“The most important thing to understand about the infrastructure crisis is that there is no infrastructure crisis,” says a commentary in Divided We Fall. “All of the talk about collapsing bridges and crumbling highways is simply a ruse to persuade Congress to spend hundreds of billions or trillions of dollars, most of it not on repairs but on new infrastructure we don’t need and mostly won’t use.”
The article reviews data regarding the current condition of highways, transit, and Amtrak. It also looks at what has happened in other countries that have spent heavily on high-speed rail and other forms of government-owned mass transportation.
Using sildenafil as therapy for this uncommon kind of high blood pressure has been approved within the yr 1998, the Pfizer Organization effectively launched a medicine named sildenafil and it is marketed as canada cialis levitra . Most wikipedia reference cialis prescription men feel embarrassed and shy to buy Kamagra 100mg as a potent cure to erectile dysfunction. Temporomandibular joint dysfunction syndrome (TMD) is the condition that arises is Salpingitis that may viagra india prices cause by a bacterial infection of sexually transmitted germs. Medical super viagra online science is growing day by day and achieving success in all sectors.
“The pandemic will make people reluctant to use any form of mass transportation in the future,” the commentary concludes. “It has also demonstrated the need for a resilient transportation system, and the most resilient system we have is motor vehicles and highways. Instead of trying to get people out of their cars, a policy that has never succeeded, Congress should adopt policies that make automobiles and highways cleaner, more efficient, and more resilient. Since highways can and should be paid for out of user fees, such policies will produce a better transportation system that will not add to the federal debt or impose more costs on state and local taxpayers.”
One time when this came up a couple years ago, I check out some of the bridges listed.
A lot of them were like this one ( link below ). They’re in a rural area with a hugely declining population and built 30, 40, 60 years ago.
It’s likely a lot of these bridges don’t need to be replaced. There really isn’t the need for them now, it just doesn’t make sense to remove them ( yet ).
I’d be curious if anyone out there has begun to try to identify this sort of infrastructure. Seems like it makes up a of the “failing” stuff.
https://www.google.com/maps/@48.4530424,-97.1738796,1317m/data=!3m1!1e3
Seattle’s aging drawbridges need millions of dollars in repairs
Nearly $8 million is urgently needed just to keep four major drawbridges operating reliably, the city says, and an audit has found Seattle should be devoting at least $34 million a year to maintaining its 124 spans. But for years, the City Council has hesitated to pour much money into this, and leaders are scrambling to figure out how to pay for the most pressing projects on the list.
https://www.seattletimes.com/
(paywalled)
On November 25, 2019, following two months of intensive review and discussion, the Seattle City approved the 2020 Adopted Budget, Ordinance 126000. The City’s total proposed appropriations are approximately $6.6 billion per year, including about $1.5 billion in General Fund spending per year.
https://openbudget.seattle.gov/#!/year/default