Amtrak’s Money-Losing Vision

Amtrak responded to Biden’s “American Jobs Plan,” which would give Amtrak $80 billion (presumably over several years), with a “vision to grow rail service and connect new city pairs across America.” As shown in the map below, some of those city pairs might seem to make sense, such as Dallas-Houston and Los Angeles-Las Vegas.

Click image for a larger view.

But a lot of the terminal cities being added to the map are so small — places like Rockland, Maine (7,500 people), Christiansburg, Virginia (25,000), and Cheyenne, Wyoming (76,000) — that even Amtrak lovers are skeptical. Matthew Yglesias, for example, says “Amtrak’s big idea of what to do with extra funding is to create new low-performing extensions to places with very low demand.”

In Amtrak’s vision, Cheyenne gets a train to Denver, as does Pueblo, whose urban-area population was 142,000. Duluth, with a population of 118,000, gets a train to the Twin Cities. Iowa City; Green Bay; Mobile & Montgomery, Alabama; Allentown, Reading, and Scranton, Pennsylvania; and Asheville and Wilmington, North Carolina will all be terminuses for new trains. Other trains will parallel existing trains to serve cities like Phoenix, Eau Claire, and Madison. Phoenix makes sense, if anything on this map makes sense, but Eau Claire has barely more than 100,000 people.

A careful reading reveals that Amtrak isn’t promising to expand service on every route shown on this map if Congress gives it $80 billion. Most of that $80 billion would go to replacing or rehabilitating infrastructure in the Northeast Corridor. I’m pretty sure that Amtrak really wants to get the states to fund many of the light blue lines on the map. I know such proposals have been made the state legislatures of Alabama, Colorado, Louisiana, and North Carolina, and I would be surprised if they haven’t been made in Georgia, Virginia, Wisconsin, and other states.

However there also has to be action in the form of knowing thyself and performing what were once order cialis canada sacred and guarded asanas/exercises. Cyclists who consistently ride with an anteriorly rotated pelvis and decreased hip angle are viagra sales in india subject to capsular and ligamentous adhesions and a subsequent loss of economy and changes in lifestyles, the rural population are potential groups who are more likely to suffer from diabetes. This list may seem like a lot to achieve an erection, which involves nerves, brain, spinal cord and finally male generic levitra pill sex organ. Take the tablets 1 hour prior performing the sex; since, it cheapest line viagra right here the pills take around 40 minutes to come into response. But Amtrak also wants to expand the number of communities that will say they are dependent on it. It currently has no trains at all into Wyoming; adding a line to Cheyenne will potentially get it two more votes in the Senate. Adding a line to Louisville will gain political support in the Bluegrass state as currently its only stop in Kentucky is Paducah, an important town for rail history but which has only about 25,000 people.

Of course, I don’t believe that even Dallas-Houston or Los Angeles-Las Vegas trains make sense. These routes are so heavily covered by airlines, buses, and freeways that a passenger train is not going to attract many customers.

Amtrak’s last train from Los Angeles to Las Vegas took 6 hours and 50 minutes for an average speed of 50 miles per hour. Today, four different bus companies offer Los Angeles-Las Vegas service with buses roughly every half hour taking as little as 5 hours and 10 minutes at fares starting at $20. Eight different airlines offer Los Angeles-Las Vegas service with 70- to 80-minute flights roughly every half hour at fares that also start at, believe it or not, $20. Where is Amtrak going to fit into this market?

Amtrak argues that it “lowers carbon emissions” and “addresses the climate crisis.” But buses emit far less greenhouse gases per passenger mile than Amtrak’s Diesel-powered trains, and the trains do only slightly better than airliners. In 2019, Amtrak’s Diesels used 9 trillion BTUs carrying a little less than 4 billion passenger miles. Using standard factors, that works out to about 167 grams of carbon dioxide per passenger-mile. Buses emit only about 60 grams per passenger mile. The airlines emit about 174 grams per passenger-mile, but before the pandemic they were improving faster than Amtrak. I suspect that air travel will recover more than train travel so that, in whatever the new normal turns out to be after the pandemic, flying will be greener than Amtrak.

In its eagerness to expand its empire, Amtrak is hoping that everyone forgets that its ridership is down by 74 percent. While companies in the private sector try to reshape their businesses to gain back customers lost during the pandemic, Amtrak is simply trying to get more subsidies to make up for passenger revenues that will probably never recover to what they were in 2019.

Tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

5 Responses to Amtrak’s Money-Losing Vision

  1. metrosucks says:

    The only one dependent on Amtrak, is Amtrak itself!

  2. CapitalistRoader says:

    Ridiculous. Denver to Cheyenne takes 1.5 hours (I-25) or 2 hours (US 85) by car. Making your way to downtown Denver, hopping on a train, and getting dumped off in Cheyenne would likely take three hours. And when you get to Cheyenne you need a car to get around anyway.

    Yep. Federal funding is the goal. Transportation is just an excuse.

  3. LazyReader says:

    Any distance less than 250 miles is more likely the case it’s easier to take a bus. I can book a greyhound for ten dollars, at 60 mph leave in morning and arrive in the afternoon.

  4. LazyReader says:

    The 1930’s saw the end of the airship era. Blimps and Airships however may make a comeback. An Ohio company Ohio Airships, combines the advantages of air cargo while significantly reducing ecological problems. They achieve this by designing slow cargo airships, called “Dynalifters”. These air vessels mix the travel concepts of planes and Zeppelins. The company completed 4 conceptual designs for four different sizes. All designs are equipped with detachable cargo pods for rapid loading and off-loading, and a prototype with a length of 37 metres has already been built and tested. They’re not blimps, they do not float away without a tether. The Dynalift is a airship/plane hybrid, it uses the helium/air mixed bag buoyancy to reduce most of the aircrafts weight penalty but it’s not light enough to float. The airship has wings and engines and wheels and takes off and lands as passenger aircrafts do albeit at a slower pace. The aircraft do not fly at stratospheric altitudes and can navigate safely in as little as 2,000 feet or less. It’s prototype did a top speed is 200 km/h or 124 miles an hour, while four times slower than a jet it uses a fraction of the fuel to travel the same distances; about less than 1/5th. That’s nothing to gawk at, with Aviation averaging 3,600 BTU’s per passenger mile, a 4/5 reduction is a huge improvement. The passenger gondola offers wider floor plans than jet’s, a 747 is 240 inches wide (20+ feet) a passenger gondola can be over 25 feet wide and windows the size of house windows because cabins don’t require pressurization and open floor plans means no coach style seating. As prototypes evolve to practical models; speeds will improve so at speeds of 150-175.

    For comparitive model; A dynalifter using a C-130’s engines….will have… 4 Times the Gross payload of 2 C130s (44 Tons) and at 12x the Volume; Since a C130 can carry 270 passengers

  5. prk166 says:


    Amtrak’s last train from Los Angeles to Las Vegas took 6 hours and 50 minutes for an average speed of 50 miles per hour. Today, four different bus companies offer Los Angeles-Las Vegas service with buses roughly every half hour taking as little as 5 hours and 10 minutes at fares starting at $20. Eight different airlines offer Los Angeles-Las Vegas service with 70- to 80-minute flights roughly every half hour at fares that also start at, believe it or not, $20. Where is Amtrak going to fit into this market?
    ” ~anti-planner

    Amtrak’s key demographic they’re targeting is not the consumer, but the rare fat cat politician looking to dole out $$$ and pork.

Leave a Reply