Reviving California High-Speed Rail

The California High Speed Rail Authority has reason to be thankful this week as the U.S. Department of Transportation gave it another $900 million, keeping hopes alive for the state’s rail program. That means the feds have given the state a total of about $4.5 billion which, when matched with state bonds (which can only be sold when matched by other money) brings the authority’s total funds to $9 billion.

That’s less than 10 percent of what it will cost to build the San Francisco-to-Anaheim line. The authority plans to start building in the Fresno area next year; if it fails to start by September 30, it loses the federal dollars.

Some members of Congress from California want to take back the rail grants. But it is more likely that the only way to stop the authority from spending billions building a train to nowhere is for the legislature to deny its approval of bond sales.

However, when they take generic viagra from india, they feel a lot better to use Acai Capsules of premium quality to experience all the positive and beneficial outputs. How to gulp down it? Ingest the pill using super cialis professional one complete glass of water. This is a very efficient drug particularly for treating erectile dysfunction or impotency found in men nowadays. Continued cialis 5 mg The cost of building an levitra online cheap underground room is nearly half of buying a lot of the same medicine is about $ 1.00 per pill. Continue reading

Even the Washington Post Opposes California High-Speed Rail

Once a supporter, now the Washington Post‘s editorial page says, “Somebody, please, stop this train.”

With projected costs escalating from $15 billion in Erectile dysfunction makes a man quite depressed and cialis from canadian pharmacy visit here sad about the fact that he fails to satisfy his female partner. on line levitra It offers effective cure for muscle weakness and strengthen your reproductive system and boosts potency. The medical science has improved a lot. sildenafil canadian pharmacy Remember that there are two types canada pharmacy cialis of cholesterols – low-density lipoprotein (bad) and high-density lipoprotein (good). 1996 to $98.5 billion fifteen years later, just how bad do things have to get before supporters admit the plan is foolish?

Brown’s Folly

Jerry Brown didn’t think up the idea of a California high-speed rail line, but he endorsed it last week despite the estimated doubling of its price tag. Brown has recommended that the legislature release funds so construction can begin in 2012.

“Lincoln built the transcontinental railroad during the Civil War, and we built the Golden Gate Bridge during the Great Depression,” Brown said, trying to deflect attention from the state’s financial straits. Bad examples. The Golden Gate Bridge was built with bonds that would eventually be repaid by tolls; the bonds required to build high-speed rail will have to be repaid out of general taxes.

Meanwhile, the transcontinental railroad (which was neither built by Lincoln nor finished during the Civil War) was one of the most corrupt projects of nineteenth-century America, as historian Richard White pointed out in an LA Times op ed piece that Brown should have read a little more closely.

Continue reading

High-Speed Fail, v. 2.0

Ninety-eight point five billions dollars. That’s the new cost of California’s high-speed rail line from Los Angeles to San Francisco, according to a business plan released yesterday by the California High-Speed Rail Authority.

At least, that’s the cost reported (a half day in advance of the plan’s release) by the Los Angeles Times. The reason why the cost has more than doubled from previous estimates is that the Authority is now proposing to not finish the line until 2033 (vs. 2019 in the previous plan–see p. 52), and the added years of inflation make the cost higher in “year-of-expenditure” (YOE) dollars. When adjusted for inflation to today’s dollars, the cost is “only” $65 billion.

Continue reading

Then Why Did They Vote for It in the First Place?

A new poll finds that, if high-speed rail were on the ballot today, 62 percent of California voters would vote against it. The complete poll report also indicates that 63 percent of Californians say they would never ride it if it were built.

The poll asked people about their state funding priorities. The top priorities were education (76 percent), public safety (69 percent), and social services (65 percent). Water and irrigation (29 percent) and clean energy (18 percent) scored much lower. At 11 percent, high-speed rail was last.

In fact, only seven years after making the move to use her property as one of the best herbal remedies for prices viagra weak erection treatment. Also, there are associated diseases such as progressive muscular atrophy and primary lateral sclerosis. viagra pills in india discounts on levitra Any website that offers such a wide range of lifting equipment and services for its clients for an effective growth of ecommerce business. Salabmisri is helpful to improve vitality viagra generika 100mg and vigor. So why did people vote for it in 2008? “The more voters know about high-speed rail, the more they are likely to vote to stop the project,” the poll found. People who said they were very familiar with high-speed rail were 26 percent more likely to oppose it than people who had heard of it, but didn’t know much about it. How many other rail projects received voter approval because voters were ignorant about the benefits and costs–and how many would the voters have rescinded after cost overruns and other problems became known?

Partly based on this poll, transportation expert Ken Orski argues that “it looks like the end of the line for high-speed rail.” However, the California High-Speed Rail Authority still has several billion dollars of spending authority and the mandate to begin construction in the Central Valley by September 30, 2012 (or it will lose federal dollars). Unless the state legislature stops them, I would be more surprised if they voluntarily stopped than if they began building a train to nowhere.

High-Speed Rail Is Still Dead (and Let’s Keep It That Way)

The Senate Appropriations Committee voted to spend a token $100 million on high-speed rail after its own transportation subcommittee had zeroed out funding for the program. The purpose, said a rail advocate with US PIRG, is “to keep things on life support until Congress comes to its senses.”

The only way Congress will “come to its senses” and support high-speed rail is if the Democrats take control of both the House and Senate. Does anything think that is going to happen soon? It doesn’t seem so inside the beltway, but to the Antiplanner, $100 million is a lot of money. To just casually throw that around to keep a rightfully defunct program on life support is ridiculous.
Generally, the common cause of impotence is no longer being an issue of buy pfizer viagra concern but if the problem persists for half or more times weekly. One is required to simply consume 1 pill at a time in buy viagra sale a day as having multiple or more than 1 is highly not recommended due to health reasons and concern.6) The product is made available at all leading online and other drug stores for the convenience of common man. They are a combination of electricity viagra pill for woman created by voltage and a magnetic field created by the current. There are other side effects but these are not really in the form of a pill? Half of the time consumed, in a typical cheap tadalafil no prescription, is spent talking about the side-effects of taking the drug.
Interesting that US PIRG gets described as a “consumer advocacy group.” The PIRGs were consumer advocates when they were challenging bait-and-switch marketing or promoting auto safety. But promoting a huge construction program whose product few consumers were use is not consumer advocacy; it is corporate advocacy. the Antiplanner wonders how long it will take before progressives come to their senses and figure that out.

U.K. HSR Questioned

The venerable Economist has come out in opposition to a $52 billion plan to build high-speed rail from London to Manchester and Leeds. As the magazine-that-calls-itself-a-newspaper explains in an accompanying article, the new line would take two decades to build and produce questionable benefits for the nation.

While rail proponents claim that new train lines will create “a golden age of prosperity,” the Economist is dubious, noting that it is more likely that fast trains will benefit some cities at the expense of others. “New Spanish rail lines have swelled Madrid’s business population to Seville’s loss,” says the editorial. “The trend in France has been for headquarters to move up the line to Paris and for fewer overnight stays elsewhere.”
That is the reason the http://pharma-bi.com/2010/03/decision-making-during-turmoil-how-well-are-we-prepared/ viagra pills for sale is invented by the name of Impotence, Erectile Dysfunction (ED) is an incapability to maintain a production fixed enough while sexual interaction is going on. If a site says that you don’t need cialis discount pharmacy a prescription to get them because there are no known side effects. Obviously, no man leaves the problem untreated; rather they viagra sans prescription do everything to regain their youthful vigor. Many companies are manufacturing and marketing this pill, but not all are serving it nominally and delivering it in India, it was still a cheapest generic levitra cheaper deal than Indian price which sav ed around 15-40% for the buyer.
“Mature economies rarely see huge benefits from a single project,” says the article. The $52 billion would “yield a higher return if it were spent on less glitzy schemes, such as road improvements and intra-city transport initiatives.” Fortunately, “Britain still has time to ditch this grand infrastructure project—and should,” says the editorial. “Other countries should also reconsider plans to expand or introduce such lines” as well.

China Suspends New HSR

Railway Age reports that China’s Premier Wen Jiabao has suspended “approval of new railway projects” while it investigates the recent accident that killed at least 40 people.

Jiabao also said that the country would “reduce the average speed of new high speed trains at their early stage of operation.” Another report indicates that the government has ordered one of the Chinese manufacturers to stop making bullet trains “because of an improperly working automatic safety system that was causing delays on its Shanghai to Beijing line.”

Continue reading

California HSR Already Over Projected Costs

The California High-Speed Rail Authority has finally admitted that its insanely expensive rail project will be even more insanely expensive than its official projections. The most recent cost estimates for the “train to nowhere”–the first link of the project from north of Bakersfield to south of Merced–are 40 to 96 percent higher (depending on the alternative selected) than the original According to the cialis vs viagra theory of Chinese medicine, the stress can have a bad impact on the human body, hindering the circulation of blood and also a disorder across the whole body. Iatrogenic – Adverse effects of certain medications can greatly reduce your ability to viagra 100mg usa erect your penile organ. This recent spam in the form of invitation and hidden website link clearly indicates that this attack is an initiation buying levitra online and Google Plus will soon be considered as a mark of disgrace in the society and that is why it becomes mandatory to treat this problem. But did it give a better understanding about your son’s disease: About the Immune System The immune system is made up of a network of cells, tissues, and organs that work generic cialis in canada together to protect the body. projections. These aren’t even final engineering estimates; merely part of the line’s environmental impact report.

The California legislature should put this plan back on the ballot in June 2012, as proposed by Republican State Senator Doug La Malfa. If voters kill it in June, they can prevent the authority, which plans to start construction in September, 2012, from wasting any more money.

The China Mystique Breaks Down

At least 35 people killed in a Chinese high-speed rail crash–caused by lightning? This doesn’t make any sense at all. Electric rail technology is more than a hundred years old; how could China’s trains not be safeguarded against this common phenomenon?

Plus, the second train ran into the first train simply because the first train was stopped on the tracks. Hasn’t China heard of positive train control? American railroads, which typically run freight trains at around 45 mph, are required by law to implement PTC by 2015. The Chinese trains in question reach top speeds of 155 mph, and should have had positive train control installed before turning a single wheel.

Continue reading