Amtrak Picks New CEO, Gets Loan Grant

Amtrak has selected former Norfolk Southern CEO Charles Moorman to be its new president and CEO. Moorman will take the reigns from career bureaucrat Joseph Boardman this week.

Rail industry insiders were surprised when Boardman decided to step down in the middle of his contract. But, according to Trains magazine’s Don Philips (no link available), Boardman had alienated other officials in the organization with angry tirades and poor management.

Boardman leaves the organization with one victory: Amtrak has successfully negotiated a $2.45 billion loan from the Federal Railroad Administration. The funds will be used to buy new trains and upgrade the Northeast Corridor to operate at top speeds of 160 mph instead of the current 135 mph. Amtrak claims it will repay the loan out of revenues earned from the additional riders attracted to the new trains and higher speeds.

It is easy to be skeptical of this claim, however. Under Boardman, Amtrak shifted operating costs to maintenance and overhead in order to make Northeast Corridor trains appear profitable. While maintenance and overhead are essential for operations, Amtrak (along with the transit bureaucracy) counts maintenance as a capital cost. This shift allowed Amtrak to claim its trains were doing so well that it was seeking lower operating subsidies from Congress even as it sought much higher capital subsidies to do maintenance. Amtrak says it has a $7 billion maintenance backlog, and predictably, little or none of the $2.45 billion will be spent reducing that backlog.

If Amtrak doesn’t have enough money to maintain its tracks (most of which are in the Northeast Corridor), how will it find enough to also repay the loan? The answer is slight of hand: it will repay the loan with operating revenues that should be going into maintenance while it demands that Congress give it more money for maintenance. Under the terms of the loan, Amtrak doesn’t even have to start repaying it until 2022.

Regular use of Booster capsule offers the pdxcommercial.com tadalafil cialis from india best ayurvedic cure to treat penile dysfunction. To treat erectile dysfunction generic viagra from usa in case of the treatment of this rare disease, you have to take daily. The first crucial and secret step in curing of the cialis pills effects of ringing of the ears is to pin down the cause of tinnitus. And, when blood arteries get affected due to any reason and those are not able to smoothly flow the blood, men face trouble in getting an erection, pdxcommercial.com cheap viagra which in turn hinders sexual performance. This is not the first time Amtrak has cooked the books and it probably won’t be the last. Boardman is also being lauded for Amtrak’s record ridership, but in fact that was back in 2012. Measured in passenger miles, Amtrak ridership has declined in every year since then, including 2015 and so far in 2016.

Another lie is the claim that it will speed trains to 160 mph between Boston and Washington. The reality is some of the $2.45 billion will be spent improving a short stretch of track between Washington and Baltimore, but this is likely to shave no more than a few minutes off its train times. Between New York and Washington, the current average speed of Amtrak’s fastest “high-speed” Acela is 82 mph (though most are about 78 mph). This speed allows the Acela to attract less than 3 percent of travelers in the Northeast Corridor (all Amtrak trains together carry about 6 percent, less than half of which is on the Acela). Will the $2.45 billion loan allow Amtrak to boost that average speed to more than 85? Probably not.

As a former CEO of Norfolk Southern, Amtrak’s new president will bring an insider’s familiarity with the rail industry (which Boardman never really had) combined with an understanding of the political system. Headquartered in its namesake city in Virginia, Norfolk Southern was closer to Washington DC than any other major railway. Moorman’s selection brings back memories of Graham Claytor, who prior to being Amtrak president in the 1980s had been CEO of Norfolk Southern predecessor Southern Railway (and his brother was the first CEO of Norfolk Southern). Claytor was popular with Congress and was able to boost subsidies to Amtrak by claiming (falsely, as it turned out) that Amtrak would soon be profitable. Instead, he left behind a growing maintenance backlog.

Many rail advocates like to point out that there is no reason to expect Amtrak to be profitable but that we should subsidize it anyway because almost every other country in the world subsidizes their passenger trains. But the United States is not like every other country. Not only do we have a long history of demanding that transportation and other services stand on their own, most rail lines in the U.S. are privately owned.

The United States has, in fact, one of the most efficient rail industries in the world, because it is private. Private owners have dedicated their lines to freight, where rail really works best, whereas the publicly owned rail lines in other countries are dedicated to passengers, where rail is marginal. This is because politicians go for the glitz, not efficiency, and passenger trains are glitzier than freight.

Just as Amtrak’s ridership seems more dependent on gas prices than management, Amtrak’s future is more dependent on who gets elected to Congress. If Democrats take over both houses of Congress, then the floodgates are likely to open to expand service and maybe cover some of that maintenance backlog. Amtrak would also love to spend a few hundred billion dollars rebuilding the entire Northeast Corridor, although it will have to compete with Japan, which is spending $2 million to study a magnetic levitation train from Baltimore to Washington. No doubt this means it will spend $100,000 on the study and $1.9 million on lobbying for subsidies to the project. Maybe it should hire a former railroad executive to oversee it.

Tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

5 Responses to Amtrak Picks New CEO, Gets Loan Grant

  1. OFP2003 says:

    Ohh… you are a bad boy. Suggesting that Boardman should ride the B-W Mag Lev !!

    Just don’t get it. So I’m supposed to fight the traffic into DC, pay $20 to park, wait in lines to get on the Mag Lev, wait for it to leave, ride it for 30 minutes to Baltimore, wait in lines to get off, find a rental car/shared car/uber, and then fight traffic out of Baltimore to my final destination. And then REPEAT to get back home at the end of the day. Just drive around the beltway avoiding downtowns on both ends and it will be quicker and you can sit down in your ac car the whole time!

  2. C. P. Zilliacus says:

    The Antiplanner wrote:

    The funds will be used to buy new trains and upgrade the Northeast Corridor to operate at top speeds of 160 mph instead of the current 135 mph. Amtrak claims it will repay the loan out of revenues earned from the additional riders attracted to the new trains and higher speeds.

    What’s the matter? The fleet of Acela units worn-out already? Would it be cheaper to just send then for overhaul and not buy new trains?

    OFP2003 wrote:

    Just don’t get it. So I’m supposed to fight the traffic into DC, pay $20 to park, wait in lines to get on the Mag Lev, wait for it to leave, ride it for 30 minutes to Baltimore, wait in lines to get off, find a rental car/shared car/uber, and then fight traffic out of Baltimore to my final destination. And then REPEAT to get back home at the end of the day. Just drive around the beltway avoiding downtowns on both ends and it will be quicker and you can sit down in your ac car the whole time!

    IMO, it’s not really about MagLev service from Washington to Baltimore. It’s about MagLev service from Washington to Baltimore, Wilmington, Philadelphia, New York, New Haven, Providence and Boston. In other words a MagLev replacement of the Northeast Corridor, with the rolling stock and much of the other equipment built in Asia (Japan, Red China or South Korea)

  3. aloysius9999 says:

    August 2022

    DOT forgives $2.45B loan to Amtrak.

  4. OFP2003 says:

    C.P. Zillacus wrote:
    with the rolling stock and much of the other equipment built in Asia (Japan, Red China or South Korea)

    Okay, I got it.

  5. prk166 says:


    ust don’t get it. So I’m supposed to fight the traffic into DC, pay $20 to park, wait in lines to get on the Mag Lev, wait for it to leave, ride it for 30 minutes to Baltimore, wait in lines to get off, find a rental car/shared car/uber, and then fight traffic out of Baltimore to my final destination. And then REPEAT to get back home at the end of the day. Just drive around the beltway avoiding downtowns on both ends and it will be quicker and you can sit down in your ac car the whole time!
    ” ~ OFP2003

    That is why High Speed Rail ( HSR ), even by most of it’s die-hard advocates, should not be used on such short routes. No matter how fast the train may go, it can’t make up for a ll the other pieces of the actual trip. You probably realized this but I figured I’d point it out for others that may come across it.

    This is one of many, many, many examples of the advocates of High Speed Rail ( HSR ) saying to not build under 100 mile lines. In this case, they believe 250 miles is the sweet spot

    http://www.america2050.org/pdf/Where-HSR-Works-Best.pdf

    The city pairs were evaluated on the basis of the following
    criteria:
    • City and metropolitan area population, favoring cities
    with larger populations in large metropolitan areas.
    • Distance between city pairs, confined to distances
    between 100-500 miles, with 250 miles receiving the
    highest value.
    • Metropolitan regions with existing transit systems
    including regional rail, commuter rail and local transit
    networks.
    • Metropolitan GDP, awarding value based on the combined
    per-capita GDP.
    • Metropolitan regions with high levels of auto congestion
    as measured by the Texas Transportation Institute’s
    Travel Time Index.
    • Metropolitan regions that are located within a
    megaregion.

Leave a Reply