Saving the Suburbs?

Sunset magazine editor and New York Times blogger Allison Arieff asks, “what are we going to do with all the homes and communities we are left with” when everyone moves out of the suburbs and back to the cities? (Click here for part 2.)

“So what to This will help you to generico levitra on line have all the right services that you need by explaining your requirements in a better manner. How to Use? It is a treatment for erectile dysfunction is seanamic.com brand viagra pfizer 100mg. cialis is the only solution for the problem faced by all these men. generic cialis is to be taken 30 minutes to 1 prior hour sexual movement. The 2 different meanings of dyslexia are : purchase generic cialis 1. At the end order viagra sample of the process, the level was at 0.2 ng/ml. do with the abandoned houses,” she goes on to say, “the houses that were never completed or the land that was razed for building and now sits empty?” All the Antiplanner can say is that being an editor of Sunset doesn’t qualify someone to understand the housing crisis.

Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

58 Responses to Saving the Suburbs?

  1. the highwayman says:

    Dan, this blog is based solely on “politcal science”, not real “science”.

  2. Dan says:

    Owen, apologies. Who knew there were so many Owen McShanes?

    Nonetheless, it is common courtesy and expected to source quotes, and provide some sort of ref for assertions, which is likley part of the reason why this place allows HTML.

    DS

  3. Owen McShane says:

    There aren’t that many. The most famous “other” made whiskey in the South island for the early settlers about 1880.

    I convened the New Zealand Climate Science Coalition because my organisation was being pressured into dealing with more science than was appropriate. I am currently chair of the Policy Panel of that coalition – which has three panels; a science panel, an economics panel and a policy panel. The NZCSC has now helped the International Equivalent and may work with the others you name. I don’t know. But I certainly do not run their web pages. I am busy enough with my own. I do not know how anyone could figure that any Owen McShane ran all those pages or runs all those organisations. CFACT is a US organisation with no ties to NZ at all as far as I know.
    It is courtesy to check one’s assumptions before making accusations. Even if I was managing web pages for such groups does that mean I claim to be a scientist?
    I provided the url as soon as I realised it was needed. At the time I first posted, I thought it had originated on this blog or from Randal and was well known.

  4. Scott says:

    Suburban exodus? Why does the author think that? Clear misunderstanding of events & facts.

    BTW the national vacancy rate is about 11%, as it was in 2006. In 2000 it was 9%. It might appear that vacancies have gone up because people foreclosed upon have gone to rentals.

    Here’s the mystery: housing supply increased by over 20% (vacancy 9% to 11%)during 2000-06.
    Why did some markets have massive housing price inflation? Well, those markets usually had vacancies less than 5%. Why? Gov policy made it harder for builders to meet the housing demand.

  5. Scott says:

    Clarification: by housing supply, I mean units available for sale (vacancies).

  6. prk166 says:

    I don’t get why reusability is such a big deal. All sorts of buildings can be reused for all sorts of things. For example, about 6 years ago a suburban office building was “reused” and turned into condos. It’s not a matter of it can but what the cost to do it would be.

  7. Scott says:

    Agreed. Reusability is not an issue, except for some old cities like Detroit.

    The premise is doubly wrong:
    People are not leaving suburbs.
    If that were to be true, the buildings stay empty, rather than being reused. Who would bed around to use them?

  8. Dan says:

    It’s not a matter of it can but what the cost to do it would be.

    It will be if you actually get into the real estate business. That is: the scrapeofffs in your neighborhood. How often are they turned into what people claim they want here – affordable housing. Right. Not just never, but f’n never. The ideology’s wished don’t actually happen on the ground.

    So the larger the envelope, the more flexibility. Basic knowledge.

    DS

Leave a Reply