The Federal Highway Administration has begun posting Highway Statistics for 2017. Only about a quarter of the files are posted so far, including data on miles of highways, miles of driving, and highway safety. Data on finances, motor vehicles, and fuel consumption remain to be posted.
Time-series data on miles of driving and roads show that, after taking a dip after the 2008 recession, miles of driving have returned to their previous upward trajectory, growing at close to 2 percent per year, while the number of miles of roads to drive on are growing much slower, less than half a percent per year. This helps explain why congestion continues to get worse, though based on traffic densities congestion was worse in the mid-2000s than it was in 2017.
However, for ageist men taking the low strength of its generic cialis canada dose would be highly suitable for them. In some patients the side effects of these drugs may conflict with other drugs https://www.unica-web.com/archive/2013/competition/franticjury.html order cheap viagra and do more harm to the user. Surgeons can use brachytherapy to sildenafil pfizer deliver a greater dose of radiation than stereotactic radiotherapy. Exercising, on cheap viagra order the other hand, releases natural hormones that increase one’s endorphin levels, thereby making the effect long period. The safety data indicate that fatalities declined slightly in 2017, and the fatality rate fell to 11.5 per billion vehicle miles. That’s higher than the 10.7 recorded in 2014 but much lower than the 48.5 fatalities per billion vehicle miles in 1970. Rural roads are more dangerous that urban roads, averaging 18 vs. 8 fatalities per billion vehicle miles.
A couple of decades ago, the Department of Transportation published annual highway data before it published transit data. Now, transit data get published first, and many of the tables of 2016 highway statistics and a few from 2015 are still not yet published. This may reflect differences in budgets, but it is frustrating to those of us who are interested in transportation trends.
Rural roads are more dangerous than urban roads………..my ass
Try crossing an urban road; you’re a cockroach
There are more urban roads than rural roads. My opinoins aside the data seems to show.
According to the 2013 American Community Survey from the U.S. Census Bureau, an estimated 19 percent of the U.S. population lived in rural areas. However, rural fatalities accounted for 54 percent of all traffic fatalities in 2013. Why so many deaths in such sparsely populated areas? The number one reason, Alcohol and not wearing a seatbelt, something that’s less likely in camera enforced urban areas.
Speed of the vehicle, not the drug.
I don’t think there are large differences in seat belt compliance or drunk driving rates between urban and rural areas. The differences in fatal crash rates between urban and rural areas are usually some combination of a larger number of run-off-road crashes (this in turn is a function of design features such as more two-lane, head-to-head traffic and fewer paved shoulders), more interaction with wildlife, and longer response times for emergency services in more remote locations.
In any event, it’s good to see fatalities back on the decline.