An Aussie who calls himself the Unconventional Economist, also known as Leith van Onselen, created and posted this little cartoon about dealing with regional planners. He based much of it on a script by another blogger named Ross Elliot.
It has been alleged as a splendid quality of anti-impotence pills, which aids ease down unica-web.com levitra on line sale the issue of male impotence. Most of these entities have made email marketing viagra online in india work for them in a truly unique way. Benign Prostate Hyperplasia: What is it? Benign Prostate Hyperplasia, complications of prostate cancer therapy, Pediatric urologic conditions like disorders of the genitalia, neurogenic bladder, enuresis, genitourinary tumors and Male fertility and sexual health conditions such as erectile dysfunction, Peyronie’s disease, retrograde ejaculation, varicocele, hormone imbalance. ordering levitra online The known ranges have historically read as: Normal: Less than 120 over 80 Prehypertension: 120 to 139 over 80 to 89 Stage 1 levitra for sale online high BP: 140 to 159 over 90 to 99 Stage 2 high BP: 160 and above over 100 and above High blood pressure in people who are suffering from high blood pressure. Admittedly, some of the statements made by the planner in the animation are a bit far fetched–real planners would never admit to such things. But it brings home a fundamental question: why should government agencies have the power to make some people rich and impoverish others?
The Unconventional Economist, by the way, has written an impressive series of articles on housing bubbles and policies in various countries, including Canada, China, Germany (one country that didn’t have a bubble), the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. He has also written about U.S. housing markets, including California, Phoenix, and Texas, and of course plenty of posts about Australia. The Antiplanner agrees with almost everything he says, which means many readers of this blog will not.
The fact van Onselen re-posted an article by Wendell Cox, well known and multiple times proven prevericator, on his blog is enough to discredit him in my book.
When is a taking not a taking? When it’s conservation.
.
Who cares what you think, msetty. You believe that anyone opposed to rail out of concern for its cost and low utility is mentally ill.
Metrosucks, you only hate rail, because it’s rail.
Roads get unlimited funding though don’t worry about costs there.
metrosucks wrote:
Who cares what you think, msetty. You believe that anyone opposed to rail out of concern for its cost and low utility is mentally ill.
metrosucks, I tend to agree with you much more than I disagree with you – but – the above was uncalled for. And I am motivated to say that precisely because I usually agree with you.
On the flipside, I probably disagree with msetty more than I agree with him, but so what? He offers comments here that are generally respectful and polite.
msetty wrote:
The fact van Onselen re-posted an article by Wendell Cox, well known and multiple times proven prevericator, on his blog is enough to discredit him in my book.
Uncalled for. The above sounds like guilt by association.
For the record, I have known Wendell for many years, and yes, I usually agree with him. Agree or disagree with Wendell, I don’t think he tries to hide his point of view.
Point taken, CP. But I can never bring myself to view msetty as a reasonable or nice individual. He views those of us who disagree with him, with no more than contempt.
metrosucks said: Point taken, CP. But I can never bring myself to view msetty as a reasonable or nice individual. He views those of us who disagree with him, with no more than contempt.
THWM: I don’t agree with every thing the Mr.Setty has said either, though at least he’s not a fucking sociopath like you, CPZ, O’Toole & Cox!
why should government agencies have the power to make some people rich and impoverish others?
Exactly why the OWS movement has traction. The concentration of wealth in this country has all but eliminated democracy here.
Nonetheless, several planning websites have similar videos with ‘planners’ lamenting the process handed to them by electeds and the system. Easily found.
DS
Nonetheless, several planning websites have similar videos with ‘planners’ lamenting the process handed to them by electeds and the system. Easily found.
Hmm, let’s see. Here is what your typical planner really thinks, and I quote:
What are some of the remaining tactics and events most likely to motivate progressive advocates in the future?
1. An enormous (and preferably abrupt) increase in the cost of gas, utilities or food. The important caution, however, is that these can lead to reactionary, militarized, autocratic politics.
2. A severe economic recession or depression, although Maslow’s Hierarchy of needs instructs us that progressive politics often plays second fiddle when one needs to first figure out how to put food on the table.
3. Severe traffic congestion, although this can counterproductively and ruinously lead uninformed communities to widen the road. Road widening as a response to congestion, however, is now much less likely given the extreme financial crisis being suffered at all levels of government.
from http://domz60.wordpress.com/, where even more vile hate of this kind is spewed, daily.
Metrosucks, you’re a damn sociopath!