Is the EPA Confiscating SUVs?

Recently, the Antiplanner suggested that electronics the Obama administration wants to mandate in all new cars would allow government bureaucrats to turn off your car if they thought you were driving too much. Even I wondered if that was a bit over the top, but last week, Fox News broadcast a disturbing report that the Environmental Protection Agency had confiscated people’s sport-utility vehicles for polluting the air.

If this report is true, it certainly would help make my case that we should be wary of government-mandated electronic controls in our cars. However, it turns out there a few minor errors in the Fox report: First, it wasn’t the EPA. Second, the car wasn’t confiscated because it polluted (or, at least, not just because it polluted). Third, it didn’t even happen in South Carolina.

The issue was previously reported by WBTV, a television station in Charlotte, North Carolina (see below). The owners of the car in question, the Brinkleys, live in Statesville, NC, which is near Winston-Salem and definitely is not in South Carolina.

Their car was a Land Rover Defender. Made primarily for other countries, most cars of this model do not meet federal safety and air pollution standards. A few thousand were made for import into the U.S., but most were not.

Cars made more than 25 years ago are exempt from the federal law, so dealers sometimes alter the vehicle identification numbers to make cars appear older than they really are (apparently, Land Rover doesn’t significantly change its models from year to year or even decade to decade). The North Carolina car is apparently suspected of being one of those cars.
tadalafil purchase online http://secretworldchronicle.com/2017/06/ Much of that blood remains in the penis, but it isn’t long enough to make their partner happy. Is online generic viagra it safe to consume Shilajit ES capsule? Yes. If wisdom is right here, right where we are, why are so few tadalafil cheap truly tapped in? Wisdom comes from a deep place inside us, where most people rarely visit. Men are not listening to “common side-effect” warnings about headaches, blurred vision, bluish vision, upset stomach, secretworldchronicle.com discount viagra cialis facial flushing, or reactions to light.
The confiscations, at least some of which took place on July 15, were first reported on a Land Rover discussion forum. This led Jalopnik to post an article saying a total of 40 Land Rovers had been seized.

Contrary to Fox News, there is no evidence that the Environmental Protection Agency was involved. Instead, the cars were confiscated by Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, a branch of the Department of Homeland Security. This could be as much for safety issues such as headlights, seat belts, bumpers, and roll bars as for air pollution issues.

Though the safety and air pollution laws are federal, they are normally enforced by the states, which should refuse to register cars that don’t comply with federal laws. Instead of swooping in and confiscating peoples’ cars, the federal government could have asked the states to confirm that the cars met federal standards before re-registering them. Though Wired notes that the feds have previously sent such illegally imported cars to the crusher, the confiscation remains disturbing even if the EPA wasn’t involved.

Apparently, the real target of the federal investigation was a Wilmington, NC, dealer who allegedly illegally imported vehicles and then changed their ID numbers. “The vehicle owners, who are victims of this criminal scheme, will have an opportunity to seek restitution for their losses,” an official with Immigration and Customs told Jalopnik–though that restitution would probably have to come from the unscrupulous dealer, and the Brinkleys might have trouble getting anything as they apparently are three or four sales removed from the dealer.

The Brinkleys insist their car was made in 1985, which would make it old enough to be exempt from the law. But Land Rover did not start using the “Defender” badge until 1991, so there’s something fishy about that story. They bought their car used, so it is easily possible the seller deceived them or had been deceived by a previous owner. The Brinkleys also claim that, after buying it, they spent $20,000 bringing it up to federal standards; good luck on recovering that from the dealer.

The various reports say the owners of the seized cars are challenging the action in court. While they are no doubt appealing the confiscations, the court documents cited in many of the reports were actually federal documents, not from a lawsuit brought by the car owners. Jalopnik says the documents show that the feds targeted 61 vehicles, but perhaps they only found 40 of them.

Apparently, no one at Fox or other news outlets, with the exception of Jalopnik, has made any effort to find the other 39 owners, or to find out if any of the confiscated cars actually met federal standards, or why, if they did not, the states registered them. This could be a good example of the unduly heavy hand of the federal government, but more information is needed to make the story credible.

Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

7 Responses to Is the EPA Confiscating SUVs?

  1. Fred_Z says:

    Were the USA still a civilized nation, the owners of this car would be sent a letter telling them of the problem and giving some reasonable time to get the vehicle altered so it complies or get the vehicle out of the country.

    The real story here is that eventually the state always elects the punitive, draconian, violent solution.

  2. paul says:

    Also a good reason not to watch Fox news who are not bothering to fact check.

  3. letsgola says:

    Since the Anti-Planner is frequently seen citing statistics on how much less pollution cars emit than they used to, I’m surprised he seems so willing to give these vehicle owners a pass.

    I suppose we could say that the feds should just insist that the states refuse to re-register the cars. Of course, it’s not like states in the South have a problem flouting federal laws, so what if the state ignored the request? I suppose the feds could say they’ll deny highway funds to the state… and then Fox News can get all worked up about that instead.

  4. Frank says:

    “Since the Anti-Planner is frequently seen citing statistics on how much less pollution cars emit than they used to, I’m surprised he seems so willing to give these vehicle owners a pass.”

    Non-sequitur.

  5. C. P. Zilliacus says:

    It is illegal to import motor vehicles less than 25 years old to the United States unless they conform to U.S./Canadian standards for safety and emissions. I very much support these standards, for they (and not efforts to force people to live “carfree” or “Portland” lifestyles) have greatly improved air quality across the U.S.

    Regarding the Land Rover Defender and other cars not marketed in North America, that issue could be dealt with if the U.S., Canada and the EU would come up with a common set of safety and emissions standards for motor vehicles. The goals are already the same.

    U.S. Customs and Border Protection is pretty clear about hassles and risks associated with importing vehicles here.

    Money quote:

    A Word of Caution

    Both the DOT and the EPA advise that although a nonconforming car may be conditionally admitted, the modification required to bring it into compliance may be so extensive and costly that it may be impractical and even impossible to achieve such compliance. It is highly recommended that these prohibitions and modifications be investigated before a vehicle’s purchased for importation.

  6. C. P. Zilliacus says:

    letsgola wrote:

    Since the Anti-Planner is frequently seen citing statistics on how much less pollution cars emit than they used to, I’m surprised he seems so willing to give these vehicle owners a pass.

    Nonsense.

    I think you have a misunderstanding about scale.

    Even if a few dirty vehicles were to get in to the United States (and more than a few antique cars legally on U.S. roads dating back to the Ford Model T and Model A because they comply with the standards in effect then) are very dirty in terms of emissions, they constitute a very small percentage of the vehicle fleet, and they generate a very small percentage of vehicle miles traveled.

  7. Frank says:

    Well, this whole no letting in old vehicles totally ruins my plan of importing a Soviet Lada and restoring it.

    For those of you who don’t know the Lada, the socialist car, here are some facts:

    What do you call a Lada driver who says he has a speeding ticket?
    A liar

    What do you call a Lada at the top of a hill?
    A miracle

    What do you call a 100 Ladas at the top of a hill?
    A car factory

    What’s the difference between a Jehovah’s Witness and a Lada?
    You can shut the door on a Jehovah’s Witness

    How do you double the value of a Lada?
    Fill the petrol tank

    How do you make a policeman laugh?
    Tell him your Lada just got stolen

    Too bad the socialists are banning my dreams of bringing a socialist car to Amurica!

    Yeay, Socialism!

Leave a Reply