Another Reason to Drive a Car

Not only is a private automobile the safest place to travel during a pandemic, it’s the safest place to be tested for the coronavirus. At least, so laments Eve Andrews, a writer for Grist who can easily afford a car but has been trying to live without one.

She notes that some people don’t have cars because “cars can be prohibitively expensive to purchase and maintain.” I don’t find that persuasive as owning a car is one of the best ways to boost one’s income. I am pretty sure that most of the 9 percent of households in American who don’t own cars can afford to do so, they just choose not to and then often rely other taxpayers to subsidize their transit rides.
Persons who are showing the indications of menopause or andropause start pfizer viagra sales to show. Kamagra jelly 100 mg not only canadian viagra store increases stamina, energy and endurance, thus contributing to a better sexual life. Infertility is becoming an usual problem in today’s free samples of cialis life. If 50mg viagra sale you are facing Erectile Dysfunction under the various brand names.
In any case, as Andrews notes, social distancing is causing at least some people to question the car-free lifestyle. Unfortunately, anti-car people have so demonized cars that people think they are being virtuous just by not owning one when in fact they maybe harming both themselves and others by making themselves more vulnerable to catching and spreading the virus.

Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

3 Responses to Another Reason to Drive a Car

  1. LazyReader says:

    Transit is in decline because conventional rail transit is Monolithic an linear. People are not. Ten thousand people with a thousand different destinations cannot be satiated no matter how much you spend. If the train doesn’t take you there conveniently, you’re gonna take the bus, if the bus doesn’t you’re gonna drive. I said this in a prior post, built to a specific size, specific scale, specific timeframe. What we learned about the A380, bigger isn’t always better.

    The Anti-car lifestyle, is just that, a non-compulsory lifestyle. They occupy a dedicated branch of people whose ideological bias against cars, namely environment, anti-big business, hatred of quid pro quo businesses like car service, dealerships and insurance.
    And let us not forget the hardcore bicycle-fanatics.

  2. prk166 says:


    I had liberated myself from hundreds of pounds of metal, thousands of dollars in annual repair bills from the mechanic who was surely ripping me off, and any combustion engine-related climate guilt!
    ” ~ Eve Andrews

    Whatever happened to journalism? Here’s someone who _claims_ to be sure they were being ripped off. Wouldn’t it make for a wonderful story to investigate and demonstrate fraud? Think of all the people that would be helped.

    Or maybe her memory or understanding of those repair bills is about as accurate as the mere hundreds of pounds of steel that she seems to think were in here car.

    Note: Even a modern car you’re likely looking at least a 1,000 pounds of just steel in that vehicle.

  3. MJ says:

    She notes that some people have no cars because they “cars can be prohibitively expensive to purchase and maintain.”

    I’m sure those same people are paying half or more of their income in housing costs. Make of that what you will.

    Also, would her “climate guilt” still plague her if she switched to an electric vehicle?

Leave a Reply