A Washington Post writer observes that a roundtrip Amtrak ticket from DC to New York is $140 or more, while there are buses that go the same route for only $20 each way. Unlike Amtrak, the buses have leather seats and free WiFi, and they take only an hour longer than the train.
The Antiplanner made much the same point in an op ed recently published in the Cleveland Plain-Dealer: All American taxpayers will share the cost of a national high-speed rail network, but its use will be limited mainly to the wealthy and those whose employers pay the cost.
Kamagra Oral Jelly remains one of the most affordable medications for erectile dysfunction, especially amongst men who are looking for a mouthsofthesouth.com women viagra australia little extra when performing in bed. These herbs are perfectly blended and processed in the concoction of click now tadalafil price Gokhru, Ashwagandha, Semal Musli and Akarkra. PDE-5 is an enzyme which hinders the erectile functioning, which when inhibited results in better erectile functioning.The medicine discount generic cialis then increases the production of cGMP which increases blood volume. What’s worse, the interaction between immune and cancer stem cells will support purchase levitra tumor cell proliferation and cell apotheosis. The Washington Post failed to mention that the trains are heavily subsidized while the buses are not — yet the buses still manage to charge much lower fares. Of course, the buses will use interstate freeways most of the way, but those interstates were 100 percent funded out of gas taxes and other user fees.
“Interstates paid for themselves out of gas taxes, and most Americans use them almost every day,” says the op ed. “Moderate or high-speed rail would require everyone to subsidize trains that would serve only a small elite.” Is it ironic or just inevitable that the Democratic Party, which likes to to think of itself as the party of the common people, supports policies that take from the poor and middle-class and give to the rich?
