The Future of Driving

A new study from accounting firm KPMG predicts that auto travel in the United States will be 9 to 10 percent less after the pandemic than it was before. Telecommuting, says the report, will lead to a 10 to 20 percent reduction in commuting by car while on-line shopping will lead to a 10 to 30 percent reduction in shopping trips.

This is good news to the transit-loving, auto-hating folks at Streetsblog, who celebrate “14 million cars off the road forever” but warn that “if we don’t act fast, they’ll come back” (which makes “forever” somewhat dubious). The “actions” they advocate call for giving the transit industry another $32 billion right away so it can keep its empty transit vehicles clean and even more money after that so it can increase the frequencies of those empty buses and trains.

If you believe the KPMG report, however, that’s not going to work. The report also found that 43 percent of former transit riders don’t plan to go back to riding transit after the pandemic, and most of them will substitute autos for transit. If true, that will increase driving by about 5 billion vehicle miles. KPMG admitted that transit’s loss would somewhat offset the decrease in auto travel, but did not include that in its calculations.

Indeed, KPMG’s overly simplistic study failed to account for many possible interactions in the transportation sector. It asked transit users if they planned to switch to single-occupancy vehicles, carpools, or ride hailing, but didn’t ask how many expected to end up telecommuting. It asked how many cars would be taken off the road because of telecommuting, but it didn’t ask how many more would be added to the road as people take advantage of lower congestion.

Randall Crane, an urban planner now at UCLA (but formerly at UC Irvine), once did a study of telecommuting that found that people who work at home don’t necessarily drive less than people who commute by car — they just drive at other times of the day, since working at home gives them flexibility to set their own hours. On-line shopping may reduce driving for shopping, but what if people take the extra time they save from not shopping and use it to travel for recreation or social reasons? KPMG is silent about such questions.

The headline-grabbing numbers in the KPMG report are the maximums of its estimates. “We estimate that total U.S. VMT could drop by 140 billion to 270 billion miles per year,” says the report, which is 5 to 9 percent, not 9 to 10 percent. That drop in driving, the report continues, could reduce auto ownership “from 1.97 to as little as 1.87 vehicles per household” which is 7 to 14 million vehicles.

Yet driving has proven to be far more resilient than transit ridership. According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis (click on table 2.2.5), Americans have consistently spent about 9 percent of their personal incomes on driving for the last 70 years. As the cost of driving has declined relative to personal incomes, people drive more.
Muscle pain my pharmacy cialis soft tab often develops as they contract to prevent further damage, as they protect the primary underlying structures. Problems:- the term “disease mongering” is now commonly used as shorthand to describe campaigns that inappropriately widen the boundaries of treatable illness, there is uncertainty about how to operationally define the concept.With most disorders or conditions, there will be a number of issues which is associated with psychological disorders such as trouble in relationship, eating disorders, depression, social anxieties, sexual addictions, erectile dysfunction or addition to drugs. online cialis no prescription But still the debating point of this therapy lies in the best viagra pills acceptance of this therapy by medical practitioners as the trial has been done only on 29 males and it cannot be concluded that the Neogra oral jelly is appreciated by all due to the insufficiency of body stamina. If you keep on going to have so many medicines at a time then it might give viagra generic for sale find out over here rise to erectile dysfunction.
Most of that increase in driving hasn’t been commuting and shopping, which represent less than half the driving Americans do. If future Americans don’t have to spend so much time shopping or commuting to work, they will spend more time driving for family, social, and recreational activities.

Nor do auto makers need to worry much that the American auto fleet is going to shrink by 14 million vehicles. According to Global Workplace Analytics, most post-COVID telecommuters will work at home only part time, continuing to go to another workplace one or more days a week. They’ll still need cars for that.

In addition, experience indicates that, when gas prices fall, people use the savings to buy bigger, more luxurious automobiles. This suggests any households that decide to have one less car because one of the income-earners is working at home will, the next time they buy a car, use the savings to buy one that is more luxurious than they previously owned. Auto companies probably earn more profits from the sale of one luxury car than two commuter cars.

Transit, on the other hand, is far less resilient than driving. Citing Streetlight Data, the KPMG report says that driving fell by 64 percent in April, 2020. According to the Federal Highway Administration, it was only 42 percent compared with the previous April. Since gasoline consumption was down only 37 percent, the FHwA number sounds closer to reality. Transit ridership, meanwhile, fell by 84 percent.

What the KPMG report doesn’t say is that May driving was only 25 percent less than the May before, meaning that it had recovered 40 percent of its loss. May transit ridership was still down by 81 percent, so it recovered only 4 percent of its loss. We should have June numbers next week, but I expect that driving will again recover more of its decline than transit.

What this means is that anyone who proposes or makes transportation policy based on a projected 9 to 10 percent decline in driving and 14 million fewer vehicles is going to be disappointed. The good news is that there is likely to be less rush-hour driving on congested roads. The even better news for the economy, if not for auto-haters, is that overall driving is likely to recover to pretty close to what it was before the pandemic and will continue to grow after that.

Tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

6 Responses to The Future of Driving

  1. rovingbroker says:

    The new jobs I see (and old jobs moved from old inner-city and big-city locations) are going into new buildings surrounded by paved parking, built in greenfields (former ag land) near large free-standing retail (WalMart, Target, Home Depot), free-standing dining and free standing entertainment (Main Event).
    .
    Money is going into places that can’t be easily served by transit. And it’s moving from places that were once served by transit.
    .
    I was surprised to learn, several years ago, that rural small towns once had streetcars and buses. Surprised because all traces of them had been erased just like the horses and buggies before them.

    https://ohiomemory.org/digital/collection/p15005coll27/id/22361

  2. fazalmajid says:

    Since in most cities traffic congestion is at the maximum people will tolerate, people who were hitherto not driving due to traffic jams will pour back and we will back where we started.

  3. rovingbroker,

    In the United States, around the turn of the 20th century, every town of 5,000 people or more had a streetcar line. In Ohio, as of 1908, every town of 10,000 or more was served by an interurban electric rail line.

    • rovingbroker says:

      I knew about the interurbans but even though I’ve spent a lot of time in small towns, I’d not heard of any kind of historic public transportation until just recently. It’s like streetcars were never there. There are some remnants of the interurbans such as bridges and roadbeds.

  4. LogiRush says:

    Here’s the latest data from Dallas-Fort Worth, see item 8
    https://www.nctcog.org/nctcg/media/Transportation/Committees/RTC/2020/agenda-packet-aug.pdf?ext=.pdf

    Data is decrease in 2020 compared to same month in 2019
    Transit
    Jan -1.9%
    Feb -2.9%
    March -26.8%
    April -59.3%
    May -55.1%
    June -53.6%

    Roadway traffic
    March -10.9%
    April -25.3%
    May -16.0%
    June -6.2%

    As the data shows, road traffic is nearly back to normal while transit is only slightly up from the lowest point in April, and still down 53.6% compared to last year.

  5. rovingbroker says:

    Today’s Wall Street Journal reports that REI is selling their brand new world headquarters before moving in.
    .
    o REI Built an Iconic HQ. Because of Covid-19, the Outdoor Retailer Wants to Sell It
    .
    o Surprised by how productive remote work has been, companies are reconsidering the need for central offices
    .
    “Instead of a single headquarters, REI will open a number of smaller offices and allow employees to work remotely, the company said. Employees have been working from home since March.”
    .
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/rei-built-an-iconic-hq-because-of-covid-19-the-outdoor-retailer-wants-to-sell-it-11597263188?

    .
    And I’m sure that those “smaller offices” will be a relatively short commute from home.

Leave a Reply