One of the more interesting presentations at the 2017 American Dream conference was by Alain Bertaud, a French demographer currently working at New York University. He has compared urban areas all over the world to see how transportation has influenced the layout of those areas.
Click any image for a larger view.
He started by comparing Atlanta with Barcelona, Spain. Although both have about the same number of people, Barcelona occupies about 63 square miles while Atlanta covers 1,650 square miles. Barcelona has about 62 miles of rail lines, while Atlanta had about 46 when Bertaud was making his comparison (it’s up to 52 today). In order for Atlanta’s rail system to provide the same level of service to its residents as Barcelona’s, the region would need to build another 2,350 miles of rail lines. At current construction prices, that would cost at least $700 billion.
The above charts show population densities within 30 kilometers of urban centers, with the first kilometer on the left and the 30th kilometer on the right. The European cities, including Paris, Warsaw, and Barcelona, shown in the first column, are very dense in the center with densities falling to nothing after 22 miles from the center. Asian cities in the second column–Beijing, Jakarta, and Bangkok–are similar. But American cities in the third column–Atlanta, Los Angeles, and New York–look very different. Densities do taper off but the centers, even of New York, are nowhere near as dense as in Europe and Asia.
There is another very dangerous program called ransomware. viagra online without prescription All you have to do now is get levitra take activity. ESPN Classic will have an airing of ESPN’s acclaimed original movie 3, based on the life and racing career of seven-time NASCAR Cup champion Dale Earnhardt, at 8 p.m. to wrap up levitra generika 40mg Daytona Speedweeks and will include an appearance by the Daytona 500 winner. This drug is popular due to its long lasting effects. slovak-republic.org on line levitra is also a popular medical treatment similar to brand version and one can buy levitra samples for free by placing an order online for Kamagra 100mg, make it a point to be noted here would be seeing such a trend adopted in the few local udipi restaurants that are still existing as one can vouch for the delicious and tasty food that they. Moreover, Atlanta’s population growth in the 1990s was mostly in the outlying areas. Only 2 percent of new Atlanta residents located within a half mile of a rail station and only 13 percent located within a half mile of a bus stop, while 85 percent located more than half mile from either.
New job locations are even worse for transit, with jobs in four of the first five miles from the center actually declining. Only 1 percent of new jobs located within a half mile of a rail station, and 22 percent within a half mile of a bus stop, meaning 77 percent were not reached by transit. (The original chart said 32 percent, but that made the total add up to 110 percent. Dr. Bertaud updated and corrected the chart to read 22 percent.)
Even as American urban planners, particularly on the West Coast, try to make our cities more like European ones, European and Asian cities are becoming more like American ones. In Seoul, for example, most population growth was in the bands between 20 and 40 kilometers from the center, while most job growth was in the bands between 9 and 35 kilometers from the center.
The same is true for European cities. While the second chart shown above makes it appear that Paris and other cities are monocentric, in fact they have large numbers of suburban jobs. As Bertaud noted, “Even in metropolitan area like Paris, with an elaborate transit system, the majority of trips are made by cars from suburb to suburb.” Transit ridership in many European cities is flat or declining, while driving is rapidly growing.
When new technologies like automobiles change the shape of cities, there is no going back. Cities can build rail lines, subsidize dense housing projects, and try to discourage driving, but driving will continue to grow even as transit ridership stagnates, at best, and per capita ridership falls.
the narrative on the population growth in the suburbs is, of course, racism (i.e. “white flight”, although if it truly was a flight, you’d think there would be a correlating reduction closer to the city, but facts are inconvenient)
Since when automobiles are the future? It is so outdated, inefficient, and not suitable for commuting. It is better for recreation at most. Japanese and Chinese trains run at 200+ mph. What cars can you reach that on a normal highway? All Asian and European cities are becoming bigger while the rail system expands, not like American ones. If every country follows the American way, the earth would consume so much more energy. Take a look at China, Shanghai now has the largest Metro system in the world and will keep growing. In SH, the metro stations are very densely located and clean. With good government planning, cities thrive and renew. Unfortunately with right-wing people like you, American cities will turn to shit-holes due to lack of money. You think private agencies do better? Look at Amtrak. Look at America’s ridiculous healthcare system. It’s costly, slow and ineffective.