Reason Foundation on High-Speed Rail

The Reason Foundation just published its analysis of California’s high-speed rail plan. The full study is also accompanied by a series of policy briefs on the effects of high-speed rail on congestion, greenhouse gases, and California finances.

“The current high-speed rail plan is a fairy tale,” says Adrian Moore, Ph.D., Reason’s vice president of research. “The proposal suggests these high-speed trains will be the fastest ever; the most-ridden ever; the cheapest ever; and will convince millions of Californians they no longer need to drive or fly. Offering up a best-case scenario is one thing, but actually depending on all of these miracles to happen simultaneously is irresponsible public policy.” Moore also has an op ed on the subject in today’s Orange County Register.

The actual study was written by Wendell Cox and Joseph Vranich. Rail transit advocates love to portray Cox as “Mr. Anti-Transit,” because if you aren’t for their very expensive version of transit then you must be against all transit. They have a more difficult time demonizing Vranich, as he wrote a 1991 book advocating high-speed rail and served as president of the High Speed Rail Association in the early 1990s. He also once served as Amtrak’s public affairs spokesman.
A massive range of http://cute-n-tiny.com/cute-animals/wrinkled-dog/ cheap viagra india pessimistic elements hover around making the sexual instinct miserable one. This pill is absorbed in the blood around the body muscles and subsequently followed by contraction in the muscles which dismisses the path of active transmission of the transmission process of the stimulated signals from the brain to the penile nerve.Men have claimed to cute-n-tiny.com viagra properien find timely actions of Kamagra by consuming the recommended dosage whenever you are interested. This medicine is not having any restrictions like few male enhancement drugs have but cheap online levitra only point to remember when you are taking different drugs that hold nitrate parts. So there you have it, these were just some of the major branches of psychology, new cheap levitra http://cute-n-tiny.com/cute-animals/tiger-kitten/ branches are being introduced with time to help us understand different life aspects more easily.
The 144-page report attempts to do a “due diligence” analysis of the California high-speed rail business plan, which calls for private investment funding some percentage of the project. Cox and Vranich conclude that investors would be foolish to put their money into a project whose ridership projections far too high and cost projections are far too low.

In particular, they call the Rail Authority’s ridership projections “the most unrealistic projections produced for a major transport project anywhere in the world.” They also note that the average speeds called for in the plan “are not be achieved anywhere in the world,” and if California fails to achieve them the rail system will not compete as well with air service as planners claim. The report estimates that actual time from San Francisco to Los Angeles will be more than 3 hours and 40 minutes rather than the 2:38 projected by the Rail Authority.

Cox and Vranich estimate that the cost of the San Francisco-to-Los Angeles segment alone will be $40 to $50 billion, so the $9 billion in bonds voters will consider this November will cover less than a quarter of that first phase. The total system, they estimate, will cost $65 to $81 billion. Moreover, far from becoming a profitable operation by 2020, the Reason report concludes that operating the high-speed rail line will still be losing money well beyond 2030.

Tomorrow, the Antiplanner will present the thrilling conclusions to an eight-part series on high-speed rail.

Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

6 Responses to Reason Foundation on High-Speed Rail

  1. the highwayman says:

    the big problem with “The Reason Foundation” is that they are not known for being that REASONABLE!

  2. Hugh Jardonn says:

    Joseph Vranich is reasonable. His voice lends credibility to this report.

  3. the highwayman says:

    Not really, today his name sends up an instant red flag, along with Cox & O’Toole.

    Supertrains and Derailed are two very different books.

  4. Hugh Jardonn says:

    You can’t debunk two books with a one-sentence post, sorry.

  5. the highwayman says:

    Supertrains was a very good book, Derailed is another story.

    Vranich has some other agenda these days. To me the only valid point he brought up in Derailed was aspects of relating to labor red tape, though this is, because of the USDOT not wanting to do their job.

  6. the highwayman says:

    BTW, expect stuff coming out Reason to be BULLSHIT!

Leave a Reply