The $4.5 Billion New Year’s Party

New York City celebrated the new year by opening the insanely expensive Second Avenue Subway. Just two miles and three stations long, this subway line cost nearly $4.5 billion, or more than $35,000 per inch, making it the most expensive subway in the world.

Of course, not all of that money went for digging tunnels and laying track, which cost “only” $734 million (which is still more than $5,000 per inch). The three stations cost $800 million each. But that’s not all: to complete the Second Avenue subway, the city also spend $500 million on engineering and $800 million for “management, real estate, station artwork, fare-collection systems and other sundry items.” If the entire New York City subway system cost that much, it would have cost more than $500 billion, or roughly the cost of the entire 47,856-mile Interstate Highway System in today’s dollars.

Of course, the city didn’t pay for it alone. The federal government chipped in at least $1.3 billion. The state of New York put in some money, but much of the money probably came from bridge tolls paid by auto drivers. Actual riders of the Second Avenue subway will pay very little of the cost and what they do pay will be paid indirectly.

When first proposed in the late 1920s, the line was expected to cost $86 million, which is less than a billion of today’s dollars. Later estimates turned out to be much higher, which is why they didn’t build it then. A more recent, 2007 estimate was about $3.7 billion, so it had about a $700 million cost overrun. But if it wasn’t worth building in 1929, why was it worth building today?

Yes, if you have experienced such things, you should then better visit free viagra india the doctor. And after all, Nocturnal Penile Tumescence is necessary for your penis. buy female viagra Each dose found to be adequate to offer a full price for levitra course of intercourse, from erection to pinnacle. A series of small studies on hair texture indicates no cialis canadian pharmacy change from taking Propecia. The Second Avenue subway’s cost overrun nothing compared with the overrun for the East Side Access line to connect the Long Island Railroad with Grand Central Terminal. According to the state, it was originally projected to cost $4.3 billion and open in 2009. It is currently projected to cost $10.2 billon, or 137 percent more than projected, and will open no sooner than the end of 2022.

But the Second Avenue subway is nowhere near complete so it will have a chance to catch up and exceed the cost of the East Side Access. The city wants to extend the subway six more miles, which will bring the total cost at least $17 billion. Between the Second Avenue Subway and the East Side Access, the nation could have built more than 2,500 miles of four-lane interstate freeways. (The Interstate Highway System cost about $10 million per mile in today’s dollars and Texas is building four-lane freeways today at that cost.)

What’s really going on here is subsidies to density. There’s nothing wrong with expensive subways if users are willing to pay for them. But given a choice between multibillion-dollar-per-mile subways and a lower-density area where most transportation costs far less, most employers and residents would choose the lower densities. People tolerate Manhattan’s densities only because other people subsidize those densities.

Many economists say such densities are worthwhile because of agglomerative economies and the value of face-to-face communications. but do 2.2 million people really need to work on a 22-square-mile island (most of them in just seven of those square miles), or is a lot of it just ego on the part of banking and other executives? If the densities were truly worthwhile, they wouldn’t need subsidies and $2.2-billion-per-mile subways.

Of course, people will claim that suburbs are subsidized as well. So let’s get rid of all subsidies and let people live where they want and pay for where they live, not where someone else wants to live. Otherwise, the only real winners are the downtown property owners.

Tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

4 Responses to The $4.5 Billion New Year’s Party

  1. JimKarlock says:

    Why don’t the downtown businesses/landowners pay for that portions (90%??) of transit that goes downtown?
    Or tax each area by the number of boardings/deboradings in each area.
    Same sort of allocation scheme for the cost of utilities.

    thanks
    JK

  2. prk166 says:


    $800 million for “management, real estate, station artwork, fare-collection systems and other sundry items.”

    Unless the real estate was very, very expensive even by Manhattan standards, that has a smell of cronism and corruption.

  3. Sketter says:

    I would be curious how much of those subsidies or tax dollars was NYC residents or businesses tax dollars and just took a detour through D.C. or Albany before it went back to the city.

  4. JOHN1000 says:

    The population serviced by the new subway line is much more affluent than the subway ridership as a whole. They can afford to pay a much higher fare.

    Charge $5.00 or so to ride that two miles and then pay the regular fare for the rest of the subway system.

    Basically, a user fee for a luxury line. Cars now pay to use HOV’s in some areas–with the fees adjusted per congestion.

    The 2 mile subway could do the same.

Leave a Reply