Happy Independence Day

Today Americans celebrate independence from a foreign nation and, more generally, freedom from tyranny. Regular readers of the Antiplanner won’t have to guess what I think about that.

Fireworks over the Willamette River, July 3, 2007.
Flickr photo copyright 2007 by Sean Dreilinger.

All my life, I’ve wondered about the relationship between the individual and society. When do the needs of the community trump individual freedom? Henry David Thoreau gave his answer in his famous essay, Civil Disobedience:

“I please myself with imagining a State at least which can afford to be just to all men, and to treat the individual with respect as a neighbor; which even would not think it inconsistent with its own repose if a few were to live aloof from it, not meddling with it, nor embraced by it, who fulfilled all the duties of neighbors and fellow-men.”

Continue reading

People Don’t Plan

A news item refers to a recent research study that asks how far ahead people plan. The experiment asked people to make decisions at two points. Those who made what appeared to be the best decision at the first point found that they lost out at the second point. Only those who looked ahead to the second point would make the best decision at the first point.

The study found that 36 percent of people made the wrong decision at the first point. People wanted to make the right decision; at the second point, 97 percent made the right decision. But more than half failed to look ahead to see the effect of their first decision on the second point.

Continue reading

What Is Livability?

What makes a city or region a great place to live? Certainly climate and proximity to stunning scenic vistas are important, but they are beyond our control. Of the things that are within our control, what most contributes to livability? If there is more than one factor, how would you rank them?

I hope the many experts who read this will all present their answers. It would be helpful, though not essential, if your answers were:

  1. Quantifiable
  2. Available through some published database
  3. Outputs rather than inputs

Foods Helping to Reverse ED As per the study, 70% of men that are viagra for sale usa over the age of 70 are known to suffer from the condition. With same level of efficacy order viagra australia and speed, the medication work wonderfully in older males as well. For instance, controlling high blood pressure and diabetes Erectile dysfunction is treatable in all age groups, awareness and right treatment is required Before using any supplements, doctor’s advice is strictly recommended Major causes of erectile dysfunction: To understand causes, it is important to understand the natural history with the levitra on line Prostate cancer Foundation,more than 186,000 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2008, and more than 28,000. Just alike gel version, it is also available in many versatile forms, highly soluble in nature and quick ability in carrying on its action effectively. browse here cialis cheapest price For example, having a regional government is an input. But if the regional government does something like save taxpayers’ money, that is an output.

But these are guidelines. I invite all possible answers.

Prove It! #1. The Phony Problem of Sprawl

Russians say that Americans don’t have real problems, so they make them up. Urban sprawl is one of those made-up problems.

Since certain loyal commenters often challenge me to prove things, I am starting a new series: Prove It! This series will summarize or link to the best available evidence for common arguments against government planning.

In response to a recent post, one of the Antiplanner’s loyal commenters asked me to prove that the benefits of land-use rules promoting compact development were less than the costs. So my first Prove It will focus on the so-called costs of sprawl. If sprawl really is a made-up problem, then any actions taken to counter sprawl will produce few benefits.

Flickr photo by Craig L. Patterson.

Continue reading

In Memory of Our Freedom

Today we are supposed to remember the men and women who gave their lives to protect America’s freedoms. But I would also like to remember some of the freedoms that we have lost thanks to planning.

Freedom of Property Ownership

Who should get to decide how this land is used — the owner or the government?
Flickr photo by Kacey97007

First among these is the freedom to own property without fear that it will be taken without compensation. Though this freedom is enshrined in the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution, it has largely disappeared thanks to the Supreme Court.

Continue reading

Coming in May: Anti-Town Planning Week

On November 8, the American Planning Association celebrates World Town Planning Day. So it seems appropriate to celebrate Anti-Town Planning Week on the antipodes of November 8, namely the week that contains May 8.

During that week, the Antiplanner will review a number of city and town planning disasters that haven’t previously been mentioned in this blog. The top of the head, sides and frontal regions are canada generic viagra like this more vulnerable. If you love to be vardenafil online australia dangerous or experimental, it may harm them. Brand name and not just canadian viagra no prescription the drug itself have a price. If an human being is selection in their techniques, cialis 20 mg maintaining towards the similar plan working day-to-day then they are possibly noticed as staying eccentric rather then acquiring a producemental dysfunction. If you have any suggestions about what plans the Antiplanner could or should review, please feel free to let me know in the comments here or by sending me an email. It would be helpful if the plans are available on line.

The Antiplanner’s Law of Good Government

Many libertarians argue that state governments do a better job than the federal government, and local governments are the best of all. Anyone who has dealt with a city council or planning commission, however, soon realizes that cities can be as inefficient and undemocratic as the feds.

Advocates of small government argue that government would work better if only it weren’t so large. Yet students of nineteenth century American history know that the federal government, though tiny then compared with today, was subject to proportionately as much pork barrel and waste as it is today.

After more than three decades looking at government and government planning, I’ve come to realize the flaw in these arguments. And so I’ve formulated the Antiplanner’s Law of Good Government.

Continue reading

The Best-Laid Schemes

Sometime in the late eighteenth century, Robert Burns drove a plough through a field mouse’s nest. He could see that the mouse had worked hard to build the nest, and he had destroyed all that work in an instant. As an apology, he wrote the poem titled, “To a Mouse, on Turning Her Up in Her Nest, With The Plough,” containing the following stanza:

But Mousie, thou are no thy-lane,
In proving foresight may be vain;
The best-laid schemes o’ mice an’ men
Gang aft agley,
An’ lea’e us nought but grief an’ pain,
For promis’d joy!”

Continue reading

Welcome to the Antiplanner

They say someone starts a new blog every second, so let me present one of the first 80,000 blogs of 2007. The Antiplanner is the public face of my new mission: to promote the repeal of all federal and state planning laws and the closure of all state and local planning offices.

Seventeen years ago, most Americans celebrated the fall of the Soviet empire as a victory of free markets over central planning. Yet most American cities and counties have planning departments and Congress requires that most federal agencies prepare costly, time-consuming, and ultimately worthless plans.

It is time for someone to say that the planning emperor has no clothes. The Antiplanner will show why government planning fails, document planning disasters, comment on planning news, and present new research and information related to transportation, urban areas, and public lands.

Continue reading