Amtrak Cancels Chicago

Amtrak, which often claims to offer all-weather transportation, preemptively cancelled all trains to and from Chicago yesterday due to cold temperatures and, as one news report says, “an abundance of caution.” Before Amtrak, private passenger trains would sometimes get stuck in deep snow or be rerouted due to floods.

However, I don’t recall hearing about the railroads cancelling passenger trains on account of cold weather. I myself once took a winter train from Winnipeg to Churchill, Manitoba. The mercury read minus 20 when we left Winnipeg and it was colder than that in Churchill. In fact, I doubt the temperatures ever got above minus 15 during the entire round trip. I regretted taking the trip as it was hard to see much of Churchill when risking frostbite just by going outside — I recall spending most of my time in a library. But the trains were on time despite the cold weather.

There is nothing to feel shy about going generic cialis from canada to get you tested. Sometimes we see that we take enough pharma-bi.com online viagra store food according to our need it is turned into the glucose by your liver and muscles. pharma-bi.com discount viagra Men’s cleaning tips – just like women, men too requiresvarious types of techniques to clean their face and body. Pooping while sitting is not the natural act and prescription de levitra we are not designed to do so. Perhaps Amtrak knows that its aging equipment is so poorly maintained that it can’t handle cold temperatures. Perhaps Amtrak thinks no one is going to try to ride trains in this weather anyway. Or perhaps Amtrak just doesn’t care about its passengers and is using this as a good excuse to save a few bucks. In any case, cold weather isn’t a satisfactory reason to cancel nearly all its trains in the Midwest.

This isn’t the first time Amtrak has preemptively cancelled trains because of its fears about the weather. The all-weather claim is overblown, and should no longer be used as a justification for Amtrak’s subsidies.

Tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

9 Responses to Amtrak Cancels Chicago

  1. Henry Porter says:

    “The all-weather claim is overblown, and should no longer be used as a justification for Amtrak’s subsidies.”

    There is NO justification for Amtrak’s subsidies.

    The reason Amtrak can cancel trains for questionable reasons without a passenger uprising is the same as the reason why they can offer special deals and discounts. It’s because Amtrak is more of a tourist train than a transportation train.

    Who decides to ride a train when they have a “second passenger rides for free” deal? A tourist. Or two passengers who would have been on the train anyway. It’s hard to fathom a significant number of non-passengers who are going somewhere for a purpose being swayed onto a slow train because the ticket price is less for a short time but still higher than all the alternatives.

    Lowering Amtrak ticket prices is a gift to existing passengers at the expense of taxpayers who make up the additional losses.

  2. prk166 says:

    The old equipment may play a part in it. The train to Churchill was probably ontime because they had already padded the schedule for winter conditions. I’d speculate that a look at any operational map on a Class 1 this morning is going to show a bunch of extra speed restrictions and delayed and canceled freight trains.

    You just can’t get around the physics, the metallurgy and such of all the pieces involved. When it gets bitter cold, things don’t run right and things break.

    And maybe that’s Amtrak’s concern, that they know things will break. And being saddled by Congress with having a giant, sparse system, they know they won’t have anything around to address the problem. A train that isn’t generating heat out in North Dakota with windchills -77F quickly goes from an inconvenience to flat out deadly.

  3. CapitalistRoader says:

    A woman got her foot chopped off in this fiasco which was initially blamed on the seven inches of champagne powder snow. There were no weather-related school closings this day so the weather wasn’t unusual for January. And the equipment can’t be more than a few years old.

    Passenger ejected, seriously hurt when RTD light rail train derails in Aurora

    Eyewitness: ‘This isn’t going to be pretty.’

    Kurt Sevits , Russell Haythorn | The Denver Channel | Jan 28, 2019

    DENVER — A person was taken to the hospital with serious injuries after being thrown from an RTD light rail train that derailed in Aurora Monday morning.

    The R Line train derailed at the intersection of South Sable Boulevard and East Exposition Avenue at about 7:15 a.m., according to Aurora police. The train had been going south on Sable and turning onto Exposition when it came off the tracks.

    A passenger was ejected from the train and suffered a “serious bodily injury,” police said.

    Officers didn’t provide any further details on the nature of the injury, but video from a witness at the scene showed someone being treated for injuries to a foot.

    “Her foot was absolutely amputed off her leg,” said Terry Edick, a passenger on the train when it derailed. “It was completely cut off.”

    Edick said he rides the train every day, and it was going way too fast.

    “The driver never slowed the train down at all,” Edick said. “This was a 90-degree turn and we’re going away too fast to do a 90-degree turn in a train. I looked up and I realized we were going too fast and I saw the stoplight on Exposition and I’m like, ‘This isn’t going to be pretty.’”

    Edick was thrown from his seat.

    Witnesses said the woman who was ejected was thrown out of her seat and up against the door. The hinges on the door then popped open, she fell out and one foot was caught underneath the train.

    RTD said it’s too early to tell what went wrong.

    “It’s really hard to speculate at this point,” said Tina Jaquez, spokeswoman for RTD. “We really have to do a thorough investigation. This is obviously a very tragic incident and we feel terrible. Safety is our number one priority.”

    The woman ejected was stable at last check, according to police.

    Other passengers were taken to the hospital with minor injuries, police said.

    It wasn’t immediately clear if the derailment was caused by Monday’s snowfall. Police said weather and speed were both being investigated as possible factors.

    The intersection was closed for several hours and train service was disrupted while police investigated and crews worked to get the train back on the tracks.

  4. JOHN1000 says:

    Amtrak’s actions show that Amtrak is not essential. Otherwise it would be running- more carefully than normal (but then careful operations should be the norm in any event)

    What about all the people who bought tickets and are missing important business matters etc.? They will have to use “unessential” and un-subsidized carriers to get places.

  5. metrosucks says:

    Regardless of what highwayman/msetty might say, fart, or do, Amtrak has NEVER been essential, except for the doling out of congressional pork.

  6. MJ says:

    @CapitalistRoader

    Coincidentally enough, the Wikipedia page on Denver RTD’s “R” line appears to feature a photo of the exact intersection (and curve) where the derailment occurred.

  7. the highwayman says:

    Metrosucks, if you deliberately break something, why then complain that it doesn’t work? :$

  8. the highwayman says:

    Even roads need to have snow plowed for automobiles to get around, but you’re not against “socialism” there :$

  9. CapitalistRoader says:

    Great excuse, H-Man. The next time I take a 30mph curve at 60mph in my car, I’ll just blame the resulting collision on the road not being plowed to my satisfaction. And if someone else gets their foot chopped off as a result, well, they’ve got another foot so what’s the problem?

Leave a Reply