“Rail Line Drives Utah Development” trumpets an article in Sunday’s New York Times. The article tells of a $140 million mixed-use development being built along a Salt Lake City-area light-rail line.
It took me less than five minutes to find what was really driving this development. If you’ve been reading this blog for long, you should be able to guess it: tax-increment financing. Specifically, $24.6 million in infrastructure subsidies and $7.8 million in housing subsidies.
It also affects the buy pill viagra lives of women hence it is suggested strictly to avoid smoking to keep your performance up. Impotence is the failure of viagra super a man from two severe sexual difficulties that is premature ejaculation as well as erectile dysfunction. So if your penis is not getting enough blood, why do you think that is the case? Obviously because of some symptom or condition viagra canada pharmacy that is affecting your heart, isn’t it? There lays the big danger when dealing with communication problems, emotional insecurity, unresolved resentment, and inappropriate sexual meanings. The side effects of online levitra cheap online compose of light headedness, dizziness, vomiting, headache, diarrhea, nausea, fatigue etc.
The budget also includes nearly $2 million in “administrative costs” and $4.7 million of “education mitigation.” That last part is intended to placate the school district that would lose revenues due to the tax-increment financing. In other words, instead of sharing the pain of tax-increment financing with fire, police, library, and other services, the local schools had enough political muscle to demand funds that the others will not get.
In any case, the developers themselves effectively get $32.4 million of their $140 million project paid by the city. I suspect that, with that kind of subsidy, they would have been glad to do the project even without light rail. But “Subsidy drives Utah development” is not likely to make the New York Times.
