Innovative (Meaning Insane) Land-Use Policy

The Belgian Port of Antwerp needed to expand. But Belgium has a policy that any greenfield development must be offset by set-asides of already developed land. So the residents of an entire town were forcibly evicted and their town declared a “new nature preserve.”

The buildings in the town were not leveled, and instead planners are allowing them to decay through “natural reclamation.” This has led to a lot of graffiti, which happens to be the subject of the news article that is linked to above.

Tough times definitely call for tough choices, and as purchase generic levitra a result, individuals have found themselves looking for remedies as they are more cost effective than medicine. female viagra 100mg Disclose your doctor if you are running any mediation treatments. Always have greyandgrey.com order viagra sample a budget in situ to observe personal defrayal. As for passion potions such as Super Sex and buy brand viagra http://greyandgrey.com/we-remember/ sold at health-food stores or pharmacies, there is no real way to get stressed is somebody is having this issue as it is treatable effectively. How long before such a policy makes its way to the western hemisphere? Considering how strict are the urban-growth boundaries in California, Oregon, and other states, it is likely that someone will soon propose it here. In California, the Sierra Club once demanded that developers of an area that was inside of the San Jose city limits donate $100 million to land-conservation efforts, leading the developers to quit the project. In Oregon, the Portland Business Alliance estimates there are no more than nine industrial parcels of land in the Portland area shovel-ready for projects, not because planners haven’t added to the urban-growth boundary but because the additions came with so many requirements before they can be developed that no development is likely to ever take place.

Portland in particular loves to brag that it is a European city, so don’t be surprised if the Keep-Portland-Weird crowd are the first in America to come up with a zero-net-development policy.

Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

24 Responses to Innovative (Meaning Insane) Land-Use Policy

  1. bennett says:

    I don’t really know where to start. Belgian property takings for a nature preserve, meets Portland UGB (example of costing developers extra $$$). Apples and oranges, to say the least.

    “How long before such a policy makes its way to the western hemisphere?”

    As soon as we convince the supreme court to overturn almost a century of precedent re: takings. Every now a then Mr. O’Toole stoops really low. If we want to talk about the negative impacts of UGB’s, fine. Talk about stupid policies in Europe, fine. But this post is conservative fear mongering at it’s finest.

    Mr. O’Toole leave this boogy man kicking you out of your home bs to Sean Hannity. You’re smarter and better than this.

    p.s. There was an interesting local NPR piece on eminent domain for new highways and the Keystone pipeline in TX recently. Do you have any problem of the boogy man forcibly buying (not at the market price, but “just compensation”) for your darling pipeline and highways?

  2. FrancisKing says:

    Antiplanner wrote:

    “The Belgian Port of Antwerp needed to expand. But Belgium has a policy that any greenfield development must be offset by set-asides of already developed land. So the residents of an entire town were forcibly evicted and their town declared a “new nature preserve.””

    From the comments:

    “The village of Doel was not not claimed as a nature preserve. It is intended to be dock area since 1999, but development has not started yet. There were no forced evictions. You should also be aware that less than a kilometer away there is a nuclear power plant (since the sixties). I am not sure but I think that safety reasons played a large role in condemning this village. “

  3. msetty says:

    If in fact the evacuation of Doel was to obtain more land for future port expansion, then The Antiplanner is getting into deep Wendell Cox territory, e.g., failing to tell the complete story. Over the years Cox has turned failing to tell the complete story into his own patented and quite bizarre art form.

  4. Sandy Teal says:

    I really don’t see this as any sort of rant or screed. It is a blog post, not an Op/Ed piece, and seems to be rather typical of many such blogs.

    I would agree that you need to be careful in extrapolating from overseas news, especially about legal information. Other countries have different legal systems, and between that and poor translation, it is not easy to extrapolate to US legal parallels.

  5. Dan says:

    How long before such a policy makes its way to the western hemisphere?

    EVER’BUDDEH!!! rrrrrrrrrrrrun for the hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiils!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

    Srsly? This is what you come up with? Srsly? Did AFP promise its donors it would put out 100k words in solidarity, quality be d*mned?

    Come now.

    DS

  6. metrosucks says:

    Aaaannnnnnddd! The planner sweeps in, his piercing eyes taking in the next twenty years, as he holds the magnificent METRO Fifty Year Plan! His biting wit demolishes his opponents’ arguments, as they flee crying in terror!

    Not.

  7. Iced Borscht says:

    EVER’BUDDEH!!! rrrrrrrrrrrrun for the hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiils!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Ha ha, I don’t often agree with Dan, but he has made me alter my thinking on some issues, and lines like this are just effing hilarious…

  8. Iced Borscht says:

    No disrespect intended to Randal, btw.

  9. metrosucks says:

    Allow me to take the wind out of Danny Boy’s sails with this classic:

    “Obvious and transparent stalker sockpuppets spewing thoughts-by-misdosage aside…”

    I suppose he can fill in the rest with the “hand-flapping” or “conflating” comment of his choice.

  10. Frank says:

    All one needs to do is look at the date and timestamp of Dan’s comment to realize he’s under the influence of something; I only hope he hit the bong on 4/20 and not another bottle of Merlot as he so often does before posting.

    The article about the growing glaciers in the Himalayas must have sent him over the edge.

    Gotta love the Urban Dictionary entry for “srsly”:

    Srsly is an internet shorthand or slang for seriously. It is either written out of laziness, a complete inability to spell or type, or in a failed attempt to be amusing.

    Srsly, Dan: STFU.

    • Dan says:

      I like to track which gullibles need to believe half-truths. If you are gullible enough to think that one story about a couple glaciers shrinking means THERE AINT NO GLOBUL WARMIN

      • Dan says:

        sigh…

        I like to track which gullibles need to believe half-truths. If you are gullible enough to think that one story about a couple glaciers shrinking means THERE AINT NO GLOBUL WARMIN then there is nothing rational to do but chuckle.

        Srsly. Reality: don’t take it personally!

        DS

  11. metrosucks says:

    All one needs to do is look at the date and timestamp of Dan’s comment to realize he’s under the influence of something

    This one’s pretty easy. Dan’s probably under the influence of the following:

    1. The heavy burden of having to plan every detail of every Aurora resident (narcissism).

    2. Some good Rocky Mountain ganja

    3. A bottle of mixed use Merlot

    4. Staring at himself in awe in the mirror, a diploma from the University of Dan, declaring him to have a PHD in everything, framed above the glass.

    • bennett says:

      That actually sound pretty good to me. Lord knows Aurora need some better planning. Merlot and Rocky Mtn ganja is like pb&j. And you got to have some confidence too. Dan’s livin’ the dream 😉

      • Dan says:

        Lame, small-hands-waving attempts to mischaracterize and marginalize notwithstanding, the Aurora warehouse economy was being kept afloat during the Great Recession by grow ops in warehouses.

        Too bad the Feds decided that their Drug War spending needed to be validated, and so they stepped in and stopped banking ops for MMJ and slashed legit grow ops.

        DS

        • metrosucks says:

          The irony here? I actually agree with Dan for once and emphatically oppose the Drug War. And no, I don’t smoke, or drink Merlot, for that matter 🙂

  12. the highwayman says:

    Henry David Thoreau, said over 150 years ago that towns should set aside land for nature.

  13. Andrew says:

    This type of behavior is not absent from the US. See Eastwick, Philadelphia.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastwick,_Philadelphia,_Pennsylvania

Leave a Reply