No One’s Riding Trains So Spend More

Amtrak ridership is down more than 75 percent. Commuter-rail ridership is down more than 80 percent. So naturally Amtrak and commuter-rail agencies want more money to expand service.

Commuter train in Utah. Photo by Paul Kimo McGregor.

Amtrak wants to resume service on a route from New Orleans to Jacksonville, or possibly just to Mobile, that had been dropped after Hurricane Katrina. The renewed route would begin operating in 2022 with full federal funding of operating costs for the first year. The implication is that Amtrak is demanding that Alabama and other states provide some of the funding after that. Proponents claim a 15-to-1 benefit-cost ratio. It’s more like 1-to-15. Their legislatures should say no.

Connecticut has one of the worst-patronized commuter-rail systems in the country. Fares covered less than 5 percent of operating costs in 2019 and the average car, which has 75 seats and room for 45 more standing, carried just 11 passengers. As of December 2020, ridership was down 90 percent from 2019 numbers. So naturally the state wants to add a new route. The main argument for the train is that “the track is there,” says one legislature. Wouldn’t want to let it go to waste, now, would we?

It is believed that traditional bike saddles reduce blood supply to unica-web.com levitra on line his penile organ and when that does not happen; he becomes the victim of erectile dysfunction or impotency which is seen in male. This condition that is purchase viagra online outlined as the failure of erection in men. The muscles levitra price of penile area can be relaxed which is crucial for having a strong erection. After taking these pills,you will notice that your ability to continue in the state of stimulation and continued erection gets viagra sans prescription unica-web.com hampered severely. Salt Lake City’s commuter-rail line, known as the FrontRunner, isn’t the worst boondoggle in the country, but considering that they’ve spent nearly $2.2 billion on it, it is pretty close. In 2019, it carried about 9,000 round-trip riders a day on a route parallel to I-15, which sees more than 150,000 vehicles per day. As of December 2020, ridership was down by 80 percent.

The trains take just over two hours to go from Provo to Ogden, a distance of 81 miles. That’s 40 miles per hour. For a lot less money, commuter-train passengers could ride faster buses on I-15’s congestion-free HOT lanes.

Naturally, the state wants to spend another $200 million to double-track the line. These are commuter trains, which means most traffic is in-bound in the morning and out-bound in the evening. Why do they need two tracks? Utah Transit runs trains in both directions in both morning and afternoon because it doesn’t have enough trainsets to just run one way. But buying more trainsets would cost a lot less than $200 million (and buying buses would cost even less).

The state is also looking at extending commuter trains statewide, meaning as far south as Cedar City and as far east as Green River. Utah isn’t the biggest state in the West, but trips from Green River to Salt Lake City would be at least three hours long while trips from Cedar City to Salt Lake would be close to five hours. Unless we are talking about telecommuters who just go into the office one day a week, that’s not reasonable for commutes.

Americans love passenger trains and state legislators seem to be no exceptions. But these plans are ridiculous.

Tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

5 Responses to No One’s Riding Trains So Spend More

  1. prk166 says:

    My fave headline from a couple weeks ago. I would imagine if Mobile doesn’t cough up $$$, the AL legislator will not either. We’ll see.

    https://www.al.com/news/2021/02/a-joy-ride-for-the-affluent-debate-renewed-in-mobile-over-amtraks-return.html

    ‘A joy ride for the affluent’: Debate renewed in Mobile over Amtrak’s return

  2. prk166 says:

    As for Florida, I’d venture that since they’ve never joined in with the Southern Rail Commission (SRC) that it’s not something the state is looking to do anytime soon.

  3. prk166 says:

    The double tracking idea for Front Runner is interesting. IIRC they built their own tracks along UP. Is UP that busy that they couldn’t share and thus double track? Or maybe UP isn’t interested in opening up that can of worms.

  4. prk166 says:

    Looks like Amtrak is announcing they’re going to start the service and some folks in Mobile aren’t happy.

    I couldn’t find how they’re going to pay for it. A longer AL.com piece spoke to Amtrak calling it regional service.

    Did some Amtrak’s suits decide to do the ol’ fake it til you make it and act like this New Orleans – Gulf Coast service is starting even though they don’t have funding in place?

    Just the other day there was mention in a piece on WSDOT scrapping it’s Talgos, they mentioned the Southern Railroad Commission wanted to talk about buying them. It would make sense. They need equipment to run + don’t have any.

    https://mynbc15.com/news/local/no-agreement-between-amtrak-and-csx-for-passenger-rail-in-mobile

  5. prk166 says:

    So the Feds are funding service that the states that will “benefit” are , understandably, reluctant to pay for.

    More, they are still far from this being a done deal.

    https://www.railwayage.com/news/new-orleans-mobile-amtrak-service-in-development/

    SRC said it has secured multiple federal grants to enable Amtrak Gulf Coast trains to start operating next year, “including full federal support of operating costs for the first year of service and continued federal support in the second and third year ($11.2 million), and a federal grant and local matching funds for improvements to area railroad infrastructure for passenger and freight service ($66 million) to cities along the route for planning, upgrading, and constructing their rail stations ($2 million).”

Leave a Reply