Rail advocates like to claim that the introduction of high-speed trains has led to a cessation of airline service, apparently to show that high-speed trains can compete against faster planes. While this may have happened on a few routes, European air travel before the pandemic was growing far faster than rail travel. For example, in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain — the main European countries with high-speed rail — rail travel between 2011 and 2019 grew by 14 percent while air travel grew by 34 percent. No European country saw rail travel grow faster than air travel.
The government of France has found a solution to for-profit airlines outcompeting government-subsidized trains: ban the competing air travel. Under a law passed earlier this month, airlines will not be allowed to operate on routes that trains can serve in less than two-and-a-half hours. If high-speed trains were able to compete on their own, they wouldn’t need such a law.
Of course, French politicians justified this law based on the supposed savings in carbon emissions. But conventional trains are only a little more energy efficient than planes, and high-speed trains require well over 50 percent more energy, per train-car-mile, than conventional trains. Passenger occupancies also tend to be much higher on planes than trains — typically 85 percent vs. 50 percent — because planes usually operate in non-stop service while trains make many stops, so the size of planes can be set to demand while trains must be sized to fit the portion of the journey where demand is highest.
You are advised to consume healthy diet and practice exercises regularly. cialis de prescription Once hit by performance anxiety, getting instant action may respitecaresa.org viagra 20mg be quite hard. If you google the symptoms of chronic discount cialis http://respitecaresa.org/event/winter-break-camp-ages-6-17/ prostatitis, you need to find an excellent clinician. How Kamagra works? It softens the veins running through penis and improves blood flow so that the cyclic GMP can work adequately.The compound broadens the vessels around the penis, buy viagra in india check for info which increases the blood circulation in the muscles and it gets relaxed and erected. France gets most of its electricity from nuclear power, so electric-powered transportation won’t emit much greenhouse gases. However, constructing high-speed rail lines can produce tens of thousands of tons of greenhouse gases per mile, while planes require very little infrastructure. The net result is that it isn’t clear whether high-speed trains are cleaner than flying.
Ironically, the same bill that limited short-haul flights gave Air France-KLM (which is 18 percent owned by the government) €4 billion to help it cope with the pandemic. Air France mainly though not exclusively does long-haul flights, and even before the pandemic it had decided to reduce its short-haul flights.
Meanwhile, the airlines that do short-haul flights that will be most affected by France’s pro-train law are low-cost carriers such as Ryanair and easyJet. These airlines — most of which are not French-owned — also compete against Air France on some long-haul routes. So the new law simultaneously reduces competition for France’s government-owned high-speed trains as well as hurts competition to the partly government-owned flag carrier. Somehow I don’t think this is really about greenhouse gases.
Hi,
I’m sorry that comments haven’t been working. I think I’ve fixed the problems so you should be able to comment now.
The Antiplanner
Its funny that some of the busiest air routes are on pairs with high speed rail. Tokyo-Osaka is still one of the busiest air routes on earth.
No prob on the comments. I figured y’ld notice the lack of them sooner than later.
As for the France thing, I wouldn’t make anything out of it. It does NOT affect RyanAir nor EasyJet nor any other carrier. No one other than KLM/Air France flies any domestic routes that are affected by this. And it only applies to domestic routes.