FlixBus Buys Greyhound

In a move that is sure to shake up America’s fluid, intercity-bus market, one of the newest entries into that market, FlixBus, is buying one of the oldest, Greyhound. Greyhound was previously owned by FirstGroup, one of the two main British companies that emerged from Britain’s bus privatization in the 1990s.

The other British company was Stagecoach, which started Megabus, which revolutionized American intercity bus operations in 2006 by offering curbside bus service (saving the cost of bus stations) and internet ticket sales (saving the cost of ticket agents). FirstGroup responded by buying Greyhound in 2007.

FlixBus began operating in Germany in 2013 and within five years had captured 90 percent of that country’s intercity bus market. Unlike Greyhound and Megabus, FlixBus did not operate its own buses but instead contracted them out to other bus owners who displayed FlixBus’s logos while FlixBus provided the marketing and ticket sales services.

In 2016, FlixBus bought Megabus’ European operations from Stagecoach while contracting with Stagecoach to operate the buses. FlixBus’ entry into many American markets in 2018 competed directly with some Megabus routes, ironically contracting with Stagecoach to operate some of those routes. This may have persuaded Stagecoach to sell its North American Megabus operations in 2019 to a Los Angeles equity firm.

Pay per click campaigns can quite easily cost you much but it will surely taper off the problem in minutes. viagra for cheap generic cheap viagra Working fast here means that it starts its effect within 30 to 45 minutes. Medical science has advanced greatly in recent years and one treatment that has been developed is viagra online no rx seanamic.com. The primary idea sildenafil 50mg Clicking Here of this therapy is lasting preservation and a certain amount of growth. In 2018, FlixMobility also began offering FlixTrains in Germany and Sweden in competition with (but using the same tracks as) state-owned railways in those countries. The European Union has pressured various countries to open up their rail operations to competitors, a policy that greatly increased rail ridership in Britain, and FlixMobility was able to take advantage of that opportunity.

In buying Greyhound, FlixBus appears to have departed from its policy of not owning buses as Greyhound consists mainly of a fleet of 1,700 coaches. This isn’t entirely unprecedented, however, as in 2019 FlixBus bought Turkish bus company Kamil Köç, including its buses, and continues to own and operate those buses.

FlixBus is paying FirstGroup $172 million for Greyhound. That’s a real bargain considering that FirstGroup paid sixteen times that much for it in 2007. FirstGroup also assumed $800 million of Greyhound’s debt when it bought the company in 2007, but is accepting responsibility for $320 million in liabilities (such as pensions) as a part of its deal with FlixBus. FirstGroup therefore appears to have lost more than $3.7 billion on Greyhound.

Greyhound also owned at least some of the 230 bus stations and various maintenance facilities that it uses, but Stagecoach is hanging on to many of those stations and other properties with plans to lease them to FlixBus and eventually to sell them. These have an estimated value of less than $200 million, so won’t do much to cover FirstGroup’s losses on Greyhound. With Stagecoach getting out of the North American intercity bus market, both British companies seem to be conceding ground to FlixBus.

Still, purchase of Greyhound could be risky for FlixBus. While no data are available, bus ridership is no doubt low due to the pandemic and what happens to ridership in the future is anyone’s guess. While FlixBus says it will continue to operate Greyhound and FlixBus as separate brands, at least the old dog will be run by someone capable of learning new tricks.

Tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

About The Antiplanner

The Antiplanner is a forester and economist with more than fifty years of experience critiquing government land-use and transportation plans.

2 Responses to FlixBus Buys Greyhound

  1. LazyReader says:

    “Anyone can start a bus company”
    There in lies that aspect, no need to fear. Anyone can start up a bus company, or a vanpool etc.

    Where as no one has emerged to buy rail entities, especially public ones. Before the mass publicization in the 60’s mass transit in the US, some agencies acttually generated a profit, carried MORE passengers and had more adequate infrastructure.

    What changed? transit agencies found a federal sugar daddy and in essence to reclaim their 19th century lifetstyle of railroad tycoon.

  2. LazyReader says:

    Bus’ biggest detriment is Stigma. Not it’s efficacy.

    In other news, India is pursuing high speed rail. Lots of political opposition, for a reason. India’s farmers have protested against HSR because of it’s land acquisition process. India just doesn’t have the technology for running trains at high speeds. Japan, France and China did so over decades. While India is very rail dependent , emphasis should focus rehabilitating and upgrading existing rail stock to accommodate greater passenger volumes. India’s rail is so overburdened people literally hang on the roof. Going over 300 kph hanging on the roof isn’t exactly a wise concept. Every year, Indian Railways have had to bear the costs, furnishings stolen, seats ruined. Beyond that fare evasion.

    Infrastructure Vandalism in India is ubiquitous, from cell towers, to stolen cable to missing manholes to vandalized trains and stations.

    China was supposed to be the #1 country for high speed rail. Instead it sunk huge capital costs, went a TRILLION IN DEBT over it. High speed rail costs 3 times more than conventional rail. Despite it’s speed advantage it costs more to maintain. 120 mph trains are more than adequate to accommodate passenger travel thru India’s major cities, it’s capacity that needs to be overhauled. All in all, India has spent a Billion dollar overhauling it’s rail, but needs to spend considerably more. Indian Railways has a substantial maintenance backlog…and Officials have stated in figures about 30% of trains run late.

    A country that can’t keep its urban rail systems in shape is not likely candidate to keep an a newly adopted rail system running in good operable condition. As Antiplanner noted “Real railroaders measure rail lifespans not in years but in the number of tons that roll over them.” Hence Modern rail should support about 1.3 billion tons on a straightaway, but only about 380 million tons on curve. India’s railstock which many times are often overpacked reach end of useful life. With no freight revenue, propensity for public vandalism and years of deferred maintenance, India should not be in the habit of adopting very expensive passenger trains for the sake of technological prestige.

    With Japan at 38,000 and China at 8,500 USD; India’s per capita income is only 1,700 USD a year, AFFORDABILITY is far more important factor than speed. Rail in India not only generates revenue it’s actually profitable. From a standpoint of necessity, Indian Railways provides essential service, imagine if all those indians drove………

Leave a Reply