The Antiplanner

The Movement to Driverless Cars

16th November 2009

The Movement to Driverless Cars

posted in Transportation |

The idea of driverless cars is beginning to catch on. An intermediate step, road trains, is being planned in various parts of Europe. Under this concept, one vehicle (identified in the news stories as being driven by a “professional driver”) leads the way, and others get in line. The drivers of the following vehicles can read, watch a movie, or go to sleep until they decide to leave the train.

Meanwhile, Volkswagen’s Audi division plans to test its completely driverless technology with a high-speed drive up Pikes Peak. Volkswagen also speculates on what cars will be like in 2028.

The BBC observes that driverless cars will help reduce congestion. And Slate correspondent William Saletan endorses driverless cars for highway safety.

In related news, former GMC Research Vice President Larry Burns has co-authored a new book, Reinventing the Automobile. Burns led GMC’s winning contribution to the DARPA Urban Challenge and says, “Government regulation, liability laws and other issues pose a bigger impediment to driverless cars than any technical hurdles.” However, his book–scheduled for publication in 2010–appears to focus more on improving the energy efficiency of autos, not driverless cars.

This entry was posted on Monday, November 16th, 2009 at 12:00 am and is filed under Transportation. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

There are currently 11 responses to “The Movement to Driverless Cars”

Please feel free to submit comments. Constructive debate is welcome. Ad hominem attacks and name-calling will reveal the shallowness of the author. Foul language may be deleted. Your first comment will require moderation; after that, all comments will be approved unless they contain too many links in which case the software may hold them for approval as potential spam.

  1. 1 On November 16th, 2009, Mike said:

    That drive up Pike’s Peak is like one long extended heart attack. If VW succeeds and manages to bring their cars safely up and back, count me impressed.

    posted on November 16th, 2009 at 8:39 am

  2. 2 On November 16th, 2009, Frank said:

    Here’s a solution for the drunk driving problem.

    posted on November 16th, 2009 at 10:18 am

  3. 3 On November 16th, 2009, t g said:

    As is my standard, waaaay off topic: Wendell Cox is making a Canadian highway proposal which is as ludicrous as the HSR maps. Think the Antiplanner will comment on his faithful ally? No, probably not. I guess spending $61.5 Billion of federal money is okay when it’s not OUR federal money.

    posted on November 16th, 2009 at 2:22 pm

  4. 4 On November 16th, 2009, t g said:

    Hey, O’toole, very nice Edit/Delete option. First I’ve seen on a Blog. Kudos.

    posted on November 16th, 2009 at 2:23 pm

  5. 5 On November 17th, 2009, Mike said:

    t g,

    As a purely commercial subsidy, the Canadian highway plan is one I would oppose. Interstate highways have a legitimate military use, though, so they are justified on that ground — and perhaps with user fees, the cost could be mitigated to some extent.

    posted on November 17th, 2009 at 8:14 am

  6. 6 On November 17th, 2009, prk166 said:

    Pikes Peak won’t be easy but a better test would be something like Mosquito Pass.

    posted on November 17th, 2009 at 11:29 am

  7. 7 On November 17th, 2009, prk166 said:

    BTW – The Karlock Canada thing was a bit bewildering. I don’t see why Canada should be going forward with pieces of it unless it’s going to 100% pay for itself. I have a reply started that I saved in an email to post at some other time when I’m up for it. Off hand a few of the things mentioned in there made sense, a few others didn’t.

    posted on November 17th, 2009 at 11:56 am

  8. 8 On November 17th, 2009, Tad Winiecki said:

    The implications of these automation advances include:
    Parents won’t have to drive their cars to take their children to school, soccer practice, etc.; the cars will drive themselves.
    Robotaxis will be more economical than buses and streetcars to take people without driver licenses where and when they want to go and it will be door to door.
    Paratransit with drivers for the handicapped will diminish to those who need attendants to help them travel; the rest will travel in specially -equipped robotaxis.
    Car sharing will be more popular when you don’t need a driver license and you don’t have to go to the car or take it back to a designated space – you call it on your cellphone; it comes to you and when you don’t need it goes away and parks itself.
    Assuming the automated cars drive more carefully and avoid accidents better, car insurance rates should go down.
    Overall, another instance of automation improving productivity and our standard of living, just as automating elevators and telephone switchboards did fifty years ago.

    posted on November 17th, 2009 at 5:59 pm

  9. 9 On November 18th, 2009, the highwayman said:

    Mike said: As a purely commercial subsidy, the Canadian highway plan is one I would oppose. Interstate highways have a legitimate military use, though, so they are justified on that ground.

    THWM: That’s hypocritical, there wasn’t any thing wrong with Route 66.

    posted on November 18th, 2009 at 3:02 am

  10. 10 On November 20th, 2009, Mike said:

    Highwayman,

    The only thing wrong with Route 66 was that individual rights were violated when individual property was expropriated for the benefit of others in order to construct it. A mere technicality by the barometer of a pragmatist, but all the difference in the world to someone with principles.

    The reason why a thing is done is as important as, and often more important than, whether or how it is done.

    posted on November 20th, 2009 at 1:35 pm

  11. 11 On November 21st, 2009, the highwayman said:

    Again Mike, that’s very hypocritical.

    posted on November 21st, 2009 at 12:53 pm

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.