A Bus Driver’s Life Is Worth $16,200

The state of California has fined the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) $16,200 for health and safety violations that may have led to the death of a bus driver, Audrey Lopez, from coronavirus last October. The state claims VTA failed to “require or ensure the use of face coverings at all times by employees at the facility and while operating the buses.” It also didn’t provide effective training instruction to employees on how to prevent the spread of the virus.

Naturally, VTA claims that Lopez didn’t catch the virus while on the job. But union president John Courtney says that Lopez had not been anywhere where she would have been exposed to the virus, other than work, in the days before she called in sick.

The transit industry insists that transit is safe to ride during the pandemic. However, the Centers for Disease Control says that air filtration systems must have a minimum efficiency reporting value (MERV) rating of 13 to filter out the virus. The filters used in VTA buses are rated 4, good enough to filter out pollen but not good enough to stop the virus.

No doubt this fine, as trivial as it is, will contribute to the debate over VTA’s board of directors. A bill has been introduced in the California legislature to replace the current board, which presently consists of 15 city councillors and 3 county supervisors, with a seven-member board, none of whom are elected officials. The current board, critics say, is more interested in bringing federal and state rail transit dollars into board members’ cities than in providing efficient and safe transit service. One result is that VTA is financially the worst-performing transit agency in the Bay Area, earning just 7 percent of its operating costs in fare revenues.

Assuring enough sleep after sex There are a few simple steps you can take on your own can be harmful or even lethal. free viagra pills You may be able to cialis españa get yourself a better deal. cheap online levitra The dosage of the impotence medications is recommended to be taken one hour prior to sexual activity, though it can be difficult to establish if the dysfunction is a result of the disease or the emotional issues. It may accomplish them sildenafil mastercard feel beneath of a woman. Normally, the Antiplanner thinks that changing the board of failing government agency is little better than rearranging the deck chairs of a sinking ship. But VTA’s board has a long history of poor performance and bad decision-making. I’m not the only one who thinks so: two years ago, a grand jury report that blamed the agency’s terrible record on the board as it is currently constituted.

Changing the board won’t change the fact that Congress encourages transit agencies to pick the most-expensive options in any corridor, or the fact that Congress is lately rewarding agencies for not carrying passengers. Basically, as I’ve noted before, the transit industry is shielded from any pressures to be efficient, to innovate, or to actually serve rider needs.

VTA is not the worst performing agency in a terrible industry. But considering it serves one of the wealthiest urban areas in the world and one that has the third highest population density in the United States, you’d think it could do a lot better that cover just 9.1 percent of its operating costs with fares, attract an average of more than 8.6 passengers on its 40-seat buses, and more than 14 passengers on its 65-seat light-rail cars, but that’s all that it did before the pandemic.

As of January, 2021, VTA has lost 70 percent of its riders compared with January 2020, so its performance is worse than ever. Maybe changing the board will bring in people willing to question the assumption that expensive rail transit is the best solution for an area whose population density may be high but whose downtown has less than 3 percent of the region’s jobs.

Tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

3 Responses to A Bus Driver’s Life Is Worth $16,200

  1. Ted says:

    Speaking of “the virus,” it’s becoming more apparent that this was nothing more than a massive power grab and is being used as a catalyst for the Great Reset.

    A recent study has shown that the infection fatality rate internationally is about 0.15%, nowhere near the inflated WHO estimates of 3-4%.

  2. prk166 says:


    you’d think it could do a lot better that cover just 9.1 percent of its operating costs with fares, attract an average of more than 8.6 passengers on its 40-seat buses, and more than 14 passengers on its 65-seat light-rail cars, but that’s all that it did before the pandemic.
    ” ~anti-planner
    When 90+% of your $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ comes from politicians, your operations reflect what the politicians want, not what real people need.

  3. Hugh Jardonn says:

    VTA needs more than a reorganized board. They should value-engineer their big capital projects. For example, the part of the BART extension to San Jose that continues on to Santa Clara continues on to Santa Clara duplicating existing Caltrain and VTA bus service. This could be eliminated and the tunnel under Santa Clara street could use less expensive technology.

Leave a Reply