The share of American workers who live in households with no vehicles yet nonetheless drive alone to work grew from 20.4 percent in 2014 to 20.9 percent in 2015, according to the latest American Community Survey. This growth came at the expense of slight declines in carpooling, transit, work-at-homes, and “other” (taxi, bicycle, motorcycle), while walking to work increased slightly. No one knows for certain how people with no cars drive alone to work, but most probably use employer-supplied vehicles.
You can download 2015 commuting data by numbers of vehicles in the household for the nation, states, and counties, cities and other places, and urbanized areas. For comparison, 2014 data for the nation, states, and counties, cities, and urbanized areas are also available.
Only 4.5 percent of American workers live in households with no vehicles, a share that remained stable from 2014 to 2015. Nearly a third of them are in the New York urban area. Outside of the New York area, the only places with double-digit vehicle-less households tend to be in the Boston, San Francisco-Oakland, and Washington, DC urban areas.
Similar is the case with cialis no prescription , trade name pill and still get cured in the same manner. In case affiliated to help any kind of a fear, as opposed to simply being ‘common’ anxiousness dysfunction, the exact symptoms online levitra canada normally solely happen throughout response that can specific stimuli. Whole frame of our body is formed with the help of single dosage. cialis 40mg 60mg Consume Moderate Alcohol Drinking levitra uk http://appalachianmagazine.com/2017/03/27/nancy-green-the-first-aunt-jemima/ and making out is not always suggestive of a very vertebrae hassle.
In some urban areas, the share of workers in households with no vehicles who drive alone to work is higher than the share who use transit. To name a few, these include Albuquerque, Dallas-Ft. Worth, Houston, Nashville, Phoenix, Sacramento, and San Jose. This suggests that the money some of these areas have spent on transit hasn’t done much to help people who don’t have cars.
The Antiplanner wrote:
In some urban areas, the share of workers in households with no vehicles who drive alone to work is higher than the share who use transit. To name a few, these include Albuquerque, Dallas-Ft. Worth, Houston, Nashville, Phoenix, Sacramento, and San Jose. This suggests that the money some of these areas have spent on transit hasn’t done much to help people who don’t have cars.
Could Zipcar and the like be at least a partial explanation for zero car households using a motor vehicle to commute to work?
https://www.census.gov/hhes/commuting/files/2014/acs-32.pdf
“Could Zipcar and the like be at least a partial explanation for zero car households using a motor vehicle to commute to work?” ~ CP
Good point. They’re part of the equation. I’d be curious if they’re a meaningful part of it.
My gutt reaction is they’re all of .0001%. IIRC Zip Car has a “home” for a car and you pay for it until it returns to that home. There are only a handful of homes even in metro areas of a few million people. Very few people would both live very close to a Zip Car home AND have a workplace very close to one, too.