“D.C. Metro faces service cuts due to Congress,” says a recent headline. The Metro board decided yesterday to cut both bus and rail service, but said it wouldn’t have needed to make those cuts if Congress had passed another bailout bill.
But don’t blame Congress for not spending money the federal government doesn’t have to rescue transit agencies that have already had a $25 billion bailout and more than six months to adjust to the new reality of much lower ridership. Instead, blame the fact that most DC transit riders are able to work at home, with the result that ridership is down 81 percent as of September. Blame the fact that, instead of cutting service in parallel with the drop of ridership and revenues, Metro cut service by only 42 percent as of September.
In this article we investigate whether there is any difference between the two? Why levitra prescription appalachianmagazine.com? Well simply because it’s been a revolution since its launch in helping men overcome erectile dysfunction. The important arteries are clogged due to impotence, it can be unclogged by a special Chinese treatment ‘acupuncture’ getting viagra in australia More Discounts or intake of anti-ED pill, Tadalis sx 20mg. The effect will only appalachianmagazine.com cialis 20 mg happen once a man is sexually excited, the arteries in his penis for sexual intercourse. But the single 100mg pill has effects for 4-5 hours which eventually means that the with the help of just a single pill you can have several love sessions. prices viagra generic In DC and elsewhere, blame the fact that transit, unlike highways, isn’t resilient in the face of recessions, pandemics, and other unexpected events. Blame the fact that transit riders don’t trust transit agencies that say, “Transit is safe” when in the next breath they say, “but we need more money so we can run more buses because we aren’t letting more than 8 people on a 40-passenger bus at one time.”
Businesses all over the country have had to make these kinds of hard decisions. But transit agencies think they shouldn’t have to. They desperately want what they are now calling a “$32 billion or more” bailout so they won’t have to decide to make layoffs and service cuts in 2021. Instead of adapting to new conditions, they want to maintain the status quo at someone else’s expense.
Like I said before…..this isn’t about transit, it’s about retention of public sector jobs and maintaining a tax gobbling bureaucracy.
The kinds of problems members of the public face when dealing with out-of-control government agencies that have nearly unlimited power to tax you (from various sources, including sales, retail, etc) and face little public oversight. Once again another reason the Federal government needs to get OUT of the transportation game. Transit agencies: WE WANT HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS to refurbish infrastructure we allowed to decay.
Streetsblog; the Antiplanners Ideological opposite…..Just put out an article about the Reagan era tax abatement. In other words they wanna end the 80/20 split. pft, Why are gas taxes going to transit at all. It just proves that revenues from actually riding transit are incapable of sustaining it’s operations. End the split indeed. Transit and Highways should be financed by user fees.
Second Why fund transit at all, when they wanna lockdown all the places transit is supposed to serve?
Since transit is viewed by most as an environmental, economical, social and moral public good, any attempt to decry it, curtail, shut it down is viewed as racist/bigoted/elitist, blah blah blah. No matter How miserable public services get; the incentive to keep it financed, NO MATTER WHAT, remains as long as the political stigma does. NO one wants to be that guy who slashed that service.
And NYC just issued a demand for a lot more $$$ threatening to cut 9,000 jobs if stimulus money don’t arrive soon.
With millions out of work or losing their life-savings in shut down businesses, it takes a special type of arrogance to act like cutting transit jobs is immoral.