Regional Transit for Indy?

The Antiplanner was invited back to Indianapolis yesterday to testify to the Senate Tax and Fiscal Policy Committee on a proposal to create a regional transit agency for Indianapolis. Currently, the transit agency is limited to serving Marion County, but Indianapolis suburbs extend well beyond that county’s limits.

While this seems like a no-brainer, it is not. Proponents of regional transit have made it clear that they want to build a light-rail line that will cost well over a billion dollars and either bus-rapid transit on dedicated lanes or light-rail lines in other parts of the region. Even if that weren’t the case, the regional transit idea is just another case of “bigger is better,” when in fact allowing smaller transit agencies to cross county lines if that is where their patrons want to go could be far more efficient.

If they are not, you will viagra canada know, and move on. Women, who are consuming anti depressants, mood stabilizers and birth control pills, they have also given complaints including https://pdxcommercial.com/property/1105-portland-avenue-gladstone/1105-portland-ave-brochure/ viagra effects women dry vagina, low sex drive, lack of libido and inability to have one. There are viagra online in india many men who are suffering from this problem. For instance, buy generic viagra if you are diabetic, controlling your sugar levels effectively. The Antiplanner argued that the regional transit plan is likely to make Indianapolis more congested, at a higher cost, yet won’t help transit riders, particularly low-income riders who lack access to cars. While it probably had nothing to do with anything I said, as soon as I was done with my testimony, the committee unanimously voted to send the proposal to an interim study committee, effectively deferring it for another year.

You can download my testimony in PDF (2.8 MB) or Word format.

Tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

6 Responses to Regional Transit for Indy?

  1. LazyReader says:

    The truth of the matter is they want to expand past the county to extend into it’s suburbs to take advantage of whatever new taxing strategy they have for it. Gain the tax revenue from outlying suburbs to pay for it’s city financial woes. New York City operates it’s subway, it receives subsidies from every level. Municipal, State and Federal, despite the impressive number it operates at at a deficit. But private companies built many of New York’s subways and ran them until government forcibly took them over? When the companies tried to raise the fare from five cents to ten. People cried foul, so much so the press and the politicians got wind of it. The government created the MTA and took over the subways promising they wouldn’t raise the fares; and surprise they did. Today it’s $2.50 . Worse they make false promises. The Second Avenue subway has been on the back burner time and again for seven decades. It now expects to it to be finished no sooner than the 2020’s and cost 17 billion dollars. The New York transit strike illustrated two of the dangers of an overgrown government. When you let government monopolize something, you invite stifling disruption when government fails. “Bigger is better” is not a philosophy for transit schemes. They build gleaming expensive systems and undercut the economic model of “better, faster……..cheaper!”. Worse they undercut everybody by taxing people who won’t even benefit from a light rail going through their town and undercut the lowest income earners whom depend on transit (cheap transit) the most. Rail transit screws the poor; Cutting service for working-class and poor customers, and dismantling a functioning mass transit system, all in the service of a fantasy that was pushed on an unwilling populace by liberal elites who can afford luxury hybrids.

  2. LazyReader says:

    Does the Antiplanner have information regarding the National Highway Trust. I’ve heard that some have stated the Trust has had to have been “bailed out” several times in the same way as Wall Street Banks an.

  3. Frank says:

    Totally OT: The Highwayman and Metrosucks and Dan are gone. MSetty shows up to ask you to pay for his mail. Bennett is still cool. LazyReader is still … lazy. Sandy keeps on keeping on. New peeps stop by.

    It’s been a weird six years. I think I’ve had all I’ve had to say about transit, automobiles, streetcars, and so on. I stopped by because of public lands. Having worked for the NPS and the USFS, and having many co-workers and friends working for the other public lands in the alphabet soup, I must admit my specialiaties are limited to to that, particularly the NPS. That said, the NPS and my concern for natural/primitive/wilderness areas are what brought me to libertarianism and ultimately led me to anarcho-capitalism. With that said, I really have nothing left to add to the discussion. I’ll still avidly read this blog and combat the trolls, but until the discussion turns to public lands, count me out.

    Enjoy your MFing expensive street cars.

    Hasta la vista.

    “Frank”

  4. msetty says:

    Hasta la vista, Frank. Don’t let the door I’m pushing closed slam your on your butt on the way out.

    Dan left because he doesn’t see the value of arguing with extremists, and I’m pretty much in agreement with him, except to say “hasta la vista” to one anyway. And I guess Metrosucks climbed back under his rock.

  5. metrosucks says:

    I read this blog religiously. I just no longer post because it immediately brings out the raving extremists and their abuse (You know of who I speak). It’s truly ironic that msetty implies that Danny boy is not an extremist. It’s also ironic that one speaks msetty’s moniker, and he pops up like a jumping jack.

    I have concluded, and I am sure Frank has as well, that it is better to simply let economic law deal with the frenzied fantasies of msetty and his friends. There are already cracks in the facade in places like Portland, and it won’t be long before that spreads to every other “green” addicted metro area. I won’t argue with his kind anymore because it brings out the worst in me and makes him feel very smug.

  6. the highwayman says:

    Mr.Setty, arguing continually with crooked extremists is pretty much futile, but I still take a look at this blog occasionally.

    This blog is about politics and has absolutely nothing to do with economics.

    Roads are not subjected to economic tests, yet they don’t complain that socialism. :$

Leave a Reply