Oregon has a 1 percent for art law requiring that one percent of all state construction funds be spent on art works. But that’s not enough for greedy Oregon artists, so they have proposed that Portland impose a $35 tax on every non-poverty-stricken resident over the age of 17 in the city that would be used for art. This is projected to generate $12 million a year for art.
The Antiplanner has no objection to people making art and other people buying it. I’ve purchased a variety of art pieces for my home. But what makes art so important that the government needs to tax everyone to make more?
The degree to which a man is overweight is typically measured by body mass index, which is also called Indian http://pamelaannschoolofdance.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Winterfest-Parade-Staging-Map.pdf best soft cialis. It is only a commercial generic viagra pamelaannschoolofdance.com locksmith HB that can better sexual function in men. As the woman is a passive partner, she may not be as affected as the man, but a man may not be able to appreciate and http://pamelaannschoolofdance.com/thursday-august-12th-competition-team-auditions/2-1157/ prices cialis enjoy life and co-operate with other people and contribute to the society as it is now due lack of knowledge and techniques. With the support of ingredients such as nutrients and herbs that can fight breathing disorders and proffer a cialis prescription soothing effect.
Some people might say, “It’s only $35 per person.” But, hey, I love trains and love to help restore old trains. For $12 million a year, I could fund a lot of rail restoration work. But just why should everyone else subsidize my hobby? If this measure passes, it will be just one more reason to anyone who actually works for a living to leave Portland.
