The Antiplanner »

Monthly Archives: December 2011

Is the U.N. Taking Over America?

By | | Mission
4 Comments

At a recent meeting about Oregon’s land-use planning system, someone asked how much Agenda 21 has influenced Oregon’s laws and rules. The answer the Antiplanner gave was a big, fat zero. Agenda 21, after all, was written in 1992, while Oregon’s legislature passed the state’s land-use law in 1973. The most radical conception of that law was first conceived in 1989 by 1000 Friends of Oregon.

This point is made by a recent article from the Antiplanner’s faithful allies at the Heritage Foundation. All of the ideas known as smart growth, compact development, new urbanism, or whatever were developed in the United States decades before Agenda 21 was written in 1992. If anything, American planners influenced Agenda 21 far more than they were influenced by it.

Continue reading →

Fast Spending on FasTracks

By | | News commentary, Transportation
15 Comments

The projected cost of the Denver-to-Longmont, or Northwest, rail line–one of six approved by Denver-area voters in 2004–has risen from the 2004 estimate of $462 million to $1.4 billion. For all that money, RTD won’t even get to own the rail line, but will merely rent it from BNSF. Moveover, most of the route from Denver to Boulder and Longmont will parallel a much-less-expensive bus-rapid transit route from Denver to Boulder.

The original cost projection for this corridor, made back in 2001, was just $211 million, an estimate published in a document called the Major Investment Study. This is the only study that seriously looked at alternatives other than rail transit (though it didn’t look at many alternatives), and a cost of $211 million may have seemed reasonable compared to, say, building new highway lanes.

According to this document, by 2004 the estimate had risen to $565 million (in 2002 dollars). (My copy of RTD’s 2004 financial plan says $594 million.) By 2007 the cost had risen once again by $120 million, and by 2008 it had reached $707 million.

Continue reading →

Moving in for the Kill–or to Be Fleeced?

By | | News commentary, Transportation
7 Comments

The Voice of Orange County reports that opponents of California’s high-speed rail boondoggle are “moving in for the kill.” But the article presents no clear path for killing the train to nowhere. While there are lawsuits, opponents in Congress, and critics in the state Legislative Analyst’s Office, the final decision will be made by the Democrat-dominated state legislature, which takes its cue from Governor Jerry Brown, who has endorsed the spending of $7 billion on a rail line that few will ever use.

The latest objective poll shows that 37 percent of the people who voted for high-speed rail in 2008 have changed their minds and would vote against it today now that the cost has doubled and the admitted benefits declined. (Only 3 percent of people who voted no say they would vote yes today.)

Continue reading →

Driverless Cars Take Off

By | | News commentary, Transportation
10 Comments

Self-driving cars will transform mobility, says Sebastian Thrun, the engineer who led the development of the Volkswagen and Google self-driving cars. The fact that Thrun’s article is featured in the New York Times constitutes a major endorsement from America’s “newspaper of record.”

This is the only major endorsement for driverless cars as represented by Thrun. The Huffington Post counts them as one of “18 great ideas of 2011.” Fast Company magazine declared Thrun number 5 on its list of the 100 most creative people in business in 2011 (and Thrun isn’t even a businessman).
Well, it has been proposed not to take kamagra as treatment for your viagra tablets india continue reading content erectile-problems: Never take the medicine without prescription if you have disease-related ED Never take the medicine for a long-time as it may reduce your natural potency of achieving erection. try some of the available remedies. For many sufferers of long-term illnesses such as http://mouthsofthesouth.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/MOTS-Camden-sale.pdf tadalafil 20mg uk Stress, Anxiety, Fears, Phobia, Worries, Confidence issues and Depression. Therefore, in case you are searching to alleviate your tension and provide you with a greater sex life, the best person cialis generic purchase for you to talk to is your doctor. Erection troubles are most annoying and embarrassing sexual problems that pfizer viagra for sale most men like to hid from others.
Maybe now we’ll be able to talk about real mobility instead of the artificial mobility provided by such obsolete technologies as streetcars and high-speed rail. “I envision a future in which our technology is available to everyone, in every car,” says Thrun. “I envision a future without traffic accidents or congestion. A future where everyone can use a car.” Sounds great to the Antiplanner.

Remember When Transit Used to Be Efficient?

By | | News commentary, Transportation
30 Comments

Arlington County, Virginia wants to spend $261 million building a streetcar line that, just four years ago, was expected to cost $100 million less. The streetcar’s costs are now expected to average $50 million a mile.

That’s quite literally insane. When San Diego built the first modern light-rail line, which opened in 1981, it cost about $15 million a mile in today’s dollars. But as more cities built light rail, costs soon rose to $50 million a mile on the average, with some coming in at more than $200 a mile.

Then, in 1999, Portland decided to built a streetcar line, which was billed as a “low-cost alternative” to light rail. Yet Portland’s original line cost $20 million a mile, more than San Diego’s original light-rail line. Now $50 million a mile is considered “comparable to similar projects across the nation.”

Ndividuals are lowering his or her expending in an cialis samples effort to save money in such economically hard times but they fail to realize that they can also lose their money, their health, and even their life”. The success of propecia lawsuit http://www.heritageihc.com/articles/23/ viagra buy in usa settlements depends upon the professional lawyer hired for the trail and settlement. So, at that point of time, you have to visit to heritageihc.com buying sildenafil online a physician for taking the remedy of the disease. Start slow and then cialis on line go hard. Continue reading →

Forthcoming Book: American Nightmare

By | | Housing, Mission
18 Comments

The American dream of families owning their own homes has become a victim of class warfare, with the middle class attempting to suppress homeownership among the working class and other people they view as undesirable neighbors. That, at least, is one of the major themes of American Nightmare: How Government Undermines the Dream of Home Ownership, which the Cato Institute will publish next May.

The Antiplanner’s work on this book is the major reason why I haven’t posted as regularly this year as in previous years. I began research for the book in January, started writing in July, and submitted the final manuscript to Cato on November 4. Though this was my third book since starting this blog, it was the most time-consuming because it required so much new research and analyses.

Continue reading →

If You Don’t Like the Data, Attack the Messenger

By | | News commentary, Transportation
2 Comments

California’s Legislative Analyst’s Office announced this week that the state is about to waste $6 billion or more starting construction on a high-speed rail line that will never be completed. “The availability of funding to complete a usable segment is highly uncertain,” said the report, to which the Antiplanner responds, “Duh!”

Yet some people aren’t ready to hear the truth. Assemblyperson Cathleen Galgiani, who claims to have authored the law that is now expected to cost taxpayers more than $100 billion, “decries” the new report as “misleading and biased.” Her complaint seems to be that there must be some sinister conspiracy against high-speed rail, but the Legislative Analyst’s Office won’t tell her who is behind this conspiracy.

Continue reading →

Remember When “Transit” Meant “Transportation”?

By | | News commentary, Transportation
31 Comments

Portland’s TriMet transit agency is spending more than $370,000 to install solar panels on a downtown building. This will initially save the agency less than $3,700 a year, and even if the savings increase over time, when interest is counted there will be something close to a 100-year payback period.

In opacc.cv cialis samples addition, it also boosts up muscle strength. There are lots of home remedies that are safe for viagra india online opacc.cv erectile dysfunction. You can buy these herbal remedies from reliable online stores purchase viagra in australia using a credit or debit card. You’ll see results immediately after taking a Kamagra 100 mg tablet, generic levitra online offers the same effectiveness and strength. Someone comments on the above news article that the $3,700 must be a typo; it must really be $37,000 because the typical payback period on a solar investment should be around 10 years. But no, other stories confirm that the anticipated savings is just $3,680 a year. The solar panels are expected to generate about 67,000 kilowatt-hours per year, which at an average wholesale cost of about 5.5 cents per kilowatt-hour is $3,680.

TriMet is doing this because it had the money left over after building a light-rail line to Clackamas, Oregon. It’s not like it could have returned the money to the taxpayers, or at least spent it on improved bus service or something that has an actual transportation benefit. In Portland, image is far more important than reality.