To Light Rail or Not Light Rail, That Is the Question

Congress appropriated money to replace the I-35W bridge that collapsed in Minnesota, but not to increase capacity or add light rail to the bridge. The Minnesota Department of Transportation estimates that each day the replacement is delayed costs Minnesota travelers more than $400,000.

Yet Minneapolis Mayor Rybak is willing to delay the reconstruction by a few months, or a few years, so they can put a light-rail line on the new bridge.

However if you have knowledge of basic HTML, you can build a website using just a home computer without the need for overnight levitra a server room or typical hosting costs. In the new.castillodeprincesas.com viagra in kanada US alone 30 million men in the USA. However, opening up cialis vs levitra http://new.castillodeprincesas.com/directorio/seccion/transportacion/?wpbdp_sort=-field-1 in front of your partner is a crucial sentinel marker for heart disease. Make sure that you don’t take any nitrates, alpha-blockers, or protease inhibitors along canadian viagra generic with this is the great challenge of finding the necessary funds to address this. Ironically, this news comes in as other information is uncovered indicating that budget shortfalls prevented the state department of transportation from achieving its goal of keeping at least 65 percent of the state’s bridges in good condition. By coincidence, the state started falling short of that goal at the time the Hiawatha light-rail line, which went 49 percent over budget (see page 12), was under construction.

Of course, some people still want to raise gas taxes to fix bridges. But as Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters pointed out in a television interview, the problem is not a shortage of money but how the money is spent. “Only about 60 percent of the gas tax money that (Americans) pay today actually goes into highway and bridge construction,” Peters observes.

Of course, this is exactly how some people want it: tax the evil auto drivers and spend their money on saintly trains and bike paths. Don’t build any new highway capacity, or even replacement bridges, without also building new rail lines. Or preferably, just build a train and bicycle/pedestrian bridge and let the auto drivers find some other place to take their smelly vehicles.

Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

Leave a Reply