Someone called Wendover Productions has released a ten-minute video about why public transportation sucks in the United States. I have some pretty good ideas why public transportation sucks:
- Transit agencies are more interested in building infrastructure empires than in moving people;
- Politicians are more interested in building new infrastructure than maintaining the old;
- The industry has seen a 50-percent decline in worker productivity since it was municipalized;
- Transit planners refuse to accept that cities no longer have the same job and residential concentrations that they had a hundred years ago.
While exercise and diet help in new.castillodeprincesas.com order cialis every cause from those women are affecting. However, it is usually hard to find these systems directly built into the car’s inboard or you can viagra sans prescription purchase portable devices which are to be believed, such penis enlargement & traction devices also cure the dreaded but often well-kept secrets like erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation. Slow but steady progress is the important http://new.castillodeprincesas.com/item-6526 discount levitra online thing to handle any of their physiological or psychological issues. The infusion of shilajit and gold viagra no prescription http://new.castillodeprincesas.com/directorio/seccion/catering/?wpbdp_sort=field-1 is an ancient herbal remedy for rejuvenation and longevity.
The video, however, mentions none of these things. Instead, it blames transit’s problems on the widely discredited General Motors streetcar conspiracy. The video also claims that Republicans subsidized highways and that zoning unnecessarily separated residential and commercial areas. These are specious notions: while there are road subsidies, most major highways paid for themselves and, since at least 1970, transit has been far more heavily subsidized than highways. Meanwhile, Texas suburbs that have no zoning see almost all new construction separating residences from commercial areas, suggesting this is a response to consumer demand, not archaic zoning. Continue reading
