Still No Infrastructure Crisis

Another year, another spate of stories about how America’s infrastructure is crumbling and how we need to raise taxes to repair it. Here’s the reality: Infrastructure that is funded out of user fees is in good shape; infrastructure that is funded out of taxes is not. Those who benefit from tax-supported infrastructure want the people who use user-fee supported infrastructure to pay more taxes so the former can continue to enjoy their obsolete systems at little cost to themselves.

Oregon Representative Earl Blumenauer wants to increase gas taxes by 15 cents a gallon–nearly double what they are now–to fund transportation infrastructure. But America’s highways, which support the users who pay those gas taxes, are in good shape. The number of structurally deficient bridges is rapidly declining and the average smoothness of pavement is improving.

It’s not hard to see that doubling gas taxes also doubles the money going into rail transit and other slush funds. The Federal Transit Administration said in 2010 that transit agencies suffer from a $78 billion maintenance backlog, and the total has likely increased since then since the agencies were spending less than necessary to keep systems in their current state of poor repair.

Will Congress use an infusion of money to repair or demolish obsolete rail lines? It doesn’t seem likely, since Congress had the opportunity in 2012 to rededicate money it was spending on new rail transit lines to rehabilitation, and it specifically wrote in the law it passed that none of the money could be spent on such rehabilitation. So it seems probable that a doubling of gas taxes would simply lead to more grants to transit agencies to build new rail lines that they can’t afford to maintain.
However, irrelevant levitra generic cialis icks.org sale of products containing Melanotan 2on the internet has come under scanner for causing serious health maladies and abandoned by several countries for such reasons. Furthermore, there are side effects of some medicines such as SSRIs, anti-androgens, 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors, buy discount viagra opioid analgesics have been found perilous for men’s sexual health. bought here buy cialis usa It is done to find out if the pharmacy is genuine and trustworthy. It’s all about how much and what you want generico levitra on line in bed.
We don’t need to take care of infrastructure by increasing taxes; we need to find better ways to pay for infrastructure with user fees. A year ago, Representative Blumenauer actually introduced a bill that would do so by replacing gas taxes with vehicle-mile fees. But he seems to have lost interest, perhaps because there’s no guarantee that transit advocates will be able to steal 20 percent of vehicle-mile fees to subsidize their obsessions.

The Reason Foundation’s Robert Poole is a little more worried than the Antiplanner about the future of the Interstate Highway System. He points out it was built with a 50-year design life and much of it is about 50 years old now. But that doesn’t mean it faces a financial crisis, and in fact the interstate system is, on average, in the best overall shape of any part of our highway system.

Poole wants Congress to allow states to electronically toll the interstates so they can raise money to restore and improve the system as needed. This would also cut out the federal middleman in the funding system. While the Antiplanner certainly supports that idea, I don’t see it as part of a crisis; merely the opportunity to take advantage of new technologies (electronic tolling) that weren’t available when the system was first built.

Congress has a bad habit of acting only when there is a crisis. This gives interest groups, bureaucracies, and political leaders incentives to manufacture such crises so they can provoke changes that benefit them. Taxpayers should always be wary of claims that any kind of crisis exists, for they are almost always going to be the losers when the bureaucracies and interest groups agree on any solutions.

Tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

6 Responses to Still No Infrastructure Crisis

  1. LazyReader says:

    Yeah, our Interstate is old. but so what……..what is a road. It’s a piece of concrete with asphalt on it. Not exactly a precision piece of engineering. If the Romans could build roads that last 2,000 years, we could certainly built roads that last 50.

  2. JOHN1000 says:

    Every several months, one group or another states that the infrastructure “crisis” needs $400 billion or $500 billion to solve the crises.

    When I point out that Obama had over $700 billion available to do just that – but little if any infrastructure spending resulted. When i ask where the money went, I generally am called a racist or other such names.

    The same thing will happen with any $ that gets raised by taxes – you will pay more taxes but the “crisis” will still be there. And when they think you forgot, they will assert the same “crisis” again as an excuse to tax even more. It seems to work pretty well.

  3. Sandy Teal says:

    John100 raises some good questions that the Antiplanner might want to look into.

    1. What part of the infrastructure problem was fixed with the Stimulus Bill, and if not all of it, why was the crumbling infrastructure not fixed at a time we were desperately looking for worthwhile projects?

    2. What can be done to have needed infrastructure projects “shovel ready” for the next recession and call for a huge stimulus bill? Or is that just a recipe for pork and abuse?

  4. bennett says:

    I know that a ton of projects built with stimulus money were “shovel ready” but not “crumbling infrastructure.” Everywhere I go I see the ARRA sign on new State, County and local facilities. The stimulus was used by many to build new facilities, some rather nice ones at that.

  5. bennett says:

    “America’s highways, which support the users who pay those gas taxes, are in good shape… It’s not hard to see that doubling gas taxes also doubles the money going into rail transit and other slush funds.”

    I’m not in favor of a gas tax hike. I’m also not going to advocate for any rail projects (other than a select few high capacity regional proposals).

    The Reason/CATO/Antiplanner highway fetish ignores some harsh realities. Mainly the fact that highways would be utterly obsolete if not for the thoroughfares, arterial roads and local streets that bring people to the highways. Many (most) of these right of ways are not paid for with user fees, nor is it feasible for a user fee system (are you going to toll my afternoon walk?). I’m all for an increase in user fee systems (and would love to see more pro VMT arguments around here), but in a fully integrated, multi-modal mobility network, user fee-only approaches are not going to cut it.

    Not everything is a highway. If it’s not a highway it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s a rail transit boondoggle.

  6. Dan says:

    I’m not in favor of a gas tax hike.

    What do you suggest to make up for the shortfall built up over 20+ years?

    DS

Leave a Reply