The Ratings Game

Lots of groups have been blamed for the recent financial crisis, including the Federal Reserve, banks, and Congress for deregulating financial institutions by repealing the Glass-Steagall Act (which separated banks that accepted deposits from investment banks). One that deserves scrutiny is the ratings agencies–Moody’s, Standard & Poors, and Fitch–that gave AAA ratings to bonds made up of subprime loans.

The ratings agencies definitely have a lot to answer for. Historically, only one in 10,000 AAA bonds defaults in an average year. So banks and other financial institutions confidently invested in AAA mortgage bonds only to see the value of those bonds fall dramatically.

Continue reading

Antiplanner’s Library: Freefall

Nobel-prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz‘s take on the 2008 financial crisis is simple: Free markets are bad; government is good; we need more government. This is, essentially, a reiteration of what is known as the Greenwald-Stiglitz theorem, which states that markets are imperfect, so “government could potentially almost always improve upon the market’s resource allocation.”

A flaw common to both the Greenwald-Stiglitz theorem and Freefall is that, while Stiglitz goes to great efforts to show that markets are imperfect, he makes no effort at all to show that government will do better. His theorem says government could potentially do better, and another one of his theorems says an “ideal government” could do better, but the real question, which he never addresses, is whether a real, not ideal, imperfect government will actually do any better than an imperfect market.

Freefall makes no genuine effort to analyze the causes of the 2008 financial meltdown. Instead, Stiglitz merely uses it as another example in his case for bigger government. The crisis resulted from the failure of American capitalism, he says, and he dismisses any other explanation (if he mentions it at all) as “sheer nonsense” (p. 10).

Continue reading

Antiplanner’s Library: Fool’s Gold

As previously noted, the Antiplanner has been reading a lot of books about the financial crisis lately. Some have tried (but failed) to be comprehensive. Most cover just a slice of the crisis, such as Bear Stearns (House of Cards) or Lehman Brothers (A Colossal Failure of Common Sense)

One of the most valuable books of the latter sort is Fool’s Gold, which focuses on J.P. Morgan. Curiously, this book has gone through a series of at least four subtitles:

  1. How an Ingenious Tribe of Bankers Rewrote the Rules of Finance, Made a Fortune and Survived a Catastrophe
  2. How Unrestrained Greed Corrupted a Dream, Shattered Global Markets, and Unleashed a Catastrophe
  3. How the Bold Dream of a Small Tribe at J.P. Morgan was Corrupted by Wall Street Greed and Unleashed a Catastrophe
  4. The Inside Story of J.P. Morgan and How Wall St. Greed Corrupted Its Bold Dream and Created a Financial Catastrophe

Continue reading

Antiplanner’s Library: Too Big to Fail

The Antiplanner finished reading Too Big to Fail, a 539-page tome describing the events of the financial crisis from the Bear Stearns collapse in March, 2008 to the Treasury’s forced purchase of billions of dollars worth of shares in nine major banks in October, 2008. New York Times reporter Sorkin says the book is based on “more than five hundred hours of interviews with more than two hundred individuals who participated directly in the events surrounding the financial crisis.”

With the exception of an eleven-page epilogue, the author makes no apparent attempt to interject his own opinions about what happened. As such, the book represents the best and worst of modern journalism: the best because it appears to be a frank recitation of events on Wall Street, in the Fed, and the U.S. Treasury; and the worst because the accuracy of that recitation depends on who the author interviewed (whose names he doesn’t specifically reveal).

Continue reading

Selling off Assets

Back in 1993, the Antiplanner wrote a report titled Pork Barrel and the Environment warning environmentalists that the federal government could not sustain its current expenditures through 2020. Those who cared about public lands such as national forests and national parks, the Antiplanner advised, should work to fund those land entirely out of user fees, else someone else would soon propose to simply sell them.

Now, economist Niall Ferguson, writing in Newsweek, makes the case for selling most public lands as well as other federal assets. Ferguson observes that most of the debate over federal finances focuses on either raising taxes or reducing spending. He suggests that selling federal assets represents a third option.

Continue reading

The Antiplanner’s Library: The Economic Crisis

The 2008 financial crisis has proven to be a bonanza for at least one industry: Book publishers have issued dozens of tomes about what went wrong and how to fix it. Lately, the Antiplanner has been reading as many of these as possible.

Most of the authors have an axe to grind and many blame the crisis on one chief player: the Federal Reserve, private bankers, the mortgage industry, bond rating companies, politicians trying to increase homeownership, etc. Of course, loyal Antiplanner readers know the real culprit was growth-management planning, a thesis few of the book writers recognize–the main exception being Thomas Sowell in The Housing Boom and Bust.

In reading the other books, my goal has been to sift out the overblown rhetoric about greed and malice to find as many useful facts and insights as possible. Here are a few of the more interesting points.

Continue reading

Are We at the Bottom Yet?

According to economists at Moody’s, the housing market will bottom out in 2011–which means now may be the time to hunt for cheap homes and be ready to flip them when prices start going up. Unfortunately, the Antiplanner can’t afford the $250 required to listen to Moody’s webconference, so let’s look at some other data to see how likely it is that prices will start to recover.

First, we can go to the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), which publishes home price indices beginning in 1975 for states, metropolitan areas, and the nation as a whole. Many news reports rely on the Case-Schiller index, but that index only covers a selection of metro areas and misses many states. The FHFA uses the Case-Schiller methodology but has a much larger database.

The Antiplanner has made a user-friendly Excel chart from FHFA’s state data. Simply enter the two-letter acronyms of up to six states in cells BK150 to BP150, and the chart should update with those states. Nationally, housing prices peaked in the first quarter of 2007, declined through the second quarter of 2010, and recovered slightly in the third quarter of 2010. But, as averages of the country as a whole, national data do not provide very useful indicators of what is really happening in housing markets.

Continue reading

Are the Rich the Biggest Defaulters?

Last week, the New York Times published an amazingly shallow article saying the “biggest defaulters on mortgages are the rich.” This contention is supported by a single pair of data: the owners of about 14 percent of homes worth more than $1 million are delinquent on their mortgages, while only “about” 8 to 9 percent of homes worth less than $1 million are behind in their payments.

The problem is, what is the Times‘ definition of “rich”? As one of the paper’s columnists pointed out a few days later, “Just because you have a million-dollar mortgage doesn’t make you a millionaire.” And if you live in a state that has a lot of growth-management planning, such as California or Florida, chances are good that you own a house worth more than $1 million simply because the median price of homes in many cities in these states was close to that much (or, in a few cases, more) at the peak of the bubble.

Continue reading

Let Them Rent Tenements

A couple of weeks ago, Barney Frank (in explaining the financial crisis) said that we shouldn’t push “low income people into owning homes that they can’t afford.” Last week, an economist wrote in the Wall Street Journal that “the poor are better off renting.”

All of this pious blaming of the meltdown on poor people misses the point: the mortgage crisis wasn’t caused by poor people buying houses they couldn’t afford. It was caused by middle-class people buying homes made unaffordable by urban planners. As previously noted here, most foreclosures in the last couple of years happened to people with prime, not subprime, credit ratings, suggesting that most were middle class, not poor.

Continue reading

The Antiplanner’s Library: The Panic of 1907

The U.S. economy had grown rapidly for more than a decade, and even seemed to absorb a major natural disaster in stride. But then an unpredictable event triggered a panic, and suddenly banks closed, stock prices collapsed, and the entire world economy went into turmoil.

The many parallels between the panic of 1907 and the crash of 2008 suggest that this book — written just before the recent turmoil — deserves a close reading. The authors — two professors at the University of Virginia business school — provide an hour-by-hour account of the collapse and how New York bankers, led by J.P. Morgan, responded. But the book also provides a broad view of the conditions that led to the panic and how policy makers can respond to such panics.

Continue reading