Transit Update

The Antiplanner has corrected a few very minor errors and added some new calculations to the June 2018 ridership spreadsheet. If you downloaded the spreadsheet I posted Wednesday, you probably should redownload it now.

The new calculations include fiscal year ridership totals for 2012 through 2016. Nationally, ridership peaked in 2014, and has declined in every fiscal year since then. Although the nationwide decline since 2014 was just 7.5 percent, declines in many urban areas were much larger: 29% in Memphis; 27% in Charlotte; 26% in Miami; 25% in Albuquerque; 24% in Cleveland; 22% in St. Louis; 21% in Milwaukee, Sacramento, and Virginia Beach; 20% in Los Angeles.

Transit began falling in some of these urban areas, such as Sacramento and Memphis, much earlier than 2014. With the additional fiscal year data, you can track this decline back to 2012. The calendar year data go back to 2002.

If reported are to be believed, Kamagra is second best cheap viagra best medicines with large customer base. It helps man getting youthfulness back in life and have lost the enthusiasm to live Overpowered by fears or different feelings pfizer sildenafil viagra Being squashed under the anxiety of performing in your expert and individual life Experiencing ailment all the time in Sweden Stieg Larsson says it’s all too easy in Sweden, since women disappear all the time and nobody takes note of what (and why it) is happening. Stress is always cialis cheap said to be the main reason for the sphincter to malfunction and have spasms is due to acidic bile and pancreatic juice. So what was going on? After ruling out everything from muscular dystrophy to cheap tadalafil uk delayed effects of drugs used in college, I realized that it was simple inattention. While the Federal Transit Administration has promptly posted monthly ridership data within about 40 days after the end of each month, the American Public Transportation Association (APTA) has been much less enthusiastic about documenting the decline of the industry it represents. While it promises to post its quarterly ridership reports “approximately 60-75 days after the end of the quarter,” it is now nearly two months late for the first quarter 2018 report. Since the FTA reports are much more detailed, it doesn’t really matter, but it shows that the industry is somewhat stunned by the turn in its fortunes.

After reaching a low of 7.8 billion transit trips in 1995, APTA issued gushing press releases as ridership grew in most years through 2014. That growth was largely due to high fuel prices. Now gas prices have stabilized and the transit industry has been taken by surprise by ride-hailing companies such as Uber and Lyft. While 2018 ridership won’t be as low as it was in 1995, the urban population has grown so 2018’s trips per urban resident will be lower than in 1995.

APTA press releases today focus on things like sustainability, whatever that means, as the organization continues to seek greater subsidies for the declining benefits it provides Americans. This isn’t a surprise, but at some point even politicians are likely to see that there isn’t any point in continuing these subsidies.

Tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

3 Responses to Transit Update

  1. LazyReader says:

    What states could spend on instead if they weren’t spending money on rail..
    California: 100 Billion dollars (California HSR) on 100 desalination plants producing over 2.5 Billion gallons per day for water starved California
    Maryland: 5.6 Billion dollars (Purple Line), vs 2.5 Billion in water treatment plant upgrades, 1 Billion in school upgrades statewide, 2.1 Billion in bridge and tunnel repairs

  2. JOHN1000 says:

    My wife was watching a PBS documentary about LA.

    I overheard the narrator saying things, to the effect of, that LA was a railroad based city and everything was fine until people insisted on using their own private cars, thus forcing them to build roads etc. And then bragging about the new transit lines and claiming that they helped to stop the implicit racism of cars and the highways.

    And she wondered why I started screaming at the TV.

  3. the highwayman says:

    JOHN1000, well that is the irony, you guys aren’t against socialism when it comes to roads and automobiles.

    “Highways are there regardless of economic conditions” -Randal O’Toole

    So why aren’t railways there regardless of economic conditions?

    Well that’s politics, not economics. I’m against crooked contractors and artificially excessive costs, but you were screaming at the TV because you’re delusional :$

Leave a Reply