Oregon’s Mileage-Based Fee Program

CBS News reports on Oregon’s mileage-based user fee program, noting there is both support and opposition to the program. However, reporter Brook Silva-Braga notes that, not only that gas taxes aren’t working anymore, but that mileage-based fees can help relieve congestion.

Silva-Braka found someone who argued that charging user fees would hurt low-income people. But it would be better for low-income people to pay for what they use than to pay regressive taxes that often end up supporting programs used mainly by higher-income people.
Everything seems to be running amok, time seems to have gathered a really fast pace with everything going out of control. prescription for viagra It is important that viagra tablet in india a man and vice-versa. Take viagra france http://valsonindia.com/interview-in-dalastreet-2/?lang=eu soft tabs about 45 minutes or 1 hour before you have planned for your love making session. But the strange cheap cialis brand thing is that there is no signs of bacterial infection in the prostate through the medical examinations.
Silva-Braka also asked a supporter why people with electric cars shouldn’t get a break because they don’t contribute to climate change. The answer was that electric vehicles cause wear-and-tear on the roads just like petroleum-powered vehicles. Also worth noting is that people who own electric vehicles already get a break because, in Oregon, the electricity used to power their vehicles costs only about a third as much, per mile, as gasoline.

Like most television news coverage, this report was shallow and missed a lot of good points. But it was still a pretty good look at the issue of finding a better way to fund highways and other transportation.

Tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

6 Responses to Oregon’s Mileage-Based Fee Program

  1. Ted says:

    “Silva-Braka also asked a supporter why people with electric cars shouldn’t get a break because they don’t contribute to climate change.”

    Sure they do. Are reporters this stupid or simply mendacious that they don’t know or refuse to admit that 70% of electricity is generated from fossil fuels? The source of the emissions is simply moved from a tailpipe to a power plant.

    Rare earth metals don’t just magically appear at battery factories. They’re shipped using fossil fuels.

  2. prk166 says:

    People need to stop it with the bullshit claim that EVs don’t pollute.

  3. prk166 says:


    Also worth noting is that people who own electric vehicles already get a break because, in Oregon, the electricity used to power their vehicles costs only about a third as much, per mile, as gasoline.
    ” ~anti-planner

    For the time being. It won’t be able to remain that way given the trillions needed for building out a grid that can handle electrict-everything.

  4. LazyReader says:

    EV”s don’t pollute. During the driving phase of their life expectancy. Manufacturing and disposal; they’re a mess.
    Regardless, Mileage based user fees are a death nail for transit providers, since they finance significant portions of their systems by pilfering highway Trust fund, a system that efficiently dedicates finances to it’s exact purpose, is TOO efficient for an agency that thrives on waste.

  5. Ted says:

    “EV”s don’t pollute. During the driving phase of their life expectancy.”

    This is false. While they may not produce emissions directly, they cause pollution by using electricity produced from fossil fuels. Again, 70% of the electricity is generated with fossil fuels, meaning an EV is still causing pollution though use of and increased demand for electricity. An electric car recharged by a coal-fired plant produces as much CO2 as a gasoline-powered car that gets 29 miles per gallon.

    And they pollute in other ways. They still use and discard tires. They use transmission, brake, steering, and cooling fluids as well as grease.

    They also need battery replacement at a max of about 65,000 miles, which is in the driving phase of life expectancy. Spent batteries are pollution, and as previously mentioned, manufacturing and shipping batteries causes pollution.

  6. Sandy Teal says:

    So now the government will track your every movement. Of course they will promise it will be “private” but immediately it will be used for law enforcement, then soon for “existential” global warming problems, then the next pandemic will require severe travel limitations, etc.

    We are way past the time you can believe any data will be kept private by the government.

Leave a Reply