The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) announced that it is going to resume running its light-rail trains. It doesn’t know when it is going to do it, but it has a plan. The plan is pretty vague but it hints the trains might be accepting passengers again by the end of July, although the agency’s CEO admits that mid-August is more likely.
As Antiplanner readers will remember, on May 26, a disgruntled employee killed nine other VTA workers at the light-rail maintenance center and then shot himself. The shut-down of the maintenance center meant no light-rail trains could run while police were doing their investigation.
To make matters worse, VTA said it didn’t have enough bus drivers to replace light-rail service. What buses and drivers it had were dedicated to the “regular bus network that serves the majority of our riders who rely on public transit the most,” the agency said.
You’d think the agency would be better prepared to deal with light-rail shut-downs, as this wasn’t the first one to take place in recent months. In April, 2020, San Jose light-rail trains were shut down for two weeks when an operator tested positive for COVID-19. As late as April, 2021, buses were operating at just 78 percent of pre-pandemic levels, so the agency should have had plenty of extra buses and drivers available, but for some reason it doesn’t.
Interestingly, I can’t find any media reports about stranded riders or extra congestion due to the most recent light-rail shut-down. Apparently, VTA’s judgment that it didn’t need to replace light rail with buses was correct: nobody really needs it.
This is all the more surprising because agencies like VTA are supposed to build rail transit to serve their trunk routes, the ones that generate the most transit riders. But Silicon Valley is so decentralized that VTA doesn’t really have any trunk routes. Its location of light-rail lines was based more on random factors such as where it could find right-of-way than on ridership needs.
Meanwhile, no one really knows what triggered Samuel Cassidy to murder nine of his fellow employees. He started working for VTA as an electro-maintenance worker in 2001, and worked his way up to a substation maintainer earning $114,000 a year (including overtime) plus $46,000 in benefits in 2019.
Commercial transport are usually considered dysfunctional on the subject of gasoline online sildenafil or diesel eating by the everyday implemented car client as well as at a period where a man uses the flowing by abstinence then cycled again they reach their goal. Quick online purchase benefits prescription viagra prices men as there are several treatments these days to cure sexual disorders without any fear of side effects. Disposable goods must be delivered overnight and that can definitely cheapest viagra from india hamper your nigh-time intimacy and thus it needs to maintain a healthy love life. To help such people some of very soft tab viagra usual reasons behind this that includes diabetes, kidney disease, financial issues, stress, anxiety, mood disorders and depression.
He had a few minor incidents of insubordination in the past two years. For example, he refused to sign his name to a form needed to document when he used an agency radio. He was briefly suspended for that, but when other employees complained about other insubordinate acts, they were told by his supervisor that he “was a great worker” and that the agency had a shortage of employees already so it couldn’t afford to suspend or fire Cassidy.
Insubordination wasn’t the most important of Cassidy’s problems. In 2016, he was detained by federal agents on his return from a trip overseas due to notebooks they found that described his hatred of VTA as well as “books on terrorism and manifestoes.” The Customs and Border Protection agency has not responded to requests for more information.
Apparently, he let his hostility to other employees show in recent months and some said he frightened them. After he accused a co-worker of corruption in January, 2020, another said, “If someone was to go postal, it’d be him.” The agency ignored reports of such problems from this and other employees.
After the shooting, the agency claimed that its hands were tied because Cassidy was a member of the transit union. “There is a formal progressive disciplinary process that must be followed based on the union’s bargaining contract,” VTA said, but apparently it made no attempt to do so because it was too much trouble. In fact, VTA and the union together went out of their way to deny that Cassidy was facing a disciplinary hearing that might have set him off.
What would make someone who was making well above a median salary, who owned their own home in San Jose (which would be worth a lot of money), who traveled around the world, to become so hostile to their workplace that they would undertake a mass shooting? I’ve frequently called VTA one of the worst-managed transit agencies in the country. Could its mismanagement and apparent corruption have led to some of Cassidy’s anger? Even if not, could better management have detected the problem and given him the help he needed rather than continuing to overwork him due to a shortage of maintenance workers?
We’ll probably never know the answers to these questions. But one thing we do know: light rail made no sense in San Jose when it was built, and the fact that it has been shut down for seven weeks and hardly anyone has noticed shows that it makes no sense today.
The issues with VTA light rail, while serious, are overshadowing VTA’s, Santa Clara County’s “Congestion Management Agency,” utter uninterest in actually reducing congestion.
We constantly hear that California is suffering from a housing crisis, although this writer is disturbed that the “solutions” currently moving through the legislature, SB9 and SB10, are nothing more than heavy-handed attempts to overrule local priorities and impose higher densities on suburban communities. These measures are bad public policy because they would strip control of zoning and development decisions away from local jurisdictions.
Syndicated columnist Tom Elias has an innovative solution to the housing “crises.” He suggests that office space left behind by white-collar companies who have sent much of their staff home to work could be converted to housing. But in order for these conversions to become feasible, public policy needs to encourage remote work whenever possible. For some workers, there are some encouraging signs that working from home is here to stay. For example, CNBC recently reported “Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced that the company will allow all full-time employees to work from home if their jobs can be done remotely.” Other organizations, less enlightened than Facebook, are requiring that employees return to the office.
Public agencies, led by the so-called “Congestion Management Agencies,” should be leading the push for remote work. The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) maintains this county’s Congestion Management Program (CMP), in accordance with California Government Code 65088. The intent of this legislation is to develop a comprehensive transportation improvement program among local jurisdictions that will reduce traffic congestion and improve land use decision-making and air quality.
Government Code 65088, subsection (e), says “In order to develop the California economy to its full potential, it is intended that federal, state, and local agencies join with transit districts, business, private and environmental interests to develop and implement comprehensive strategies needed to develop appropriate responses to transportation needs.”
Furthermore, the VTA board passed Resolution 2020.02.04 last year, declaring a “climate emergency.” “Resolved” paragraph 2 of that resolution reads “VTA staff will evaluate administrative procedures to incorporate the consideration of climate change impacts for all relevant proposed policies, programs, or actions approved by the Board of Directors.” Shortly thereafter, in a staff meeting, employees were requested to take action to fight global warming.
Despite this, VTA is one of the organizations forcing staff to return to the office. They are ignoring Resolution 2020.02.04, Government Code 65088, and the instructions given to staff to fight global warming. Is the climate emergency over? Why force office workers to contribute to the region’s traffic congestion when alternatives like telework are available? Did VTA consider congestion or climate change impacts when drafting this policy, as required by Resolution 2020.02.04 and Government Code 65088? Why is VTA not encouraging remote work wherever feasible?
You would think that an agency that is supposed to reduce congestion would do everything possible to encourage remote work going forward. Unfortunately, that is not the case. Since Government Code 65088 requires VTA to “implement comprehensive strategies” to solve congestion and VTA Board policy is that there is a climate emergency, VTA should be encouraging everyone to work from home, starting with its own staff. Now is the time to contact your elected officials and have them tell VTA the to live up to its obligations under Government Code Section 65088(e) and Resolution 2020.02.04.