A couple of weeks ago, an article in the Orange County Register discussed transportation resiliency. “In spite of anti-auto policies, 80 percent of passenger travel and 90 percent of urban travel is by automobile,” concluded the article. “It’s time to take back cities for people and the automobiles that have liberated them to reach more productive jobs, better homes, lower-cost consumer goods, and greater recreation and social opportunities.”
Last week, Real Clear Policy published an article on a transportation bill recently passed by the House of Representatives. This bill, said the article, was perfect for the ’20s — the 1920s that is. The bill would effectively quintuple federal subsidies to intercity passenger trains and increase federal subsidies to urban transit by 50 percent, with a heavy emphasis on rail transit.
Often, many children on the spectrum struggle with sensory dysfunction and other unique challenges. discounts on viagra It all boils down to the personal and sexual hygiene and do not use online cialis without first consulting your doctorNowadays it’s possible to buy online cialis which can be availed at the half price of the blue pill. Unlike viagra online, they dissolve faster and become effective in 45 minutes. The online drug suppliers deliver these products in a plain parcel that purchase viagra from india has no marking or other evidence of what is bundled inside.
The use of both rail transit and intercity passenger trains, the article notes, peaked in 1920. Tens of billions of dollars in annual subsidies to these modes since 1970 haven’t prevented the continuing decline of these obsolete technologies and businesses. The proposed law “was designed for a century ago,” concludes the article. “It’s time to let go of the past and write a bill for the future.”
I wonder if their children and grandchildren will be fighting to subsidize and preserve some cars just the same. Sooner or later something will come along to replace them. How many living relics will be enough to satisfy them?