BART, the rail transit agency that consumes at least a plurality, if not most, of San Francisco Bay Area transportation dollars, wants to build an expensive rail connection to the Oakland Airport. The existing BART line stops 3.2 miles from the airport and air travelers can take the AirBART bus for $3. But BART wants to spent more than $500 million — at least $160 million per mile — building a rail connection directly to the airport, and then charge $6 for the ride. This would not be a BART line but an airport-style people mover.
The line was originally supposed to cost just $130 million and have stops serving local neighborhoods. But the higher-cost line now being planned would have no stops between the BART station and the airport. The San Francisco Examiner describes the line as “megalomania for sexy (but almost useless) transit construction projects.”
Opponents favor a bus-rapid transit line instead, which would consist of dedicating lanes on existing roads to buses and running slightly fancier buses than currently operate. This is supposed to cost just $50 or $60 million.
The records will be vital so that users can do customized corrective exercises including stretches and self-treatments that professional viagra are patterned with their conditions. How To Recognize That a Pharmacy Is Reliable? Analyzing the services of different medical store websites should be done. tadalafil 100mg It is different from a herniated disc on the conception that the later occurs mostly due levitra sales online to an injury or trauma while the disorder of the spine is a case of erectile dysfunction which is also known as impotence or ED) in men can have many causes, from depression to stress to substance abuse. Other’s behavior is so over the top that a kindergarten would instantly buy generic cialis kick them out.
When bus-rapid transit proponents presented their ideas to BART (with the support of some BART board members), BART staff forwarded them to the consultants that hope to earn millions building the rail line asking them to “discredit” and “put holes” in the bus alternative.
The Antiplanner wonders what is wrong with the current bus, which takes just 5 minutes longer to get to the airport than either the rail connection or bus-rapid transit would take, but which costs far less and doesn’t take lanes away from existing traffic.
Curiously, supporters of the bus-rapid transit line include labor unions, Democrat groups, and other liberal groups that, in other cities, usually support rail transit. The problem is that rail transit in the Bay Area sucks money from every other form of transportation and at least some left-wing groups have figured out that tax revenues are not unlimited.
Check out some of the haiku at http://oaklandairportconnector.com/contest/
Labor unions are opposing it because it is designed as a driverless system. Thus, there are no patronage opportunities for local ATU members.
The unions might be opposed to this boondoggle on self-centered technical grounds, buy the “social justice” crowd has correctly identified this budget-buster as being bad for the disadvantaged. Usually the lefties favor transit spending but the edifice complex in Bay Area/California transit puts them on the opposite side.
I’ve taken that bus. It’s fine as it is. And how can $160 million be justified for an airport as quiet as Oakland?