Will COVID Kill Robotaxis?

One of the victims of COVID-19 may be robotaxis and with them one path towards a future of autonomous vehicles. Before the pandemic, there were two views of how driverless cars would take over the road.

One model, which I’ll call the Waymo model but it was also endorsed by Uber, General Motors (through its Cruise subsidiary), and Ford, was that robotaxis would replace privately owned automobiles, especially in the urban areas that house 80 percent of the nation’s population. These robotaxis would rely heavily on maps, and would only work in areas that had been mapped. Since many people would be unwilling to buy a car that could only go on some roads, Waymo and other software companies planned to put them in robotaxi or ride-hailing services, at least until the entire country was mapped.

The other model, which I’ll call the Tesla model but it was also endorsed by Volvo and perhaps Volkswagen, continued to rely on private ownership of automobiles. Instead of depending on precise maps, the autonomous vehicles would rely mainly on their own sensors, which would enable them to go anywhere, even potentially off-road. To get to that point, Tesla and other companies planned to incrementally improve the on-board electronics until the computers could completely take over driving.

Before the pandemic, most of the buzz I heard in the high-tech sector was that the robotaxi model would prevail. One study even predicted that, by 2030, 95 percent of all travel would be by shared rather than privately owned vehicles. Many driverless car experts were scornful of Tesla, saying that its autopilot mode wasn’t as safe as it needed to be.

I strongly suspect that a lot of the preference towards robotaxis was wishful thinking. Decades of anti-auto propaganda has stimulated a lot of knee-jerk animosity towards private vehicles. Somehow, use of shared vehicles was considered more virtuous than ownership of a vehicle that would remain motionless for 90 percent of its life. Some people claimed that shared vehicles would cost far less than private vehicles, but considering that the average cost of owning a car in the United States is about 40 cents a mile while the marginal cost of driving a car you already own is only about 15 cents a mile, I doubt that owners of shared vehicle fleets could get their average costs down to the marginal costs of vehicle owners.
In general, three levitra samples free impotency levels have been associated with virility, strength and weight management. For this you must visit a good doctor as and levitra on line when any such problem arises never forget to take appropriate suggestions from the doctor. viagra side online Likewise, there are distinctive sorts of illnesses that influence the general population and trouble them a great opportunity to be treated for a serious issue like erectile dysfunction include psychotherapy, adopting a healthy lifestyle, oral PDE5 inhibitors (including Sildenafil Citrate, Vardenafil, Tadalafil, and Avanafil), intracavernosal injections (including Caverject, Edex, Bimix and Trimix), using vacuum devices, surgery in extreme cases, and alteration in medications. Our service elevates safety, punctuality, and relaxation. cialis prescription canada
In any case, one result of the pandemic is that talk of robotaxis has at least temporarily receded. Use of shared vehicles, whether airlines, public transit, or Uber, is down by 60 to 70 percent. Use of private vehicles remains at 90 percent of pre-pandemic levels. Companies that were focused on driverless ride-hailing are now talking about driverless delivery vehicles for on-line shoppers instead.

Of course, the uncertainty is how people’s attitudes towards ride hailing will change after most people are vaccinated. I strongly suspect that many people will remain reluctant to use shared vehicles even as memories of COVID-19 fade away. This is likely to cut deeply into the market for the future ride-hailing business, with or without human drivers.

At the same time, this gives a boost to the Tesla model of incremental improvements of privately owned vehicles. Tesla in particular promises to upgrade the software of the vehicles it sells as it improves that software, and Ford and other companies have followed suit. This means that a car you buy today can become completely driverless in a few years provided it has the right on-board sensors.

While Elon Musk has paid lip service to the idea of robotaxis, he seems more interested in selling Tesla’s autopilot software to robotaxi companies than in running a ride-hailing service himself. I am sure there will be robotaxis in the future, but I don’t think they will be as important as many people thought and they may not even be a critical step on the path to fully autonomous vehicles.

Tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

7 Responses to Will COVID Kill Robotaxis?

  1. prk166 says:

    Arguing that robotaxis would replace car ownership is arguing that hotels will replace home ownership.

  2. Frank says:

    “Arguing that robotaxis would replace car ownership is arguing that hotels will replace home ownership.”
    .
    Not sure if prk166 is retarded or disingenuous.
    .
    Comparing hotels to home ownership is a false equivalence, and the logical comparison someone who is not retarded would make would be to compare home ownership to leasing a home. It should be obvious that hotels are very short term (a few days at most) as are car rentals. Guess this is not obvious not to prk166.
    .
    Certainly some might choose a car subscription or lease model over car ownership just as many choose to lease a place to live rather than to own a home.
    .
    Not surprised to see the mentally deficient prk166 making such spurious claims.

  3. prk166 says:

    Frank, a taxi ride is a one-off. Your commitment to the robotaxi is a one-time transaction.

    Leasing a house would be comprobable to leasing a car, not using a robotaxi.

    If it feels retrded to you to make the comparison, it speaks to how dubious the claim has been that people would massively shift their behaviors. People rarely do that. And the crux of their reasoning has been “cuz it’ll be cheaper”. But if people wanted cheaper, they’d all be driving Toyota Yaris’ instead of Rav4s.

  4. prk166 says:

    Frank, a taxi ride is a one-off. Your commitment to the robotaxi is a one-time transaction.

    Leasing a house would be comprobable to leasing a car, not using a robotaxi.

    If it feels retrded to you to make the comparison, it speaks to how dubious the claim has been that people would massively shift their behaviors. People rarely do that. And the crux of their reasoning has been “cuz it’ll be cheaper”. But if people wanted cheaper, they’d all be driving Toyota Yaris’ instead of Rav4s.Frank, a taxi ride is a one-off. Your commitment to the robotaxi is a one-time transaction.

    Leasing a house would be comprobable to leasing a car, not using a robotaxi.

    If it feels retrded to you to make the comparison, it speaks to how dubious the claim has been that people would massively shift their behaviors. People rarely do that. And the crux of their reasoning has been “cuz it’ll be cheaper”. But if people wanted cheaper, they’d all be driving Toyota Yaris’ instead of Rav4s.

    now

  5. prk166 says:

    Frank, just to be clear since you’ve got a stick up your rear that’s distracting you from thinking things through + being extra grumpy —> A taxi ride is a one-off. Robo-taxis, like a hotel, are a one-off commitment. They’re nothing like a long term lease. The question at hand is if __robotaxis__ would replace car ownership , not leasing.

  6. prk166 says:

    As for car subscription model for self driving cars, the car subscription model exists today for non-robocars. If people aren’t embracing it today, there’s no reason why they’ll embrace it tomorrow.

Leave a Reply