The Antiplanner is flying to Washington DC today to testify at a hearing tomorrow on federal grants for transit capital projects, also known as New Starts. My testimony will summarize my recent paper on the subject: that the New Starts grant-making Choose a sports Osteopath you feel comfortable with-someone whom order tadalafil online you can examine your disease. It is not cosmetic enhancement procedure, in fact it includes grafting of tendons and muscles from viagra online ordering other parts into the base of penis which makes it look big in size. Be sure to tell your doctor if you have had a hearty or fatty meal, tadalafil 20mg uk as this could slow down the positive effects. Enjoy life with the healthy and natural foods! If you are looking to better maintain your sexual function and appropriate levitra purchase cholesterol levels. process gives transit agencies incentives to choose high-cost solutions; that buses are superior to rails in almost every place agencies want to build new rail lines; and that transit riders suffer when agencies cannibalize their bus systems to pay for the rails.
Back in the Air Again
Bookmark the permalink.
The Antiplanner wrote:
that transit riders suffer when agencies cannibalize their bus systems to pay for the rails.
[sarcasm]
I am shocked, just shocked, that the Antiplanner would mention such a thing, before the Congress, no less.
[/sarcasm]
That transit riders suffer when agencies cannibalize their bus systems to pay for the rails is the killer bipartisan argument.
I suppose the counter argument will be that changing bus lines to funnel transit riders onto the rails is more efficient, but I doubt that will hold up to scrutiny. Transferring is a big time waster outside of busy rush hour time periods.
I’m trying to find out if the constitutionality of Councils of Government has been challenged in court before. Would you or someone else happen to know the answer to that?