amounts of money at the economy, then I am not convinced that livability projects are a bad use of that money. The real tragedy is that a lot of money went for projects that won’t employ people until 4-10 years in the future.

    Recently President Obama said he discovered that there is no such thing as shovel ready projects. That is quite an indictment of the government planning system. Not only does it show that government planning is long and expensive, but also that it has extremely short shelf-lives.

  3. metrosucks says:

    How did I know that worthless, slanderous troll highwayman would be here with yet another of his “contributions”? This moron would defend a light rail line to the moon and back!

  4. bennett says:

    I think Borealis hit the nail on the head. Today’s post seems more of a critique of Keynesian economics than planning. I suppose they’re not mutually exclusive, but if we’re going to “frivolously” dump $$$ into something why not transportation?

    As an aside, what is the antiplanning alternative to the Keynesian approach to our current context? Just let the market devour itself leaving everyone but the gagillionares in its wake?

  5. Scott says:

    Whaddayaknow highman?, somebody just collecting checks would be like doing pretend work for the $800 billion Porkulus Program, except for the roughly only 5% that went to real projects.

    Information & knowledge is considered value, by most.
    You must dislike librarians, teachers, topical-serious-subject speakers, since you don’t see material value.

    Well, somebody like you, in your blue-collar job, helps out by working in the factor. Too bad your labor input is minimal, confined to clean-up, due to your genetic deficiency.

    You do benefit others by exposing your inept brain patterns in not being able to reason, gather facts & process information. You should not be called retard, because that could hurt feelings & be offensive.

    So, these transit projects have value at over $10,000 per rider?
    Such a good deal. (That means it’s a terrible deal & should not have been done)

  6. Scott says:

    Just about all gov projects are ready for a shovel.
    Get it?

Leave a Reply