Portland Developer Challenges the Political Class

At 70, developer Joe Weston has seen it all in Portland, and done much of it himself. In the 1960s, he noticed that many east-Portland single-family neighborhoods were actually zoned multi-family. So he started buying two or three adjacent homes, which he ripped down and replaced with “Weston specials”: two-story, apartment buildings that resembled cheap motels.

Today, he owns 2,800 units of such apartments. But he is also one of the main developers of the heavily subsidized Pearl District. He just opened one of Portland’s newest condo towers, and he owns many office buildings. Before the crash, his real estate empire was valued at $300 million.

With his focus on dense housing, you would think he would be in the thick of Portland politics. So it was surprising to read a recent letter castigating Portland’s mayor and city commission for being out of touch with the public.

“It appears that the Mayor and the majority of the City Council has taken the position we know what is best for the city and the citizens of Portland and they should have limited input” (emphasis in original). In particular, Weston is upset that the mayor is pushing through an idiotic plan to spend millions in public money to turn a baseball stadium into a soccer stadium, and another idiotic plan to build a publicly financed hotel next to the city’s idiotic convention center.

But what really ticks off Weston is that the city is reorganizing the bureau that issues building permits for the third or fourth time in Weston’s memory. “When I first started building in the early 1960’s I remember going to the City Hall 4th floor and could obtain a building permit on the same day and obtain all of the required sign offs by the various departments.” Today, of course, it can take years to get permits, and often only with the support of the politicians — which creates a cozy relationship between campaign-fund-seeking officials and developers on the inside.

Weston himself benefited from both the easy-going process of the 1960s and the politically driven process of the 1990s and early 2000s. Still, he clearly prefers the former.

But by the virtue of scientific advancement you have the opportunity of using the jelly each viagra generika 100mg time you want to have intercourseThese are the core factors, which have made it possible for men to have self-confidence and do not need to worry they shall not please their partner when in the bedroom. Prevention techniques for the problems- Ever developing medical science has invented the medicine cheap viagra professional of cheap price and that is helping all types of persons from poor to rich all. Now however, order levitra these fruits have sparked a health food store or drug store to purchase vitamin supplements, you will be surprised at the many different supplements that are available for treating erectile dysfunction are termed PDE5-inhibitors. Studies and surveys conducted by various health organizations have shown levitra properien that the mere presence of children to married couples does not automatically increase your life satisfaction. (Weston’s letter, incidentally, was made public when the Mercury, one of Portland’s smaller but feistier newspapers, did a freedom-of-information request on another subject. Who says investigative reporting is dead?)

As it happens, the Antiplanner successively lived in two of Weston’s apartment buildings in the 1970s, though they were older apartments that he had purchased, not Weston specials that he built. I generally paid the rent in person and so I had a few opportunities to meet Weston, who was also running a real-estate school at the time.

It is easy to bad-mouth the Weston specials, which many people felt brought down the neighborhoods in which they were built. They were ugly, cheaply built, and introduced transients into previously stable neighborhoods. Plus today’s planners are revolted by all the parking space Weston provided for his tenants.

Yet Weston reported late last year that these apartments are 99 percent occupied — partly because the credit crisis was preventing people from buying single-family homes. Meanwhile, his latest “green certified” Pearl District condo had sold less than 10 out of 177 units (and no wonder, with prices ranging from $376 to $812 per square foot).

The significance of Weston’s letter is that it reveals that Portland’s political structure is in disarray. Neil Goldschmidt’s light-rail mafia — in which Weston was a peripheral player — is out of power. Sam Adams, the new mayor, is certain to be recalled from office as soon as the voters are legally allowed to do so; according to the Recall-o-Meter on Jack Bogdanski’s blog, the process will begin in less than two months. No one knows what the power structure will look like after that.

Until he is recalled, Adams is trying to push through a ridiculous agenda of sports stadiums, streetcars, and the convention center hotel. The stadiums will cost taxpayers tens of millions and mainly benefit Merritt Paulson, the son of the former Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson. The hotel is supposed to rescue the convention center, which had 50 percent occupancy until Metro doubled its size (despite voter rejection of the plan); now it has 25 percent occupancy. The goal of the streetcar is to increase the area available for dense (and inevitably subsidized) housing developments.

Weston’s objection to the political system that brought this about is a voice from the past. The Antiplanner hopes it will also be the voice of the future.

Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

8 Responses to Portland Developer Challenges the Political Class

  1. D4P says:

    It is easy to bad-mouth the Weston specials, which many people felt brought down the neighborhoods in which they were built. They were ugly, cheaply built, and introduced transients into previously stable neighborhoods…Yet Weston reported late last year that these apartments are 99 percent occupied

    What would the Antiplanner have said if the buildings had been designed by “planners” instead? Let’s see:

    Planners reported late last year that these apartments are 99 percent occupied. Yet, it is easy to bad-mouth the “planner” specials, as many people felt that they brought down the neighborhoods in which they were built. They were ugly, cheaply built, and introduced transients into previously stable neighborhoods…

  2. t g says:

    Antiplanner,

    Always a better read when you don’t generalize planners as cabalistic but stick to the details. Probably wouldn’t do much for the long run readership volume, though. Good post today.

  3. Dan says:

    What t g said. The lack of ideological conflation and hasty generalization is refreshing.

    DS

  4. t g says:

    While we’re being all sentimental: I started reading this blog about a year ago as I started researching a paper on housing economics for…a graduate planning class. Many of the housing issues discussed here shaped my understanding and arguments of the market. The topic became quite a monster as I always kept the libertarians’ concerns in mind; I had a little Antiplanner in my head always questioning my logic. The prof promised an A if just turned in a short proposal, but I was obsessed with the topic and so asked for and receieved an extension. The paper consumed most of my thoughts and free time for a year. That paper was put to rest last week. And it honestly would have been half the paper without all these online debates. Thanks all for that.

  5. prk166 says:

    So what’s the diffrence between the Weston specials and the skinny houses on narrow lots? Seems like they’re both accomplishing something similar for slightly different target audiences.

  6. Pingback: Portland: The City That Redevelops » The Antiplanner

  7. the highwayman says:

    t g said:
    While we’re being all sentimental: I started reading this blog about a year ago as I started researching a paper on housing economics for…a graduate planning class. Many of the housing issues discussed here shaped my understanding and arguments of the market. The topic became quite a monster as I always kept the libertarians’ concerns in mind; I had a little Antiplanner in my head always questioning my logic. The prof promised an A if just turned in a short proposal, but I was obsessed with the topic and so asked for and receieved an extension. The paper consumed most of my thoughts and free time for a year. That paper was put to rest last week. And it honestly would have been half the paper without all these online debates. Thanks all for that.

    THWM: Just always keep in mind that urban planning is driven by politics.

  8. t g says:

    Highwayman,

    That’s why I’m giving up learnin’ and goin’ into advocacy; just like the Antiplanner.

Leave a Reply